Ethics for ethics teachers (in Polish)

Main Article Content

Barbara Chyrowicz

Abstract

The teaching method of a discipline is dictated by its specific character. This is also the case with ethics. The article is an attempt to derive from the specific character of ethics the moral guidelines that should be followed in teaching it. The article considers three issues. The first is an initial distinction between morality and ethics, the latter being the philosophical interpretation of the former. Next, there follows a presentation of the specifics of teaching ethics which result generally from the peculiar tension that exists between its theoretical character and its practical nature. The last part of the article formulates the guidelines which should be followed in teaching ethics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Chyrowicz, Barbara. 2010. “Ethics for Ethics Teachers (in Polish)”. Diametros, no. 25 (September):2-19. https://doi.org/10.13153/diam.25.2010.400.
Section
Special topic – Ethics for Professions
Author Biography

Barbara Chyrowicz

Barbara Chyrowicz SSpS, dr hab. profesor KUL; etyk, kierownik Katedry Etyki Szczegółowej KUL, autorka ponad 70 publikacji naukowych, w tym dwóch książek: (1997), Bioetyka i ryzyko. Argument "równi pochyłej" w dyskusji wokół osiągnięć współczesnej genetyki (2000 i 2002). Redaktor serii wydawniczej Etyka i Technika. W przygotowaniu monografia: Struktura i sposoby rozstrzygania dylematów moralnych.
Share |

References

Arystoteles [1996] – Arystoteles, Etyka Nikomachejska, tłum. D. Gromska, [w:] tenże, Dzieła wszystkie, t. V, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa 1996: 1094 b.
View in Google Scholar

Bocheński [1993] – J.M. Bocheński, Co to jest autorytet?, tłum. J. Parys, [w:] tenże, Logika i filozofia. Wybór pism, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa 1993: 240-243.
View in Google Scholar

Dancy [1985] – J. Dancy, The Role of Imaginary Cases in Ethics, „Pacific Philosophical Quarterly” (66) 1985: 141-153.
View in Google Scholar

Gert [2005] – B. Gert, Morality. Its Nature and Justification, Oxford University Press, New York 2005: 4-5.
View in Google Scholar

Jonsen, Toulmin [1989] – A.R. Jonsen, S. Toulmin, The Abuse of Casuistry. A History of Moral Reasoning, University of California Press, Berkeley - Los Angeles - London 1989.
View in Google Scholar

Ossowska [1963] – M. Ossowska, Socjologia moralności, PWN, Warszawa 1963: 178.
View in Google Scholar

Platon [1999] – Platon, Dialogi, tłum. W. Witwicki, Antyk, Kęty 1999.
View in Google Scholar

Rochefoucauld [1992] – La Rochefoucauld, Rozważania i uwagi moralne, tłum. L. Staff, Dom Wydawniczy Mediewal, Kraków 1992: 91.
View in Google Scholar

Singer [2002] – M. G. Singer, The Ideal of a Rational Morality, [w:] tenże, The Ideal of a Rational Morality. Philosophical Compositions, Clarendon Press, Oxford 2002: 4-9.
View in Google Scholar

Spaemann [2006a] – R. Spaemann, Czym jest etyka filozoficzna?, [w:] tenże, Granice. O etycznym wymiarze działania, tłum. J. Merecki, Oficyna Naukowa, Warszawa 2006: 14-15.
View in Google Scholar

Spaemann [2006b] – R. Spaemann, Dwa podstawowe pojęcia moralności, [w:] tenże, Granice. O etycznym wymiarze działania, tłum. J. Merecki, Oficyna Naukowa, Warszawa 2006: 83.
View in Google Scholar

Urmson [1998] – J.O. Urmson Saints and Heroes, [w:] Ethics. History, Theory, and Contemporary Issues, S.M. Cahn, P. Markie (ed.), Oxford University Press, Oxford – New York 1998: 699-708.
View in Google Scholar

Znamierowski [1964] – Cz. Znamierowski, Rozważania wstępne do nauki o moralności i o prawie, PWN, Warszawa 1964, s. 86.
View in Google Scholar