The Brain from the Moral Point of View. The Notion of the Neurobiological Recalibration of Ethics
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
A proposal for the neurobiological recalibration of ethics termed as neuroethics has been presented by Patricia S. Churchland. Churchland claims that the more we understand the details of regulatory systems in the brain, the more we are convinced that our moral standards and practices reside in neurobiology. The term "neuroethics" has been used since 2002 to describe a new subdiscipline of ethics. Neuroethics has two main branches: the first, and most fundamental, is concerned with the moral problems related to the application of neuroscientific discoveries, the other, the neuroscience of ethics, refers to the impact of neuroscientific knowledge on our understanding of ethics. This article discuss the unique character of this new discipline and seeks to show that, while neurobiology affects our actions, it does not determine their moral dimension.
Downloads
Article Details
By submitting his/her work to the Editorial Board, the author accepts, upon having his/her text recommended for publication, that Diametros applies the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) license to works we publish. Under this license, authors agree to make articles legally available for reuse, without permission or fees, for any purpose except commercial. Anyone may read, download, copy, print, distribute or reuse these articles without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as the author and original source are properly cited. The author holds the copyright without any other restrictions. Full information about CC-BY-NC: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode.
References
American Psychological Association (2013), Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5®), APA, Washington DC.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596
Anderson S.W., Bechara A., Damasio H., Tranel D., Damasio A.R. (1999), Impairment of Social and Moral Behaviour Related to Early Damage in Human Prefrontal Cortex, „Nature, Neuroscience” 2 (11): 1032–1037.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/14833
Baertschi B., Mauron A. (2011), Genetic Determinism, Neuronal Determinism, and Determinism „Tout Court”, [w:] The Oxford Handbook of Neuroethics, J. Illes, B.J. Sahakian (red.), Oxford University Press, New York: 151–160.
View in Google Scholar
Berker S. (2009), The Normative Insignificance of Neuroscience, „Philosophy and Public Affairs” 37 (4): 293–329.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2009.01164.x
Blair R.J. (2007), The Amygdala and Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex in Morality and Psychopathy, „Trends in Cognitive Sciences” 11 (9): 387–392.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2007.07.003
Caplan A.L. (2003), Is better best?, „Scientific American” 9: 104–105.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0903-104
Chadwick R., Hedgecoe A. (2002), Commercial Exploitation of the Human Genome, [w:] A Companion to Genethics, J. Burley, J. Harris (red.), Blackwell Publischers, Malden, MA–Oxford: 334–345.
View in Google Scholar
Churchland P.S. (2006), Moral Decision – Making and the Brain, [w:] Neuroethics. Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice, and Policy, and policy, J. Illes (red.), Oxford University Press, New York: 3–16.
View in Google Scholar
Churchland P.S. (2007), Neuroscience: Reflections on the Neural Basis of Morality, [w:] Defining Right and Wrong in Brain Science. Essential Readings in Neuroethics, W. Glannon (red.), Dana Press, New York–Washington, D.C.: 179–182.
View in Google Scholar
Churchland P.S. (2013), Moralność mózgu. Co neuronauka mówi o moralności, tłum. M. Hohol, N. Marek, Copernicus Center Press, Kraków.
View in Google Scholar
Clausen J., Levy N. (2015), What is Neuroethics, [w:] Handbook of Neuroethics, vol. 1, J. Clausen, N. Levy (red.), Springer, Dordrecht.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4707-4
Cohen E. (2006), Conservative Bioethics and the Search for Wisdom, „The Hastings Center Report” 36 (1): 44–56.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/hcr.2006.0004
Cranford R.E. (1989), The Neurologists as Ethics Consultant and as a Member of the Institutional Ethics Committee. The Neuroethicist ethics committee. The neuroethicist, „Neurologic Clinics” 7 (4): 697–713.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0733-8619(18)30384-0
Crockett M., Clark L., Hauser M.D., Robbins T.W. (2010), Serotonin Selectively Influences Moral Judgment and Behaviour through Effects on Harm Aversion, „Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences” 107 (40): 17433–17438.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1009396107
Crockett M. (2016), Morphing Morals: Neurochemical Modulation of Moral Judgment and Behaviour, [w:] Moral Brains. The Neuroscience of Morality, S.M. Liao (red.), Oxford University Press, New York: 237–245.
View in Google Scholar
Crockett M., Rini R.A. (2015), Neuromodulators and the (In)stability of Moral Cognition, [w:] The Moral Brain: A Multidisciplinary Perspective, J. Decety, T. Wheatley (red.), The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA: 221–235
View in Google Scholar
Cushman F., Greene J.D. (2012), Finding Faults: How Moral Dilemmas Illuminate Cognitive Structure, „Social Neuroscience” 7 (3): 269–279.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2011.614000
Damasio A., Tranel D., Damasio H. (1990), Individuals with Sociopathic Behavior Caused by Frontal Damage Fail to Respond Autonomically to Social Stimuli, „Behavioral Brain Research” 41 (2): 81–94.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-4328(90)90144-4
Damasio A. (2011), Błąd Kartezjusza. Emocje, rozum i ludzki mózg, tłum. M. Karpiński, Dom Wydawniczy Rebis, Poznań.
View in Google Scholar
Davis M.H. (1999), Empatia. O umiejętności współodczuwania, tłum. J. Kubiak, Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne, Gdańsk.
View in Google Scholar
Driver J. (2016), The Limits of the Dual-Process View, [w:] Moral Brains. The Neuroscience of Morality, S.M. Liao (red.), Oxford University Press, New York: 150–158.
View in Google Scholar
Farah M.J. (2007), Emerging Ethical Issues in Neuroscience, [w:] Defining Right and Wrong in Brain Science. Essential Readings in Neuroethics, W. Glannon (red.), Dana Press, New York–Washington, D.C.: 19–36.
View in Google Scholar
Farah M.J. (2010), Neuroethics: An Overview, [w:] Neuroethics. An Introduction with Readings, M.J. Farah (red.), The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA–London: 1–10.
View in Google Scholar
Farah M.J., Illes J., Cook-Degan R., Gardner H., Kandel E., King P., Parens E., Sahakian B., Wolpe P.R. (2010), Neurocognitive Enhancement: What Can We Do and What Should We Do?, [w:] Neuroethics. An Introduction with Readings, M.J Farah (red.), The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA–London: 30–41.
View in Google Scholar
Farah M.J., Wolpe P.R. (2004), Monitoring and Manipulating Brain Functions. New Neuroscience Technologies and Their Ethical Implications, „The Hastings Center Report” 34 (3): 35–45.
View in Google Scholar
Fischbach R., Mindes J. (2011), Why Neurothicists Are Needed, [w:] The Oxford Handbook of Neuroethics, J. Illes, B.J. Sahakian (red.), Oxford University Press, New York: 343–376.
View in Google Scholar
Foot Ph. (1967), The Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of the Double Effect, „Oxford Review” 5: 5–15.
View in Google Scholar
Fukushi T., Sakura O., Koizumi H. (2007), Ethical consideration of neuroscience research: The perspectives on neuroethics in Japan, „Neuroscience Research” 57 (1): 10–16.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neures.2006.09.004
Gazzaniga M.S. (2005), The Ethical Brain, The Dana Press, New York.
View in Google Scholar
Gazzaniga M.S. (2013), Kto tu rządzi – ja czy mój mózg?, tłum. A. Nowak, Smak Słowa, Sopot.
View in Google Scholar
Glannon W. (2009), Our Brains are Not Us, „Bioethics” 23 (6): 321–329.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01727.x
Glannon W. (2010), Psychopharmacology and Memory, [w:] Defining Right and Wrong in Brain Science. Essential Readings in Neuroethics, W. Glannon (red.), Dana Press, New York–Washington, D.C.: 258–270.
View in Google Scholar
Glannon W. (red.) (2015), Free Will and the Brain. Neuroscientific, Philosophical, and Legal Perspectives, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139565820
Greely H., Sahakian B., Harris J., Kessler R.C., Gazzaniga M., Campbell P., Farah M.J. (2008), Towards Responsible Use of Cognitive-enhancing Drugs by the Healthy, „Nature” 456 (7223): 702–705.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/456702a
Greene J.D., Sommerville R.B., Nystrom L.E., Darley J.M., Cohen J.D. (2001), An fMRI Investigation of Emotional Engagement in Moral Judgment, „Science” 293 (5537): 2105–2108.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1062872
Greene J.D., Haidt J. (2002), How (and Where) Does Moral Judgment Work?, „Trends in Cognitive Sciences” 6 (12): 517–523.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(02)02011-9
Greene J.D., Cohen J. (2004), For the Law, Neuroscience Change Nothing and Everything, „Philosophical Transactions for the Royal Society of London (Series B, Biological Sciences)” 359 (1451): 1775–1785.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2004.1546
Greene J.D. (2008), The Secret Joke of Kant’s Soul, [w:] Moral Psychology: The Neuroscience of Morality, W. Sinnott-Armstrong (red.), The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA: 35–79.
View in Google Scholar
Greene J.D. (2016), Beyond Point-and-Shoot Morality. Why cognitive (Neuro)Science Matters for Ethics, [w:] Moral Brains. The Neuroscience of Morality, S.M. Liao (red.), Oxford University Press, New York: 119–149.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199357666.003.0005
Greene J.D. (2017), The Cognitive Neuroscience of Moral Judgment and Decision Making, [w:] The Moral Brain. A Multidisciplinary Perspective, J. Decety, T. Wheatley (red.), The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA–London: 197–220.
View in Google Scholar
Haidt J. (2001), The Emotional Dog and Its Rational Tail: A Social Intuitionist Approach to Moral Judgment, „Psychological Review” 108 (4): 814–834.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.814
Haidt J. (2007), The New Synthesis in Moral Psychology, „Science” 316 (5827): 998–1002.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1137651
Hamer D., Copeland P. (1998), Geny a charakter. Jak sobie radzić z genetycznym dziedzictwem?, tłum. J. Suchecki, Wydawnictwo CiS, Warszawa.
View in Google Scholar
Henrich J., Heine S.J., Norenzayan A. (2010), The Weiderst People in the World?, „Behavioral and Brain Sciences” 33 (2–3): 61–135.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999152X
Hickok G. (2016), Mit neuronów lustrzanych, tłum. K. Cipora, A. Machniak, Copernicus Center Press, Kraków.
View in Google Scholar
Honigsbaum M. (2011), Oxytocin: Could the „Trust Hormone” Rebound our Troubled World?, „The Guardian”, August 21, URL = https://www.theguardian.com/science/2011/aug/21/oxytocin-zak-neuroscience-trust-hormone [dostęp 19.12.2018].
View in Google Scholar
Ijzendoorn M., Huffmeijer R., Alink L., Bakermans-Kranenburg M., Tops M. (2011), The Impact of Oxytocin Administration on Charitable Donating Is Moderated by Experiences of Parental Love-Withdrawal, „Frontiers in Psychology” 2 (258): 1–8.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00258
Illes J. (2008), Brain Screening and Incidental Findings: Flocking to Folly?, „Lancet Neurology” 7 (1): 23–24.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70308-3
Illes J. (2009), Neurologisms, „American Journal of Bioethics” 9 (9): 1.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15265160903192557
Jaracz M., Borkowska A. (2012), Iowa Gambling Task – narzędzie do oceny podejmowania decyzji, „Psychiatria Polska” 46 (3): 461–472.
View in Google Scholar
Kagan S. (1991), The Limits of Morality, Clarendon Press, New York.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0198239165.001.0001
Kahneman D. (2003), A Perspective on Judgment and Choice: Mapping Bounded Rationality, „American Psychologist” 58 (9): 697–720.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.58.9.697
Kahneman D. (2012), Pułapki myślenia. O myśleniu szybkim i wolnym, tłum. P. Szymczak, Media Rodzina, Poznań.
View in Google Scholar
Kamm M. (2009), Neuroscience and Moral Reasoning: A Note on Recent Research, „Philosophy and Public Affairs” 37 (4): 330–345.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2009.01165.x
Kennett J., Fine C. (2008), Internalism and the Evidence from Psychopaths and „Acquired Sociopaths”, [w:] Moral Psychology: The Neuroscience of Morality, W. Sinnott-Armstrong (red.), MIT Press: Cambridge MA: 173–190.
View in Google Scholar
Kosfeld M., Heinrichs M., Zak P.J., Fischbacher U., Fehr E. (2005), Oxytocin Increases Trust in Humans, „Nature” 435 (7042): 673–676.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03701
Krämer U.M., Jansma H., Tempelmann C., Münte T.F. (2007), Tit-for-tat: The Neural Basis of Reactive Aggression, „NeuroImage” 38 (1): 203–211.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.07.029
Kulynych J. (2002), Legal and Ethical Issues in Neuroimaging Research: Human Subjects Protection, Medical Privacy, and the Public Communication of Research Results, „Brain and Cognition” 50 (3): 345–357.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2626(02)00518-3
Langleben D.D., Schroeder L., Maldjian J.A., Gur R.C., McDonald S., Ragland J.D., O’Brien C.P., Childress A.R. (2002), Brain Activity During Stimulated Deception: An Event-Related Functional Magnetic Resonance Study-Related Functional Magnetic Resonance Study, „NeuroImage” 15 (3): 727–732.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2001.1003
LeDoux J. (2003), Synaptic Self: How Our Brains Become Who We Are, Penguin Books, Harmondsworth.
View in Google Scholar
Levy N. (2007), Neuroethics. Challenges for the 21st Century, Cambridge University Press, New York.
View in Google Scholar
Liao S.M. (2016), Morality and Neuroscience: Past and Future, [w:] Moral Brains. The Neuroscience of Morality, S.M. Liao (red.), Oxford University Press, New York: 1–42.
View in Google Scholar
Matthews S. (2015), Neuromarketing: What Is It and Is It a Threat to Privacy?, [w:] Handbook of Neuroethics, vol. 3, J. Clausen, N. Levy (red.), Springer, Dordrecht: 1627–1645.
View in Google Scholar
Mathews D.J.H., Rabins P.V., Greenberg B.D. (2011), Deep Brain Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Neuropsychiatric Disorders, [w:] The Oxford Handbook of Neuroethics, J. Illes, B.J. Sahakian (red.), Oxford University Press, New York: 441–453.
View in Google Scholar
Medina J. (2000), The Genetic Inferno. Inside the Seven Deadly Sins, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
View in Google Scholar
Merkel R. (2015), Neurolaw: Introduction, [w:] Handbook of Neuroethics, vol. 3, J. Clausen, N. Levy (red.), Springer, Dordrecht: 1269–1278.
View in Google Scholar
Moll J., Eslinger P.J., Oliveira-Souza R. (2001), Frontopolar and Anterior Temporal Cortex Activation in a Moral Judgment Task: Preliminary Functional MRI Results in Normal Subjects, „Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria” 59: 657–664.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0004-282X2001000500001
Moll J., de Oliveira-Souza R., Eslinger P.J., Bramati I.E., Mourão-Miranda J., Andreiulo P.A., Pesoa L. (2002), The Neural Correlates of Moral Sensitivity: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Basic and Moral Emotions, „Journal of Neuroscience” 22 (7): 2730–2736.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-07-02730.2002
Morrison L. (2009), ECT: Shocked Beyond Belief, „Australasian Psychiatry” 17 (2): 164–167.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10398560802596090
Oliveira-Souza R., Zahn R., Moll J. (2017), Neural Correlates of Human Morality: An Overview, [w:] The Moral Brain. A Multidisciplinary Perspective, J. Decety, T. Wheatley (red.), The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA–London: 183–195.
View in Google Scholar
Pinsent A. (2015), Neurotheology, [w:] Handbook of Neuroethics, vol. 3, J. Clausen, N. Levy (red.), Springer, Dordrecht: 1527–1533.
View in Google Scholar
Pontius A.A. (1973), Neuro-ethics of „Walking” in the Newborn, „Perceptual and Motor Skills” 37 (1): 235–245.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1973.37.1.235
Prinz J. (2006), The Emotional Basis of Moral Judgments, „Philosophical Explorations” 9 (1): 29–43.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13869790500492466
The President’s Council on Bioethics Staff (2010), An Overview of the Impact of Neuroscience Evidence in Criminal Law, [w:] Neuroethics. An Introduction with Readings, M.J. Farah (red.), The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA: 220–231.
View in Google Scholar
Racine E. (2010), Pragmatic Neuroethics. Improving Treatment and Understanding of the Mind-Brain, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA–London.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/8027.001.0001
Reiner P.B. (2011), The Rise of Neuroessentialism, [w:] J. Illes, B.J. Sahakian (red.), Oxford University Press: New York: 161–175.
View in Google Scholar
Roskies A. (2002), Neuroethics for the New Millennium, „Neuron” 35 (1): 21–23.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00763-8
Roskies A. (2003), Are Ethical Judgments Intrinsically Motivational? Lessons From „Acquired Sociopathy”, „Philosophical Psychology” 16 (1): 51–66.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0951508032000067743
Roskies A. (2006), A Case Study of Neuroethics: The Nature of Moral Judgment, [w:] Neuroethics. Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice, and Policy, J. Illes (red.), Oxford University Press, New York: 17–32.
View in Google Scholar
Roskies A. (2008), Internalism and the Evidence from Pathology, [w:] Moral Psychology: The Neuroscience of Morality, W. Sinnott-Armstrong (red.), MIT Press: Cambridge MA: 191–206.
View in Google Scholar
Roskies A. (2016), Neuroethics, URL: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/neuroethics [dostęp 19.12.2018].
View in Google Scholar
Safire W. (2007), Vision for a New Field of „Neuroethics”, [w:] Defining Right and Wrong in Brain Science. Essential Readings in Neuroethics, W. Glannon (red.), Dana Press, New York–Washington, D.C.: 7–11.
View in Google Scholar
Sandberg A., Savulescu J. (2011), The Social and Economic Impacts of Cognitive Enhancement, [w:] Enhancing Human Capacities, J. Savulescu, R. Ter Meulen, G. Kahane (red.), Wiley-Blackwell: Malden, MA–Oxford: 92–112.
View in Google Scholar
Saver J., Damasio A. (1991), Preserved Access and Processing of Social Knowledge in a Patient with Acquired Sociopathy Due to Ventromedial Frontal Damage, „Neuropsychologia” 29 (12): 1241–1249.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(91)90037-9
Savulescu J., Bostrom N. (red.) (2009), Human Enhancement, Oxford University Press, New York.
View in Google Scholar
Scheffler S. (1994), The Rejection of Consequentialism, Clarendon Press, New York.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0198235119.001.0001
Singer P. (2005), Ethics and Intuitions, „The Journal of Ethics” 9 (3–4): 331–352.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-005-3508-y
Singer P. (2002), Famine, Affluence and Morality, [w:] idem, Unsanctifying Human Life. Essays on Ethics, H. Kuhse (red.), Blackwell: 145–156.
View in Google Scholar
Sinnott-Armstrong W. (2016), The Disunity of Morality, [w:] Moral Brains. The Neuroscience of Morality, S.M. Liao (red.), Oxford University Press, New York: 331–353.
View in Google Scholar
Smith M. (2002), The Moral Problem, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.
View in Google Scholar
Suhler Ch., Churchland P. (2011), The Neurobiological Basis of Morality, [w:] The Oxford Handbook of Neuroethics, J. Illes, B.J. Sahakian (red.), Oxford University Press, New York: 33–58.
View in Google Scholar
Tabibnia G., Satpute A.B., Lieberman M.D. (2008), The Sunny Side of Fairness: Preference for Fairness Activates Reward Circuitry (and Disregarding Unfairness Activates Self-Control Circuitry), „Psychological Science” 19 (4): 339–347.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02091.x
Unger P. (1996), Living High and Letting Die. Our Illusion of Innocence, Oxford University Press, New York–Oxford.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0195108590.001.0001
Wheatley T., Haidt J. (2005), Hypnotic Disgust Makes Moral Judgments More Severe, „Psychological Science” 16 (10): 780–784.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01614.x
Wiseman H., (2016), The Myth of the Moral Brain. The Limits of Moral Enhancement, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA–London.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/10560.001.0001
Wolpe P.R. (2004), Neuroethics, [w:] Encyclopedia of Bioethics, t. 3, G. Post (red.), MacMillan Reference: New York: 1894–1898.
View in Google Scholar
Zak P. (2010), The Science of Trust, URL = https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rEy6t4afJ1s [dostęp 19.12.2018].
View in Google Scholar
Zak P. (2011), The physiology of moral sentiments, “Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization” 77 (1): 53-65.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2009.11.009
Zak. P. (2005), Trust: A temporary human attachment facilitated by oxytocin, “Behavioral and Brain Sciences” 28 (3): 368-369.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X05400060
Zak P. (2012), The Moral Molecule: The New Science of What Makes Us Good or Evil, Bantam Press, London.
View in Google Scholar
Zak P. (2013), The Moral Molecule: The Source of Love and Prosperity, A Plume Book, New York.
View in Google Scholar
Zak P., Kurzban R., Matzner W. (2005), Oxytocin Is Associated with Human Trustworthiness, „Hormones and Behaviour” 48 (5): 522–527.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2005.07.009
Zak P., Stanton A., Ahmadi S. (2007), Oxytocin Increases Generosity in Humans, „Public Library of Science One” 2 (11): 1–5.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0001128