How Important Numbers Are in Rescuing Lives. A Debate on John Taurek (in Polish)
Main Article Content
Abstract
Article Details
By submitting his/her work to the Editorial Board, the author accepts, upon having his/her text recommended for publication, that Diametros applies the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license to the works we publish. Under this license, authors agree to make articles legally available for reuse, without permission or fees. Anyone may read, download, copy, print, distribute or reuse these articles without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as the author and original source are properly cited. The author holds the copyright without any other restrictions. Full information about CC-BY: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.
How to Cite
References
Anscombe [2005] - G.E.M. Anscombe, Who is wronged? Philippa Foot on Double Effect:One Point, w: Human Life, Action and Ethics. Essays by G.E.M. Anscombe, red. M. Geach, L. Gormally, Imprint Academic: Charlottesville 2005, s. 249-251.
Broome [1998] - J. Broome, Kamm on Fairness, “Philosophy and Phenomenological Research” 58(1998), nr 4, s. 955-961.
Feinberg [1974] - J. Feinberg, Noncomparative Justice, “The Philosophical Review” 83(1974), nr 3, s. 297-338.
Hirose [2015] - I. Hirose, Moral Aggregation, New York: Oxford University Press 2015.
Kamm [1993] - F.M. Kamm, Morality, Mortality, vol. I: Death and Whom to Save from It, New York - Oxford: Oxford University Press 1993.
Kamm [2007] - F.M. Kamm, Intricate Ethics. Rights, Responsibilities , and Permissible Harm, New York: Oxford University Press 2007.
Kavka [1979] - G.S. Kavka, The numbers should count, “Philosophical Studies” 36(1979), s. 285-294.
Kumar [2001] - R. Kumar, Contractualism on saving the many, “Analysis” 61(2001), s. 165-170.
Nagel [1997] - Th. Nagel, Równość, w: Tenże, Pytania ostateczne, tłum. A Romaniuk, Fundacja Aletheia: Warszawa 1997, s. 145-160.
Hsieh, Struder, Wasserman [2006] - N. Hsieh, A. Struder, D. Wasserman, The Numbers Problem, “Philosophy and Public Affairs” 34(2006) s. 352-366.
Otsuka [2000] - M. Otsuka, Scanlon and the claims of the many versus the one, “Analysis” 60(2000), s. 288-293.
Otsuka [2006] - M. Otsuka, Saving Lives. Moral Theory, and the Claims of Individuals, “Philosophy and Public Affairs” 34(2006), s. 109-135.
Scanlon [2000] - T.M. Scanlon, What We Owe to Each Other, Cambridge MA, London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press 2000.
Schelling [2006] - T.C. Schelling, Should numbers determine whom to save?, w: Tenże, The strategies of commitment, Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press 2006.
Taurek [1977] - J. Taurek, Should the Numbers Count?, “Philosophy and Public Affairs” 6(1977), s. 293-316.
Temkin [2012] - L.S. Temkin, Rethinking the Good. Moral Ideals and the Nature of Practical Reasoning, New York: Oxford University Press 2012.
Thomas [2012] - A. Thomas, Giving Each Person Her Due: Taurek Cases and Non-Comparative Justice, “Ethical Theory and Moral Practice” 15(2012), s. 661-676.
Timmermann [2004] - J. Timmermann, The individualist lottery: how people count, but not their numbers, “Analysis” 64(2004), s. 106-112.
Wasserman, Strudler [2003] - D. Wasserman, A. Strudler, Can a Nonconsequentialist Count Lives, “Philosophy and Public Affairs” 31(2003), s. 71-94.