Arguments in contemporary debates on bioethics
Main Article Content
Abstract
Bioethics is understood in this article as one of the areas of applied ethics, i.e. as a philosophical discipline. From its very beginning, bioethics has been an area of controversy among ethicists representing different standpoints. The philosophical character of bioethics does not unambiguously determine the contents of the accepted norms. The reason for this is the fact that contemporary moral philosophy comprises many ethical theories which are the basis not only for bioethics, but also for other areas of applied ethics. Due to their diversity, the theories give diverging moral appraisals and norms. This divergence results from differences in methods of justification and in the anthropological premises accepted at the starting point of each of these theories.
In this article two methods for justifying moral norms are examined, teleological and deontological. While these methods are also employed outside of bioethics, the following three arguments, (1) the playing God argument (2) the slippery slope argument and (3) the obligation for future generations argument, are typical of this discipline. The arguments consist in applying the general methods of justification to determine the moral permissibility of practical advancements in contemporary biomedicine.
Downloads
Article Details
By submitting his/her work to the Editorial Board, the author accepts, upon having his/her text recommended for publication, that Diametros applies the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) license to works we publish. Under this license, authors agree to make articles legally available for reuse, without permission or fees, for any purpose except commercial. Anyone may read, download, copy, print, distribute or reuse these articles without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as the author and original source are properly cited. The author holds the copyright without any other restrictions. Full information about CC-BY-NC: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode.
References
Anscombe [2001] – G.E.M. Anscombe, Modern Moral Philosophy, w: Virtue Ethics, red. R. Crisp, M. Slote, Oxford University Press, Oxford – New York 2001.
View in Google Scholar
Baillie, Casey [2005] – Is Human Nature Obsolete? Genetics, Bioengineering, and the Future of the Human Condition, red. H.W. Baillie, T.K. Casey, Cambridge, MA – London: The MIT Press 2005.
View in Google Scholar
Beauchamp [1996] – T. L. Beauchamp, J.F. Childress, Zasady etyki medycznej, tłum. W. Jacó- rzyński, Książka i Wiedza, Warszawa 1996.
View in Google Scholar
Betanar [2006] – D. Betanar, Better Never to Have Been. The Harm of Coming into Existence, Clarendon Press, Oxford 2006.
View in Google Scholar
Birnbacher [1999] – D. Birnbacher, Odpowiedzialność za przyszłe pokolenia, tłum. B. Andrze- jewski, P. Jackowski, Oficyna Naukowa, Warszawa 1999.
View in Google Scholar
Broad [1944] – C.D. Broad, Five Types of Ethical Theory, New York 1944.
View in Google Scholar
Burges [1993] – J.A. Burges, The great slippery-slope argument, „Journal of Medical Ethics” 19 (1993).
View in Google Scholar
Caputo [2000] – J.D. Caputo, The End of Ethics, w: The Blackwell Guide to Ethical Theory, Blackwell, Oxford 2000.
View in Google Scholar
Chadwick [1990] – R. Chadwick, Playing God, „Bioethics News” 9(1990), s. 38-46.
View in Google Scholar
Dancy [2004] – J. Dancy, Ethics without Principles, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2004.
View in Google Scholar
Fenberg [1987] – J. Feinberg, Harm to Others. The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law, Oxford University Press, New York – Oxford 1987.
View in Google Scholar
Frankena [1973] – W. Frankena, Ethics, Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall, Inc., New Jersey 1973.
View in Google Scholar
Glover [2006] – J. Glover, Choosing Children. The Ethical Dilemmas of Genetic Intervention, Clarendon Press, Oxford 2006.
View in Google Scholar
Govier [1982] – T. Govier, What‘s Wrong with Slippery Slope Arguments?, „Canadian Journal of Philosophy” 12(1982), nr 2.
View in Google Scholar
Harman [1997] – G. Harman, The Nature of Morality, Oxford University Press, New York – Oxford, 1977.
View in Google Scholar
Häyry [1994] – M. Häyry, Categorical Objections to Genetic Engineering – a Critique, w: Ethics and Biotechnology, red. A. Dyson, J. Harris, Routledge, New York – London, 1994.
View in Google Scholar
Heyd [1992] – D. Heyd, Genethics. Moral Issues in the Creation of People, Oxford University Press, Berkeley – Los Angeles – Oxford 1992.
View in Google Scholar
Hildebrand [1971] – D. Von Hildebrand, Das Wesen der Liebe. Gesammelte Werke, t. III, Re- gensburg: Josef Habel 1971.
View in Google Scholar
Höffe [1993] – O. Höffe, Moral als Preis der Moderne. Ein Versuch über Wissenschaft, Technik und Umwelt, Suhrkampf, Frankfurt am Main 1993.
View in Google Scholar
Holtung [1993] – N. Holtung, Human Gene Therapy: Down the Slippery Slope?, „Bioethics” 7 (1993).
View in Google Scholar
Holtung [1997] – N. Holtung, Altering Humans – The Case For and Against Human Gene Therapy, „Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics” 6 (1997).
View in Google Scholar
Jonas [19872] – H. Jonas, Technik, Medizin und Ethik. Zur Praxis des Prinzips Verantwortung, Insel, Frankfurt am Main 19872.
View in Google Scholar
Jonas [1996] – H. Jonas, Zasada odpowiedzialności. Etyka dla cywilizacji technologicznej, tłum. M. Klimowicz, Kraków 1996.
View in Google Scholar
Jonsen, Toulmin [1989] – A.R. Jonsen, S. Toulmin, The Abuse of Casuistry. A History of Moral Reasoning, University of California Press, Berkeley – Los Angeles – London 1989.
View in Google Scholar
Kalinowski [1993] – J. Kalinowski, Logika norm, Daimonion. Instytut Wydawniczy Lublin, Lublin 1993.
View in Google Scholar
Kant [1995] – I. Kant, Die Metaphysik der Sitten, w: tenże, Die Religion innerhalb der Grenzen der blosen Vernunft. Die Metaphysik der Sitten, Werke, t. 5, Köln: Könemann 1995.
View in Google Scholar
Keller [1957] – J. Keller, Etyka katolicka, PAX, Warszawa 1957.
View in Google Scholar
Kerridge, Mitchell [1996] – I.H. Kerridge, K.R. Mitchell, The legislation of active voluntary euthanasia in Australia: will the slippery slope prove fatal?, „Journal of Medical Ethics” 22(1996).
View in Google Scholar
Lamb [1988] – D. Lamb, Down the slippery slope: arguing in applied ethics, London 1988.
View in Google Scholar
Lauritzen [2005] – P. Lauritzen, Stem Cells, Biotechnology, and Human Rights. Implications for a Posthuman Future, „The Hastings Center Report”, 35(2005), nr 2.
View in Google Scholar
Louden [2000] – R.L. Louden, Kant’s Impure Ethics, Oxford University Press, New York – Oxford 2000, s. 182.
View in Google Scholar
Maritain [2001] – J. Maritain, Dziewięć wykładów o podstawowych pojęciach filozofii moralnej, tłum. J. Merecki, RW KUL, Lublin 2001.
View in Google Scholar
McGleenan [1995] – T. McGleenan, Human gene therapy and slippery slope arguments, „Jour- nal of Medical Ethics” 21(1995).
View in Google Scholar
Mill [2005] – J.St. Mill, Utylitaryzm. O Wolności, tłum. M. Ossowska, A. Kurlandzka, Wy- dawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa 2005.
View in Google Scholar
Mulgan [2006] – T. Mulgan, Future People. A Moderate Consequentialist Account of our Obli- gations to Future Generations, Clarendon Press, Oxford 2006.
View in Google Scholar
Nida [1996] – J. Nida- Rümelin, Ethik des Risikos, w: Angewandte Ethik. Die Bereichsethiken und ihre theoretische Fundierung, Kröner, Stuttgart 1996.
View in Google Scholar
Ossowska [1994] – M. Ossowska, Podstawy nauki o moralności, red. P.J. Smoczyński, Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich, Wrocław – Warszawa – Kraków 1994.
View in Google Scholar
President’s Commission [1982] – President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Prob- lems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research, Splicing Life: A Report on the Social and Ethical Issues of Genetic Engineering with Human Beings, U.S. Gov- ernment Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 1982.
View in Google Scholar
Rawls [1994] – J. Rawls, Teoria sprawiedliwości, tłum. M. Panufnik, J. Pasek, A. Romaniuk, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa 1994.
View in Google Scholar
Reiss [1997] – M.J. Reiss, R. Straughan, Poprawianie natury, tłum. J. Fronk, Amber, Wars- zawa 1997.
View in Google Scholar
Schauer [1985] – F. Schauer, Slippery Slopes, „Harvard Law Review” 99(1985), nr 2.
View in Google Scholar
Sikora, Barry [1978] – Obligations to Future Generations, red. R.I. Sikora, B. Barry, Temple University Press, Philadelphia 1978.
View in Google Scholar
Spaemann [1981] – R. Spaemann, Über die Unmöglichkeit einer universaltheologischen Ethik, „Philosophische Jahrbuch”, 88(1981).
View in Google Scholar
Spaemann [2001] – R. Spaemann, Osoby. O różnicy między czymś a kimś, tłum. J. Merecki, Oficyna Naukowa, Warszawa 2001.
View in Google Scholar
Ślipko [2002] – T. Ślipko, Zarys etyki ogólnej, Wydawnictwo WAM, Kraków 2002.
View in Google Scholar
Verhey [1995] – A. Verhey, „Playing God” and invoking a perspective, „The Journal of Medi- cine and Philosophy”, 20(1995).
View in Google Scholar
Walton [1992] – D. Walton, Slippery Slope Arguments, Clarendon Press, Oxford 1992. Williams [2006] – B. Williams, Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy, London – New York: Routledge 2006.
View in Google Scholar
Wojtyła [1994] – K. Wojtyła, Osoba i czyn, Lublin: TN KUL 1994.
View in Google Scholar
Znamierowski [1957] – Cz. Znamierowski, Oceny i normy, PWN, Warszawa 1957.
View in Google Scholar