Virtue ethics in the face of the challenges of environmental ethics: the dispute about the limits of naturalistic ethical discourse

Main Article Content

Jacek Jaśtal

Abstract

The notion of virtue has appeared in various forms in recent works on environmental ethics. In the article I first make use of the opposition between anthropocentrism and anti-anthropocentrism to recall a number of basic distinctions in understanding environmental ethics and to present three ways of understanding virtue in ethics: virtue as the habit of acting in accordance with norms, virtue as outstanding character traits, and virtue as a stable disposition of character leading to personal development and fulfillment. Next, I show that most authors who write about environmental ethics use the notion of virtue very loosely, basing themselves on superficial resemblances between virtue ethics and environmental ethics. I then point out that virtue ethics is based upon a peculiar kind of naturalism and therefore cannot go beyond the horizon of anthropocentrism. Virtue ethics is conceptually unsuited for considering the world of nature. Finally, I consider how virtue ethics might be expanded to enable it to include environmental issues. One way is by expanding the understanding of human needs; another is by extending the concept of society. I conclude that classical virtue ethics is unable to go beyond a paternalistic and anthropocentric understanding of moral issues connected with the environment. However, I do not consider this to be a fundamental flaw but a manifestation of common sense in defining the goals of general ethical theory.

Article Details

How to Cite
“Virtue Ethics in the Face of the Challenges of Environmental Ethics: The Dispute about the Limits of Naturalistic Ethical Discourse”. 2006. Diametros, no. 9 (September): 34-50. https://doi.org/10.13153/diam.9.2006.249.
Section
Ecology and Ethics
Author Biography

Jacek Jaśtal

Dr Jacek Jaśtal, adiunkt w Instytucie Ekonomii, Socjologii i Filozofii Politechniki Krakowskiej. Zajmuje się metaetyką, etyką i filozofią społeczną. Ostatnio wydał antologię tekstów Etyka i charakter (2004), przygotowuje książkę poświęconą teorii emocji w etyce Arystotelesa i współczesnej etyce cnót.

How to Cite

“Virtue Ethics in the Face of the Challenges of Environmental Ethics: The Dispute about the Limits of Naturalistic Ethical Discourse”. 2006. Diametros, no. 9 (September): 34-50. https://doi.org/10.13153/diam.9.2006.249.
Share |

References

Annas [1993] – J. Annas, The Morality of Happiness, Oxford UP 1993, r. II: „Ju- styfication and the Appeal to Nature”.

Brennan [2002] – A. Brennan, Y.-S. Lo, Environmental Ethics, w: Edward N. Zalta ed., The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, URL = http://plato.stanford.edu/ar- chives/sum2002/entries/ethics-environmental/

Cafaro [2005] – Ph. Cafaro, Thoreau, Leopold, and Carson: Toward an Environ- mental Virtue Ethics, w: Sandler [2005].

Flanagan [1996] – O. Flanagan, Ethics Naturalized: Ethics as Human Ecology, w: L. May, M. Friedman, A. Clark eds., Mind and Morals, MIT Press 1996.

Frasz [1993] – G. Frasz, Environmental Virtue Ethics: Towards a New Direction for Environmental Ethics, „Environmental Ethics” 15, 1993.

Gill [1995] – Ch. Gill, „The Norms of Nature”, w: idem., Greek Thought, Oxford UP 1995.

Hull [2005] – R. Hull, All About EVE [Environmental Virtue Ethics], „Ethics & the Environment” 10(1)2005.

MacIntyre [2001] – A. MacIntyre, Dependent Rational Animals, NY 2001.

O’Neill [1993] – J. O’Neill, Ecology, Policy, and Politics, Routledge 1993.

Nussbaum [1995] – M. C. Nussbaum, Aristotle on human nature and the foundation of ethics, w: J.E.J. Altham, R. Harrison eds., World, Mind, and Ethics, Cambridge UP 1995.

Rolson [1993] – H. Rolston III, Environmental Ethics: Values in and Duties to the Nature, w: E. Winkler, J. Coombs eds., Applied Ethics, Blackwell 1993.

Sandler [2005] – R. Sandler, Ph. Cafaro eds., Environmental Virtue Ethics, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers 2005.

Sorabji [1993] – R. Sorabji, Animal Minds and Human Morals. The Origins of the Western Debate, Cornell UP 1993.

Sousa [1985] – R. de Sousa, Argument from Nature, w: D. Copp, D. Zimmerman eds., Morality, Reason, and Truth, Rowman & Allanheld 1985.

Tyburski [1998] – W. Tyburski red., Etyka środowiskowa, Toruń 1998.

Williams [2004] – B. Williams, Truth and Truthfulness, Princeton UP 2004.