Arguments in contemporary debates on bioethics

Main Article Content

Barbara Chyrowicz

Abstract

Bioethics is understood in this article as one of the areas of applied ethics, i.e. as a philosophical discipline. From its very beginning, bioethics has been an area of controversy among ethicists representing different standpoints. The philosophical character of bioethics does not unambiguously determine the contents of the accepted norms. The reason for this is the fact that contemporary moral philosophy comprises many ethical theories which are the basis not only for bioethics, but also for other areas of applied ethics. Due to their diversity, the theories give diverging moral appraisals and norms. This divergence results from differences in methods of justification and in the anthropological premises accepted at the starting point of each of these theories.

In this article two methods for justifying moral norms are examined, teleological and deontological. While these methods are also employed outside of bioethics, the following three arguments, (1) the playing God argument (2) the slippery slope argument and (3) the obligation for future generations argument, are typical of this discipline. The arguments consist in applying the general methods of justification to determine the moral permissibility of practical advancements in contemporary biomedicine.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Chyrowicz, Barbara. 2009. “Arguments in Contemporary Debates on Bioethics”. Diametros, no. 19 (March):1-25. https://doi.org/10.13153/diam.19.2009.326.
Section
Articles
Author Biography

Barbara Chyrowicz

dr hab. Barbara Chyrowicz SSpS, profesor KUL; etyk, kierownik Katedry Etyki Szczegółowej KUL, autorka ponad 70 publikacji naukowych, w tym dwóch książek: Zamiar i skutki. Filozoficna analiza zasady podwójnego skutku (1997), Bioetyka i ryzyko. Argument "równi pochyłej" w dyskusji wokół osiągnięć współczesnej genetyki (2000 i 2002). Redaktor serii wydawniczej "Etyka i Technika".
Share |

References

Anscombe [2001] – G.E.M. Anscombe, Modern Moral Philosophy, w: Virtue Ethics, red. R. Crisp, M. Slote, Oxford University Press, Oxford – New York 2001.
View in Google Scholar

Baillie, Casey [2005] – Is Human Nature Obsolete? Genetics, Bioengineering, and the Future of the Human Condition, red. H.W. Baillie, T.K. Casey, Cambridge, MA – London: The MIT Press 2005.
View in Google Scholar

Beauchamp [1996] – T. L. Beauchamp, J.F. Childress, Zasady etyki medycznej, tłum. W. Jacó- rzyński, Książka i Wiedza, Warszawa 1996.
View in Google Scholar

Betanar [2006] – D. Betanar, Better Never to Have Been. The Harm of Coming into Existence, Clarendon Press, Oxford 2006.
View in Google Scholar

Birnbacher [1999] – D. Birnbacher, Odpowiedzialność za przyszłe pokolenia, tłum. B. Andrze- jewski, P. Jackowski, Oficyna Naukowa, Warszawa 1999.
View in Google Scholar

Broad [1944] – C.D. Broad, Five Types of Ethical Theory, New York 1944.
View in Google Scholar

Burges [1993] – J.A. Burges, The great slippery-slope argument, „Journal of Medical Ethics” 19 (1993).
View in Google Scholar

Caputo [2000] – J.D. Caputo, The End of Ethics, w: The Blackwell Guide to Ethical Theory, Blackwell, Oxford 2000.
View in Google Scholar

Chadwick [1990] – R. Chadwick, Playing God, „Bioethics News” 9(1990), s. 38-46.
View in Google Scholar

Dancy [2004] – J. Dancy, Ethics without Principles, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2004.
View in Google Scholar

Fenberg [1987] – J. Feinberg, Harm to Others. The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law, Oxford University Press, New York – Oxford 1987.
View in Google Scholar

Frankena [1973] – W. Frankena, Ethics, Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall, Inc., New Jersey 1973.
View in Google Scholar

Glover [2006] – J. Glover, Choosing Children. The Ethical Dilemmas of Genetic Intervention, Clarendon Press, Oxford 2006.
View in Google Scholar

Govier [1982] – T. Govier, What‘s Wrong with Slippery Slope Arguments?, „Canadian Journal of Philosophy” 12(1982), nr 2.
View in Google Scholar

Harman [1997] – G. Harman, The Nature of Morality, Oxford University Press, New York – Oxford, 1977.
View in Google Scholar

Häyry [1994] – M. Häyry, Categorical Objections to Genetic Engineering – a Critique, w: Ethics and Biotechnology, red. A. Dyson, J. Harris, Routledge, New York – London, 1994.
View in Google Scholar

Heyd [1992] – D. Heyd, Genethics. Moral Issues in the Creation of People, Oxford University Press, Berkeley – Los Angeles – Oxford 1992.
View in Google Scholar

Hildebrand [1971] – D. Von Hildebrand, Das Wesen der Liebe. Gesammelte Werke, t. III, Re- gensburg: Josef Habel 1971.
View in Google Scholar

Höffe [1993] – O. Höffe, Moral als Preis der Moderne. Ein Versuch über Wissenschaft, Technik und Umwelt, Suhrkampf, Frankfurt am Main 1993.
View in Google Scholar

Holtung [1993] – N. Holtung, Human Gene Therapy: Down the Slippery Slope?, „Bioethics” 7 (1993).
View in Google Scholar

Holtung [1997] – N. Holtung, Altering Humans – The Case For and Against Human Gene Therapy, „Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics” 6 (1997).
View in Google Scholar

Jonas [19872] – H. Jonas, Technik, Medizin und Ethik. Zur Praxis des Prinzips Verantwortung, Insel, Frankfurt am Main 19872.
View in Google Scholar

Jonas [1996] – H. Jonas, Zasada odpowiedzialności. Etyka dla cywilizacji technologicznej, tłum. M. Klimowicz, Kraków 1996.
View in Google Scholar

Jonsen, Toulmin [1989] – A.R. Jonsen, S. Toulmin, The Abuse of Casuistry. A History of Moral Reasoning, University of California Press, Berkeley – Los Angeles – London 1989.
View in Google Scholar

Kalinowski [1993] – J. Kalinowski, Logika norm, Daimonion. Instytut Wydawniczy Lublin, Lublin 1993.
View in Google Scholar

Kant [1995] – I. Kant, Die Metaphysik der Sitten, w: tenże, Die Religion innerhalb der Grenzen der blosen Vernunft. Die Metaphysik der Sitten, Werke, t. 5, Köln: Könemann 1995.
View in Google Scholar

Keller [1957] – J. Keller, Etyka katolicka, PAX, Warszawa 1957.
View in Google Scholar

Kerridge, Mitchell [1996] – I.H. Kerridge, K.R. Mitchell, The legislation of active voluntary euthanasia in Australia: will the slippery slope prove fatal?, „Journal of Medical Ethics” 22(1996).
View in Google Scholar

Lamb [1988] – D. Lamb, Down the slippery slope: arguing in applied ethics, London 1988.
View in Google Scholar

Lauritzen [2005] – P. Lauritzen, Stem Cells, Biotechnology, and Human Rights. Implications for a Posthuman Future, „The Hastings Center Report”, 35(2005), nr 2.
View in Google Scholar

Louden [2000] – R.L. Louden, Kant’s Impure Ethics, Oxford University Press, New York – Oxford 2000, s. 182.
View in Google Scholar

Maritain [2001] – J. Maritain, Dziewięć wykładów o podstawowych pojęciach filozofii moralnej, tłum. J. Merecki, RW KUL, Lublin 2001.
View in Google Scholar

McGleenan [1995] – T. McGleenan, Human gene therapy and slippery slope arguments, „Jour- nal of Medical Ethics” 21(1995).
View in Google Scholar

Mill [2005] – J.St. Mill, Utylitaryzm. O Wolności, tłum. M. Ossowska, A. Kurlandzka, Wy- dawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa 2005.
View in Google Scholar

Mulgan [2006] – T. Mulgan, Future People. A Moderate Consequentialist Account of our Obli- gations to Future Generations, Clarendon Press, Oxford 2006.
View in Google Scholar

Nida [1996] – J. Nida- Rümelin, Ethik des Risikos, w: Angewandte Ethik. Die Bereichsethiken und ihre theoretische Fundierung, Kröner, Stuttgart 1996.
View in Google Scholar

Ossowska [1994] – M. Ossowska, Podstawy nauki o moralności, red. P.J. Smoczyński, Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich, Wrocław – Warszawa – Kraków 1994.
View in Google Scholar

President’s Commission [1982] – President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Prob- lems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research, Splicing Life: A Report on the Social and Ethical Issues of Genetic Engineering with Human Beings, U.S. Gov- ernment Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 1982.
View in Google Scholar

Rawls [1994] – J. Rawls, Teoria sprawiedliwości, tłum. M. Panufnik, J. Pasek, A. Romaniuk, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa 1994.
View in Google Scholar

Reiss [1997] – M.J. Reiss, R. Straughan, Poprawianie natury, tłum. J. Fronk, Amber, Wars- zawa 1997.
View in Google Scholar

Schauer [1985] – F. Schauer, Slippery Slopes, „Harvard Law Review” 99(1985), nr 2.
View in Google Scholar

Sikora, Barry [1978] – Obligations to Future Generations, red. R.I. Sikora, B. Barry, Temple University Press, Philadelphia 1978.
View in Google Scholar

Spaemann [1981] – R. Spaemann, Über die Unmöglichkeit einer universaltheologischen Ethik, „Philosophische Jahrbuch”, 88(1981).
View in Google Scholar

Spaemann [2001] – R. Spaemann, Osoby. O różnicy między czymś a kimś, tłum. J. Merecki, Oficyna Naukowa, Warszawa 2001.
View in Google Scholar

Ślipko [2002] – T. Ślipko, Zarys etyki ogólnej, Wydawnictwo WAM, Kraków 2002.
View in Google Scholar

Verhey [1995] – A. Verhey, „Playing God” and invoking a perspective, „The Journal of Medi- cine and Philosophy”, 20(1995).
View in Google Scholar

Walton [1992] – D. Walton, Slippery Slope Arguments, Clarendon Press, Oxford 1992. Williams [2006] – B. Williams, Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy, London – New York: Routledge 2006.
View in Google Scholar

Wojtyła [1994] – K. Wojtyła, Osoba i czyn, Lublin: TN KUL 1994.
View in Google Scholar

Znamierowski [1957] – Cz. Znamierowski, Oceny i normy, PWN, Warszawa 1957.
View in Google Scholar