The Brain from the Moral Point of View. The Notion of the Neurobiological Recalibration of Ethics

Main Article Content

Barbara Chyrowicz
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0919-3844

Abstract

A proposal for the neurobiological recalibration of ethics termed as neuroethics has been presented by Patricia S. Churchland. Churchland claims that the more we understand the details of regulatory systems in the brain, the more we are convinced that our moral standards and practices reside in neurobiology. The term "neuroethics" has been used since 2002 to describe a new subdiscipline of ethics. Neuroethics has two main branches: the first, and most fundamental, is concerned with the moral problems related to the application of neuroscientific discoveries, the other, the neuroscience of ethics, refers to the impact of neuroscientific knowledge on our understanding of ethics. This article discuss the unique character of this new discipline and seeks to show that, while neurobiology affects our actions, it does not determine their moral dimension.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Chyrowicz, Barbara. 2019. “The Brain from the Moral Point of View. The Notion of the Neurobiological Recalibration of Ethics”. Diametros 17 (63), 1-33. https://doi.org/10.33392/diam.1249.
Section
Articles
Author Biography

Barbara Chyrowicz, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin

Barbara Chyrowicz, PhD

The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin

Department of Philosophy

Al. Raclawickie 14

PL-20-950 Lublin

e-mail: barbarac@kul.pl

Share |

References

American Psychological Association (2013), Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5®), APA, Washington DC.


DOI
View in Google Scholar

Anderson S.W., Bechara A., Damasio H., Tranel D., Damasio A.R. (1999), Impairment of Social and Moral Behaviour Related to Early Damage in Human Prefrontal Cortex, „Nature, Neuroscience” 2 (11): 1032–1037.


DOI
View in Google Scholar

Baertschi B., Mauron A. (2011), Genetic Determinism, Neuronal Determinism, and Determinism „Tout Court”, [w:] The Oxford Handbook of Neuroethics, J. Illes, B.J. Sahakian (red.), Oxford University Press, New York: 151–160.
View in Google Scholar

Berker S. (2009), The Normative Insignificance of Neuroscience, „Philosophy and Public Affairs” 37 (4): 293–329.


DOI
View in Google Scholar

Blair R.J. (2007), The Amygdala and Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex in Morality and Psychopathy, „Trends in Cognitive Sciences” 11 (9): 387–392.


DOI
View in Google Scholar

Caplan A.L. (2003), Is better best?, „Scientific American” 9: 104–105.


DOI
View in Google Scholar

Chadwick R., Hedgecoe A. (2002), Commercial Exploitation of the Human Genome, [w:] A Companion to Genethics, J. Burley, J. Harris (red.), Blackwell Publischers, Malden, MA–Oxford: 334–345.
View in Google Scholar

Churchland P.S. (2006), Moral Decision – Making and the Brain, [w:] Neuroethics. Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice, and Policy, and policy, J. Illes (red.), Oxford University Press, New York: 3–16.
View in Google Scholar

Churchland P.S. (2007), Neuroscience: Reflections on the Neural Basis of Morality, [w:] Defining Right and Wrong in Brain Science. Essential Readings in Neuroethics, W. Glannon (red.), Dana Press, New York–Washington, D.C.: 179–182.
View in Google Scholar

Churchland P.S. (2013), Moralność mózgu. Co neuronauka mówi o moralności, tłum. M. Hohol, N. Marek, Copernicus Center Press, Kraków.
View in Google Scholar


View in Google Scholar

Clausen J., Levy N. (2015), What is Neuroethics, [w:] Handbook of Neuroethics, vol. 1, J. Clausen, N. Levy (red.), Springer, Dordrecht.


DOI
View in Google Scholar

Cohen E. (2006), Conservative Bioethics and the Search for Wisdom, „The Hastings Center Report” 36 (1): 44–56.


DOI
View in Google Scholar

Cranford R.E. (1989), The Neurologists as Ethics Consultant and as a Member of the Institutional Ethics Committee. The Neuroethicist ethics committee. The neuroethicist, „Neurologic Clinics” 7 (4): 697–713.


DOI
View in Google Scholar

Crockett M., Clark L., Hauser M.D., Robbins T.W. (2010), Serotonin Selectively Influences Moral Judgment and Behaviour through Effects on Harm Aversion, „Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences” 107 (40): 17433–17438.


DOI
View in Google Scholar

Crockett M. (2016), Morphing Morals: Neurochemical Modulation of Moral Judgment and Behaviour, [w:] Moral Brains. The Neuroscience of Morality, S.M. Liao (red.), Oxford University Press, New York: 237–245.
View in Google Scholar

Crockett M., Rini R.A. (2015), Neuromodulators and the (In)stability of Moral Cognition, [w:] The Moral Brain: A Multidisciplinary Perspective, J. Decety, T. Wheatley (red.), The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA: 221–235
View in Google Scholar

Cushman F., Greene J.D. (2012), Finding Faults: How Moral Dilemmas Illuminate Cognitive Structure, „Social Neuroscience” 7 (3): 269–279.


DOI
View in Google Scholar

Damasio A., Tranel D., Damasio H. (1990), Individuals with Sociopathic Behavior Caused by Frontal Damage Fail to Respond Autonomically to Social Stimuli, „Behavioral Brain Research” 41 (2): 81–94.


DOI
View in Google Scholar

Damasio A. (2011), Błąd Kartezjusza. Emocje, rozum i ludzki mózg, tłum. M. Karpiński, Dom Wydawniczy Rebis, Poznań.
View in Google Scholar

Davis M.H. (1999), Empatia. O umiejętności współodczuwania, tłum. J. Kubiak, Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne, Gdańsk.
View in Google Scholar

Driver J. (2016), The Limits of the Dual-Process View, [w:] Moral Brains. The Neuroscience of Morality, S.M. Liao (red.), Oxford University Press, New York: 150–158.
View in Google Scholar

Farah M.J. (2007), Emerging Ethical Issues in Neuroscience, [w:] Defining Right and Wrong in Brain Science. Essential Readings in Neuroethics, W. Glannon (red.), Dana Press, New York–Washington, D.C.: 19–36.
View in Google Scholar

Farah M.J. (2010), Neuroethics: An Overview, [w:] Neuroethics. An Introduction with Readings, M.J. Farah (red.), The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA–London: 1–10.
View in Google Scholar

Farah M.J., Illes J., Cook-Degan R., Gardner H., Kandel E., King P., Parens E., Sahakian B., Wolpe P.R. (2010), Neurocognitive Enhancement: What Can We Do and What Should We Do?, [w:] Neuroethics. An Introduction with Readings, M.J Farah (red.), The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA–London: 30–41.
View in Google Scholar

Farah M.J., Wolpe P.R. (2004), Monitoring and Manipulating Brain Functions. New Neuroscience Technologies and Their Ethical Implications, „The Hastings Center Report” 34 (3): 35–45.
View in Google Scholar

Fischbach R., Mindes J. (2011), Why Neurothicists Are Needed, [w:] The Oxford Handbook of Neuroethics, J. Illes, B.J. Sahakian (red.), Oxford University Press, New York: 343–376.
View in Google Scholar

Foot Ph. (1967), The Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of the Double Effect, „Oxford Review” 5: 5–15.
View in Google Scholar

Fukushi T., Sakura O., Koizumi H. (2007), Ethical consideration of neuroscience research: The perspectives on neuroethics in Japan, „Neuroscience Research” 57 (1): 10–16.


DOI
View in Google Scholar

Gazzaniga M.S. (2005), The Ethical Brain, The Dana Press, New York.
View in Google Scholar

Gazzaniga M.S. (2013), Kto tu rządzi – ja czy mój mózg?, tłum. A. Nowak, Smak Słowa, Sopot.
View in Google Scholar

Glannon W. (2009), Our Brains are Not Us, „Bioethics” 23 (6): 321–329.


DOI
View in Google Scholar

Glannon W. (2010), Psychopharmacology and Memory, [w:] Defining Right and Wrong in Brain Science. Essential Readings in Neuroethics, W. Glannon (red.), Dana Press, New York–Washington, D.C.: 258–270.
View in Google Scholar

Glannon W. (red.) (2015), Free Will and the Brain. Neuroscientific, Philosophical, and Legal Perspectives, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.


DOI
View in Google Scholar

Greely H., Sahakian B., Harris J., Kessler R.C., Gazzaniga M., Campbell P., Farah M.J. (2008), Towards Responsible Use of Cognitive-enhancing Drugs by the Healthy, „Nature” 456 (7223): 702–705.


DOI
View in Google Scholar

Greene J.D., Sommerville R.B., Nystrom L.E., Darley J.M., Cohen J.D. (2001), An fMRI Investigation of Emotional Engagement in Moral Judgment, „Science” 293 (5537): 2105–2108.


DOI
View in Google Scholar

Greene J.D., Haidt J. (2002), How (and Where) Does Moral Judgment Work?, „Trends in Cognitive Sciences” 6 (12): 517–523.


DOI
View in Google Scholar

Greene J.D., Cohen J. (2004), For the Law, Neuroscience Change Nothing and Everything, „Philosophical Transactions for the Royal Society of London (Series B, Biological Sciences)” 359 (1451): 1775–1785.


DOI
View in Google Scholar

Greene J.D. (2008), The Secret Joke of Kant’s Soul, [w:] Moral Psychology: The Neuroscience of Morality, W. Sinnott-Armstrong (red.), The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA: 35–79.
View in Google Scholar

Greene J.D. (2016), Beyond Point-and-Shoot Morality. Why cognitive (Neuro)Science Matters for Ethics, [w:] Moral Brains. The Neuroscience of Morality, S.M. Liao (red.), Oxford University Press, New York: 119–149.


DOI
View in Google Scholar

Greene J.D. (2017), The Cognitive Neuroscience of Moral Judgment and Decision Making, [w:] The Moral Brain. A Multidisciplinary Perspective, J. Decety, T. Wheatley (red.), The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA–London: 197–220.
View in Google Scholar

Haidt J. (2001), The Emotional Dog and Its Rational Tail: A Social Intuitionist Approach to Moral Judgment, „Psychological Review” 108 (4): 814–834.


DOI
View in Google Scholar

Haidt J. (2007), The New Synthesis in Moral Psychology, „Science” 316 (5827): 998–1002.


DOI
View in Google Scholar

Hamer D., Copeland P. (1998), Geny a charakter. Jak sobie radzić z genetycznym dziedzictwem?, tłum. J. Suchecki, Wydawnictwo CiS, Warszawa.
View in Google Scholar

Henrich J., Heine S.J., Norenzayan A. (2010), The Weiderst People in the World?, „Behavioral and Brain Sciences” 33 (2–3): 61–135.


DOI
View in Google Scholar

Hickok G. (2016), Mit neuronów lustrzanych, tłum. K. Cipora, A. Machniak, Copernicus Center Press, Kraków.
View in Google Scholar

Honigsbaum M. (2011), Oxytocin: Could the „Trust Hormone” Rebound our Troubled World?, „The Guardian”, August 21, URL = https://www.theguardian.com/science/2011/aug/21/oxytocin-zak-neuroscience-trust-hormone [dostęp 19.12.2018].
View in Google Scholar

Ijzendoorn M., Huffmeijer R., Alink L., Bakermans-Kranenburg M., Tops M. (2011), The Impact of Oxytocin Administration on Charitable Donating Is Moderated by Experiences of Parental Love-Withdrawal, „Frontiers in Psychology” 2 (258): 1–8.


DOI
View in Google Scholar

Illes J. (2008), Brain Screening and Incidental Findings: Flocking to Folly?, „Lancet Neurology” 7 (1): 23–24.


DOI
View in Google Scholar

Illes J. (2009), Neurologisms, „American Journal of Bioethics” 9 (9): 1.


DOI
View in Google Scholar

Jaracz M., Borkowska A. (2012), Iowa Gambling Task – narzędzie do oceny podejmowania decyzji, „Psychiatria Polska” 46 (3): 461–472.
View in Google Scholar

Kagan S. (1991), The Limits of Morality, Clarendon Press, New York.


DOI
View in Google Scholar

Kahneman D. (2003), A Perspective on Judgment and Choice: Mapping Bounded Rationality, „American Psychologist” 58 (9): 697–720.


DOI
View in Google Scholar

Kahneman D. (2012), Pułapki myślenia. O myśleniu szybkim i wolnym, tłum. P. Szymczak, Media Rodzina, Poznań.
View in Google Scholar

Kamm M. (2009), Neuroscience and Moral Reasoning: A Note on Recent Research, „Philosophy and Public Affairs” 37 (4): 330–345.


DOI
View in Google Scholar

Kennett J., Fine C. (2008), Internalism and the Evidence from Psychopaths and „Acquired Sociopaths”, [w:] Moral Psychology: The Neuroscience of Morality, W. Sinnott-Armstrong (red.), MIT Press: Cambridge MA: 173–190.
View in Google Scholar

Kosfeld M., Heinrichs M., Zak P.J., Fischbacher U., Fehr E. (2005), Oxytocin Increases Trust in Humans, „Nature” 435 (7042): 673–676.


DOI
View in Google Scholar

Krämer U.M., Jansma H., Tempelmann C., Münte T.F. (2007), Tit-for-tat: The Neural Basis of Reactive Aggression, „NeuroImage” 38 (1): 203–211.


DOI
View in Google Scholar

Kulynych J. (2002), Legal and Ethical Issues in Neuroimaging Research: Human Subjects Protection, Medical Privacy, and the Public Communication of Research Results, „Brain and Cognition” 50 (3): 345–357.


DOI
View in Google Scholar

Langleben D.D., Schroeder L., Maldjian J.A., Gur R.C., McDonald S., Ragland J.D., O’Brien C.P., Childress A.R. (2002), Brain Activity During Stimulated Deception: An Event-Related Functional Magnetic Resonance Study-Related Functional Magnetic Resonance Study, „NeuroImage” 15 (3): 727–732.


DOI
View in Google Scholar

LeDoux J. (2003), Synaptic Self: How Our Brains Become Who We Are, Penguin Books, Harmondsworth.
View in Google Scholar

Levy N. (2007), Neuroethics. Challenges for the 21st Century, Cambridge University Press, New York.
View in Google Scholar

Liao S.M. (2016), Morality and Neuroscience: Past and Future, [w:] Moral Brains. The Neuroscience of Morality, S.M. Liao (red.), Oxford University Press, New York: 1–42.
View in Google Scholar

Matthews S. (2015), Neuromarketing: What Is It and Is It a Threat to Privacy?, [w:] Handbook of Neuroethics, vol. 3, J. Clausen, N. Levy (red.), Springer, Dordrecht: 1627–1645.
View in Google Scholar

Mathews D.J.H., Rabins P.V., Greenberg B.D. (2011), Deep Brain Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Neuropsychiatric Disorders, [w:] The Oxford Handbook of Neuroethics, J. Illes, B.J. Sahakian (red.), Oxford University Press, New York: 441–453.
View in Google Scholar

Medina J. (2000), The Genetic Inferno. Inside the Seven Deadly Sins, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
View in Google Scholar

Merkel R. (2015), Neurolaw: Introduction, [w:] Handbook of Neuroethics, vol. 3, J. Clausen, N. Levy (red.), Springer, Dordrecht: 1269–1278.
View in Google Scholar

Moll J., Eslinger P.J., Oliveira-Souza R. (2001), Frontopolar and Anterior Temporal Cortex Activation in a Moral Judgment Task: Preliminary Functional MRI Results in Normal Subjects, „Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria” 59: 657–664.


DOI
View in Google Scholar

Moll J., de Oliveira-Souza R., Eslinger P.J., Bramati I.E., Mourão-Miranda J., Andreiulo P.A., Pesoa L. (2002), The Neural Correlates of Moral Sensitivity: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Basic and Moral Emotions, „Journal of Neuroscience” 22 (7): 2730–2736.


DOI
View in Google Scholar

Morrison L. (2009), ECT: Shocked Beyond Belief, „Australasian Psychiatry” 17 (2): 164–167.


DOI
View in Google Scholar

Oliveira-Souza R., Zahn R., Moll J. (2017), Neural Correlates of Human Morality: An Overview, [w:] The Moral Brain. A Multidisciplinary Perspective, J. Decety, T. Wheatley (red.), The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA–London: 183–195.
View in Google Scholar

Pinsent A. (2015), Neurotheology, [w:] Handbook of Neuroethics, vol. 3, J. Clausen, N. Levy (red.), Springer, Dordrecht: 1527–1533.
View in Google Scholar

Pontius A.A. (1973), Neuro-ethics of „Walking” in the Newborn, „Perceptual and Motor Skills” 37 (1): 235–245.


DOI
View in Google Scholar

Prinz J. (2006), The Emotional Basis of Moral Judgments, „Philosophical Explorations” 9 (1): 29–43.


DOI
View in Google Scholar

The President’s Council on Bioethics Staff (2010), An Overview of the Impact of Neuroscience Evidence in Criminal Law, [w:] Neuroethics. An Introduction with Readings, M.J. Farah (red.), The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA: 220–231.
View in Google Scholar

Racine E. (2010), Pragmatic Neuroethics. Improving Treatment and Understanding of the Mind-Brain, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA–London.


DOI
View in Google Scholar

Reiner P.B. (2011), The Rise of Neuroessentialism, [w:] J. Illes, B.J. Sahakian (red.), Oxford University Press: New York: 161–175.
View in Google Scholar

Roskies A. (2002), Neuroethics for the New Millennium, „Neuron” 35 (1): 21–23.


DOI
View in Google Scholar

Roskies A. (2003), Are Ethical Judgments Intrinsically Motivational? Lessons From „Acquired Sociopathy”, „Philosophical Psychology” 16 (1): 51–66.


DOI
View in Google Scholar

Roskies A. (2006), A Case Study of Neuroethics: The Nature of Moral Judgment, [w:] Neuroethics. Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice, and Policy, J. Illes (red.), Oxford University Press, New York: 17–32.
View in Google Scholar

Roskies A. (2008), Internalism and the Evidence from Pathology, [w:] Moral Psychology: The Neuroscience of Morality, W. Sinnott-Armstrong (red.), MIT Press: Cambridge MA: 191–206.
View in Google Scholar

Roskies A. (2016), Neuroethics, URL: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/neuroethics [dostęp 19.12.2018].
View in Google Scholar

Safire W. (2007), Vision for a New Field of „Neuroethics”, [w:] Defining Right and Wrong in Brain Science. Essential Readings in Neuroethics, W. Glannon (red.), Dana Press, New York–Washington, D.C.: 7–11.
View in Google Scholar

Sandberg A., Savulescu J. (2011), The Social and Economic Impacts of Cognitive Enhancement, [w:] Enhancing Human Capacities, J. Savulescu, R. Ter Meulen, G. Kahane (red.), Wiley-Blackwell: Malden, MA–Oxford: 92–112.
View in Google Scholar

Saver J., Damasio A. (1991), Preserved Access and Processing of Social Knowledge in a Patient with Acquired Sociopathy Due to Ventromedial Frontal Damage, „Neuropsychologia” 29 (12): 1241–1249.


DOI
View in Google Scholar

Savulescu J., Bostrom N. (red.) (2009), Human Enhancement, Oxford University Press, New York.
View in Google Scholar

Scheffler S. (1994), The Rejection of Consequentialism, Clarendon Press, New York.


DOI
View in Google Scholar

Singer P. (2005), Ethics and Intuitions, „The Journal of Ethics” 9 (3–4): 331–352.


DOI
View in Google Scholar

Singer P. (2002), Famine, Affluence and Morality, [w:] idem, Unsanctifying Human Life. Essays on Ethics, H. Kuhse (red.), Blackwell: 145–156.
View in Google Scholar

Sinnott-Armstrong W. (2016), The Disunity of Morality, [w:] Moral Brains. The Neuroscience of Morality, S.M. Liao (red.), Oxford University Press, New York: 331–353.
View in Google Scholar

Smith M. (2002), The Moral Problem, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.
View in Google Scholar

Suhler Ch., Churchland P. (2011), The Neurobiological Basis of Morality, [w:] The Oxford Handbook of Neuroethics, J. Illes, B.J. Sahakian (red.), Oxford University Press, New York: 33–58.
View in Google Scholar

Tabibnia G., Satpute A.B., Lieberman M.D. (2008), The Sunny Side of Fairness: Preference for Fairness Activates Reward Circuitry (and Disregarding Unfairness Activates Self-Control Circuitry), „Psychological Science” 19 (4): 339–347.


DOI
View in Google Scholar

Unger P. (1996), Living High and Letting Die. Our Illusion of Innocence, Oxford University Press, New York–Oxford.


DOI
View in Google Scholar

Wheatley T., Haidt J. (2005), Hypnotic Disgust Makes Moral Judgments More Severe, „Psychological Science” 16 (10): 780–784.


DOI
View in Google Scholar

Wiseman H., (2016), The Myth of the Moral Brain. The Limits of Moral Enhancement, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA–London.


DOI
View in Google Scholar

Wolpe P.R. (2004), Neuroethics, [w:] Encyclopedia of Bioethics, t. 3, G. Post (red.), MacMillan Reference: New York: 1894–1898.
View in Google Scholar

Zak P. (2010), The Science of Trust, URL = https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rEy6t4afJ1s [dostęp 19.12.2018].
View in Google Scholar

Zak P. (2011), The physiology of moral sentiments, “Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization” 77 (1): 53-65.


DOI
View in Google Scholar

Zak. P. (2005), Trust: A temporary human attachment facilitated by oxytocin, “Behavioral and Brain Sciences” 28 (3): 368-369.


DOI
View in Google Scholar

Zak P. (2012), The Moral Molecule: The New Science of What Makes Us Good or Evil, Bantam Press, London.
View in Google Scholar

Zak P. (2013), The Moral Molecule: The Source of Love and Prosperity, A Plume Book, New York.
View in Google Scholar

Zak P., Kurzban R., Matzner W. (2005), Oxytocin Is Associated with Human Trustworthiness, „Hormones and Behaviour” 48 (5): 522–527.


DOI
View in Google Scholar

Zak P., Stanton A., Ahmadi S. (2007), Oxytocin Increases Generosity in Humans, „Public Library of Science One” 2 (11): 1–5.


DOI
View in Google Scholar