How Important Numbers Are in Rescuing Lives. A Debate on John Taurek (in Polish)

Main Article Content

Barbara Chyrowicz

Abstract

The controversies related to John Taurek’s rescue case concern the importance of numbers in deciding about whom to help in situations in which there is a shortage of means. Taurek thinks that the number of the needy does not matter; we can save one person rather than many people. Since both common sense and the duty to responsibly administer help make us approve the decision to help those who are more in number, Taurek’s thesis seems counterintuitive. The majority of authors discussing Taurek’s thesis defend the importance of numbers in such decisions, and few are inclined to accept some of his intuitions, recognizing the counting of people who need help as morally problematic. However, the authors who defend the importance of numbers reject a simple utilitarian approach and try to justify the claim that the majority should have priority in such a way that no person involved in the conflict of distribution could charge the rescuer with not having taken his or her claims into account.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Chyrowicz, Barbara. 2017. “How Important Numbers Are in Rescuing Lives. A Debate on John Taurek (in Polish)”. Diametros, no. 51 (March):1-27. https://doi.org/10.13153/diam.51.2017.1029.
Section
Equality in Healthcare
Author Biography

Barbara Chyrowicz, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin

Barbara Chyrowicz, prof. dr hab.Institute of PhilosophyThe John Paul II Catholic University of LublinAl. Raclawickie 14PL 20-950 LublinE-mail: barbarac@kul.pl
Share |

References

Anscombe [2005] - G.E.M. Anscombe, Who is wronged? Philippa Foot on Double Effect:One Point, w: Human Life, Action and Ethics. Essays by G.E.M. Anscombe, red. M. Geach, L. Gormally, Imprint Academic: Charlottesville 2005, s. 249-251.
View in Google Scholar

Broome [1998] - J. Broome, Kamm on Fairness, “Philosophy and Phenomenological Research” 58(1998), nr 4, s. 955-961.
View in Google Scholar

Feinberg [1974] - J. Feinberg, Noncomparative Justice, “The Philosophical Review” 83(1974), nr 3, s. 297-338.
View in Google Scholar

Hirose [2015] - I. Hirose, Moral Aggregation, New York: Oxford University Press 2015.
View in Google Scholar

Kamm [1993] - F.M. Kamm, Morality, Mortality, vol. I: Death and Whom to Save from It, New York - Oxford: Oxford University Press 1993.
View in Google Scholar

Kamm [2007] - F.M. Kamm, Intricate Ethics. Rights, Responsibilities , and Permissible Harm, New York: Oxford University Press 2007.
View in Google Scholar

Kavka [1979] - G.S. Kavka, The numbers should count, “Philosophical Studies” 36(1979), s. 285-294.
View in Google Scholar

Kumar [2001] - R. Kumar, Contractualism on saving the many, “Analysis” 61(2001), s. 165-170.
View in Google Scholar

Nagel [1997] - Th. Nagel, Równość, w: Tenże, Pytania ostateczne, tłum. A Romaniuk, Fundacja Aletheia: Warszawa 1997, s. 145-160.
View in Google Scholar

Hsieh, Struder, Wasserman [2006] - N. Hsieh, A. Struder, D. Wasserman, The Numbers Problem, “Philosophy and Public Affairs” 34(2006) s. 352-366.
View in Google Scholar

Otsuka [2000] - M. Otsuka, Scanlon and the claims of the many versus the one, “Analysis” 60(2000), s. 288-293.
View in Google Scholar

Otsuka [2006] - M. Otsuka, Saving Lives. Moral Theory, and the Claims of Individuals, “Philosophy and Public Affairs” 34(2006), s. 109-135.
View in Google Scholar

Scanlon [2000] - T.M. Scanlon, What We Owe to Each Other, Cambridge MA, London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press 2000.
View in Google Scholar

Schelling [2006] - T.C. Schelling, Should numbers determine whom to save?, w: Tenże, The strategies of commitment, Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press 2006.
View in Google Scholar

Taurek [1977] - J. Taurek, Should the Numbers Count?, “Philosophy and Public Affairs” 6(1977), s. 293-316.
View in Google Scholar

Temkin [2012] - L.S. Temkin, Rethinking the Good. Moral Ideals and the Nature of Practical Reasoning, New York: Oxford University Press 2012.
View in Google Scholar

Thomas [2012] - A. Thomas, Giving Each Person Her Due: Taurek Cases and Non-Comparative Justice, “Ethical Theory and Moral Practice” 15(2012), s. 661-676.
View in Google Scholar

Timmermann [2004] - J. Timmermann, The individualist lottery: how people count, but not their numbers, “Analysis” 64(2004), s. 106-112.
View in Google Scholar

Wasserman, Strudler [2003] - D. Wasserman, A. Strudler, Can a Nonconsequentialist Count Lives, “Philosophy and Public Affairs” 31(2003), s. 71-94.
View in Google Scholar