Moral dilemmas. A contribution to the debate, with Plutarch in the background

Main Article Content

Jacek Jaśtal

Abstract

The article presents the basic controversy concerning the existence of moral dilemmas. The dominant interpretation of the issue of moral dilemmas within the traditional ethics of principles tends to exclude the possibility of such conflicts by (a) treating them as conflicts of another type, (b) invoking the possibility of creating a hierarchy of obligations, (c) elaborating a different interpretation of emotional phenomena.

One of the principal contemporary alternatives to the ethics of principles is the so-called ethics of virtues. The author attempts to show that according to the latter moral dilemmas must be interpreted as conflicts between desires in situations where even the most virtuous individual is unable to determine whether his desires in fact follow from virtues. The essence of moral dilemmas in this understanding, then, seems to be the issue of knowing one’s nature and the impossibility in some situations of eliminating apprehensions about one’s own moral character.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Jaśtal, Jacek. 2004. “Moral Dilemmas. A Contribution to the Debate, With Plutarch in the Background”. Diametros, no. 2 (December):18-38. https://doi.org/10.13153/diam.2.2004.44.
Section
Articles
Author Biography

Jacek Jaśtal, Politechnika Krakowska

Politechnika Krakowska
Share |

References

Brandt [1954] – R. Brandt, The Definition of An „Ideal Observer” Theory in Ethics, „Philosophy and Phenomenological Research” (15) 1954/55.
View in Google Scholar

Geach [1977] – P. Geach, The Virtues, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1977.
View in Google Scholar

Gowans [1987] – Moral Dilemmas, red. Ch. Gowans, Oxford University Press, Oxford 1987.
View in Google Scholar

Hursthouse [2004] – R. Hursthouse, Normatywna etyka cnót, w: Etyka i charakter, red. J.
View in Google Scholar

Jaśtal, Aureus, Kraków 2004.
View in Google Scholar

Hursthouse [1999] – R. Hursthouse, On Virtue Ethics, Oxford University Press, Oxford 1999.
View in Google Scholar

Jaśtal [2004a] – J. Jaśtal, Etyka cnót, etyka charakteru, w: Etyka i charakter, red. J. Jaśtal, Aureus, Kraków 2004.
View in Google Scholar

Jaśtal [2004b] – J. Jaśtal, Żal, litość i wstyd. Etyka nikomachejska 1110 b 18-24, „Kwartalnik Filozoficzny”(4) 2004.
View in Google Scholar

Louden [2004] – R. Louden, Etyka cnót a stanowisko antyteoretyczne w etyce, w: Etyka i charakter, red. J. Jaśtal, Aureus, Kraków 2004.
View in Google Scholar

MacIntyre [1996] – A. MacIntyre, Dziedzictwo cnoty. Studium z teorii moralności, tłum. A. Chmielewski, PWN, Warszawa 1996.
View in Google Scholar

MacIntyre [1990] – A. MacIntyre, Moral Dilemmas, „Philosophy and Phenomenological Research” (50) 1990.
View in Google Scholar

Mason [1996] – Moral Dilemmas and Moral Theory, red. H. E. Mason, Oxford University Press, Oxford 1996.
View in Google Scholar

McConnell [1996] – T. C. McConnell, Moral Residue and Dilemmas, w: Moral Dilemmas and Moral Theory, red. H. E. Mason, Oxford University Press, Oxford 1996.
View in Google Scholar

Nagel [1997] – T. Nagel, Rozbicie dziedziny wartości, w: idem, Pytania ostateczne, Aletheia, Warszawa 1997.
View in Google Scholar

Plutarch [1955] – Plutarch, Tymoleon, w: idem, Żywoty sławnych mężów, tłum. M. Brożek, Zakład im. Ossolińskich, Wrocław 1955.
View in Google Scholar

Sartre [1957] – J.-P. Sartre, Egzystencjalizm jest humanizmem, tłum. J. Krajewski, A. Rudzińska, Warszawa 1957.
View in Google Scholar

Sinnott-Armstrong [1988] – W. Sinnott-Armstrong, Moral Dilemmas, Basil Blackwell, Oxford 1988.
View in Google Scholar

Williams [1999] – B. Williams, Spójność etyczna, w: idem, Ile wolności powinna mieć wola?, tłum. T. Baszniak, T. Duliński, M. Szczubiałka, Aletheia, Warszawa 1999.
View in Google Scholar

Williams [1985] – B. Williams, Consistency and Realism, w: B. Williams, Problems with the Self, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1985.
View in Google Scholar