Is the fetus a patient? Medical models of the relationship between a pregnant woman and an unborn child (in Polish)

Main Article Content

Kazimierz Szewczyk

Abstract

The paper traces the factors which promote a change in the relationship model between a pregnant woman and a fetus, from a complex one-patient medical model into a two-patient model. In the second model, as its name suggests, the prenatal phases of human life gain the moral status of an independent patient. Such an approach has adverse effects on a pregnant woman; these effects are mentioned in my polemic with Susan Mattingly. In the second part of the paper I analyze the attempt to offer a theoretical justification of the status of fetus as a patient taken up by Frank Chervenak and Laurence McCullough, in which the elements of the complex one-patient medical model of a pregnant woman and a fetus are preserved. My analysis shows the failure of such an approach.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Szewczyk, Kazimierz. 2012. “Is the Fetus a Patient? Medical Models of the Relationship Between a Pregnant Woman and an Unborn Child (in Polish)”. Diametros, no. 32 (June):110-30. https://doi.org/10.13153/diam.32.2012.480.
Section
Special topic – Bioethics and genetics
Author Biography

Kazimierz Szewczyk, Medical University of Lodz

Kazimierz Szewczyk, professor
Medical University of Lodz
Pl-90-131 Łódź
ul. Lindleya 6
kazimierz_szewczyk@onet.eu
Share |

References

Brown [2008] – S.D. Brown, “Fetus as Patient”: A Critique, “American Journal of Bioethics” (7) 2008.
View in Google Scholar

Cahill [1999] – H. Cahill, An Orwellian Scenario: Court Ordered Caesarean Section and Women’s Autonomy, “Nursing Ethics” (6) 1999.
View in Google Scholar

Chervenak, McCullough [1996] – F.A. Chervenak, L.B. McCullough, The Fetus as a Patient: An Essential Ethical Concept for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, “Journal of Maternal Fetal Medicine” (3) 1996.
View in Google Scholar

Chervenak, McCullough, Levine [2007] – F.A. Chervenak, L.B. McCullough, M.I. Levine, An Ethically Justified, Clinically Comprehensive Approach to Peri-Viability: Gynecological, Obstetric, Perinatal and Neonatal Dimensions, “Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology” (1) 2007.
View in Google Scholar

Dickens, Cook [2003] – B.M. Dickens, R.J. Cook, Ethical and Legal Approaches to “the Fetal Patient”, “International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics” (2) 2003; dostępne na stronie: http://www.fygo.dk/files/ukursus/foetal/2008/fetal%20rights
View in Google Scholar

%20ethics%20and%20law%20I%20J%20gyn-obstet%202003.pdf.
View in Google Scholar

Dworkin [1994] – R. Dworkin, Life’s Dominion. An Argument About Abortion, Euthanasia, and Individual Freedom, Vintage Books, New York 1994.
View in Google Scholar

European Court of Human Rights [2011] – European Court of Human Rights, Case of R.R. v. Poland, no application 27617/04, Strasbourg 2011; dostępne na stronie: http://cmiskp.echr.coe.int/tkp197/view.asp?action=html&documentId=885774&portal=hbkm&source=externalbydocnumber&table=F69A27FD8FB86142BF01C1166DEA398649.
View in Google Scholar

Federacja na rzecz Kobiet i Planowania Rodziny [2011] – Federacja na rzecz Kobiet i Planowania Rodziny, Stanowisko w sprawie wyroku Europejskiego Trybunału praw człowieka w sprawie R.R. przeciwko Polsce, Warszawa, 26 maja 2011; dostępne na stronie: http://federa.org.pl/dokumenty_pdf/centrumprasowe/stanowisko_wy rok_sprawa_RR.pdf.
View in Google Scholar

Gillon [2003] – R. Gillon, Ethics Needs Principles – Four Can Encompass the Rest – and the Respect for Autonomy Should Be “First Among Equals”, “Journal of Medical Ethics” (5) 2003.
View in Google Scholar

Health Council of the Netherlands [2009] – Health Council of the Netherlands, Care for Unborn Child, Centre for Ethics and Health, Hague 2009; dostępne na stronie: http://www.gezondheidsraad.nl/sites/default/files/200901E.pdf.
View in Google Scholar

Heyd [1992] – D. Heyd, Genethics. Moral Issues in the Creation of People, University of California Press, Berkeley 1992; dostępne na stronie: http://publishing.cdlib.org/ucpressebooks/view?docId=ft309nb1nd&brand=ucpress.
View in Google Scholar

Jonsen [2003] – A.R. Jonsen, The Birth of Bioethics, Oxford University Press, New York 2003.
View in Google Scholar

Lyerly, Little, Faden [2008] – A.D. Lyerly, M.O. Little, R.R. Faden, A Critique of the “Fetus as Patient”, “American Journal of Bioethics” (7) 2008.
View in Google Scholar

Mattingly [1992] – S. Mattingly, The Maternal-Fetal Dyad: Exploring the Two-Patient Obstetric Model, “Hastings Center Report” (1) 1992; dostępne na stronie: http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_go2103/is_n1_v22/ai_n28611453/.
View in Google Scholar

McCullough, Chervenak [2008] – L.B. McCullough, F.A. Chervenak, A Critical Analysis of the Concept and Discourse of “Unborn Child”, “American Journal of Bioethics” (7) 2008.
View in Google Scholar

Nowacka [2003] – M. Nowacka, Etyka a transplantacje, WN PWN, Warszawa 2003.
View in Google Scholar

Silverman [1981] – W.A. Silverman, Mismatched Attitudes About Neonatal Death, “Hastings Center Report” (6) 1981.
View in Google Scholar

Strong [2008] – C. Strong, Do Embryonic “Patients” Have Moral Interests?, “American Journal of Bioethics” (7) 2008.
View in Google Scholar

Strong [2011] – C. Strong, Moral Status and the Fetus: Continuation of a Dialogue, “American Journal of Bioethics” (5) 2011.
View in Google Scholar

Syweńki i et al. [2008] – E. Syweńki et al., Płód jako pacjent – rys historyczny, „Perinatologia, Neonatologia i Ginekologia” (4) 2008; dostępne na stronie: http://www.ptmp.pl/png/png1z4_2008/pngz14-12.pdf.
View in Google Scholar

Szewczyk [2002] – K. Szewczyk, Bioetyka kulturowa wobec sporu o aborcję, [w:] Narodziny i śmierć. Bioetyka kulturowa wobec stanów granicznych życia ludzkiego, red. M. Gałusz- ka, K. Szewczyk, WN PWN, Warszawa 2002, s. 60-109.
View in Google Scholar

Szewczyk [2009] – K. Szewczyk, Bioetyka. Pacjent w systemie opieki zdrowotnej, WN PWN, Warszawa 2009.
View in Google Scholar

Szewczyk [bdw. a.] – K. Szewczyk (opracowanie), Kazus Janusza Świtaja, Interdyscyplinarne Centrum Etyki, Bioetyka/etyka medyczna – spis kazusów; dostępne na stronie: http://www.incet.uj.edu.pl/dzialy.php?l=pl&p=31&i=3&m=27&n=1&z=&kk=134&k=47.
View in Google Scholar

Szewczyk [bdw.b.] – K. Szewczyk, Śmierć pacjentki w połogu – komentarz, Interdyscyplinarne Centrum Etyki, Bioetyka/etyka medyczna – spis kazusów; dostępne na stronie: http://www.incet.uj.edu.pl/dzialy.php?l=pl&p=31&i=3&m=27&n=2&z=&kk=11 9&k=15.
View in Google Scholar

Wasserman [2005] – D.T. Wasserman, The Nonidentity Problem. Disability, and the Role Morality of Prospective Parents, “Ethics” (1) 2005.
View in Google Scholar

Z. przeciwko Polsce [2008] – Z. przeciwko Polsce, Wniosek nr 46132/08 do Europejskiego Trybunału Praw Człowieka, z dnia 16.09.2008; dostępne na stronie: http://www.federa.org.pl/dokumenty_pdf/Strasburg2/Strasburg2009PL.pdf.
View in Google Scholar