Solidarity in the legal frames

Main Article Content

Aleksandra Głos

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to explore the meaning of solidarity and its proper position in the legal frames, with particular focus on health care. Solidarity is often identified with welfare arrangements and social guarantees. In this institutional version, it tends to humiliate citizens and restrict their entrepreneurship. Moreover, administrative solidarity is unable to recognize the actual needs of the most vulnerable members of society, which should be one of its primary concerns. Solidarity, in its original meaning, understood as supportive cooperation of fellow citizens, links their rights and freedoms with mutual duties and responsibilities. Hence, an alternative framework for solidarity should be provided. This framework, committed to the idea of decency, introduces the distinction between the minimum and maximum content of solidarity enforceable by legal means, which should be translated into certain health care practices.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Głos, Aleksandra. 2015. “Solidarity in the Legal Frames”. Diametros, no. 44 (June):204-22. https://doi.org/10.13153/diam.44.2015.771.
Section
Polemics
Author Biography

Aleksandra Głos, Jagiellonian University

Aleksandra GłosPhD CandidateInstitute of PhilosophyJagiellonian University in Krakówul. Grodzka 5231-044 KrakówPoland

E-mail: olaglos@gmail.com

Share |

References

Alsop et al. [2006] – R. Alsop, M. Frost Bertelsen, J. Holland, Empowerment in Practice: From Analysis to Implementation, The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, Washington 2006.
View in Google Scholar

Anderson [1991] – B.R. Anderson, Imagined Communities. Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism, Verso, London 1991.
View in Google Scholar

Banfield [1958] – E.C. Banfield, Moral Basis of a Backward Society, Free Press, Glencoe, IL 1958.
View in Google Scholar

Bayertz [1990] – K. Bayertz, Four Uses of ‘Solidarity’, [in:] Solidarity, K. Bayertz (ed.), Kluwer Academics Publishers, Dodrecht 1999, p. 3–29.
View in Google Scholar

Bogaert et al. [2013] – M. Bogaert, Y. Denier, I. Devisch, K. Rondia, A Review of the Societal and Ethical Issues, [in:] Justice and Solidarity in Priority Setting in Healthcare. Identifying and Discussing the Ethical and Societal Issues in Resource Allocation, The King Baudouin Foundation and the Belgian Advisory Committee on Bioethics, 2013, p. 87–105.
View in Google Scholar

Bohnet [2003] – I. Bohnet, Expressive Law: Framing or Equilibrium Selection?, UC Berkeley Public Law Research Paper (138); available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=452420 [29.05.2015].
View in Google Scholar

Brock [2002] – D. Brock, Priority to the Worse Off in Health Care Resource Prioritization, [in:] Medicine and Social Justice, Margaret Battin (ed.), Oxford University Press, New York 2002, p. 373–389.
View in Google Scholar

Buchanan [1987] – A. Buchanan, “Justice and Charity,” Ethics 97 (3) 1987, p. 558–575.
View in Google Scholar

Buchanan [1975] – J. Buchanan, The Limits of Liberty: Between Anarchy and Leviathan, The University of Chicago, Chicago 1975.
View in Google Scholar

Buyx, Prainsack [2011] – A. Buyx, B. Prainsack, Solidarity: Reflections on an Emerging Concept in Bioethics, The Nuffield Council on Bioethics, 2011.
View in Google Scholar

Buyx [2008] – A. Buyx, “Personal Responsibility for Health as a Rationing Criterion: Why We Don‘t Like It and Why Maybe We Should,” Journal of Medical Ethics (34) 2008, p. 871–874.
View in Google Scholar

Dawson, Verweij [2012] – A. Dawson, M. Verweij, “Solidarity: A Moral Concept in Need of Clarification,” Public Health Ethics (5) 2012, p. 1–5.
View in Google Scholar

Dean [1996] – J. Dean, Solidarity of Strangers: Feminism after Identity Politics, University of California Press, Berkeley 1996.
View in Google Scholar

Dixon, Frolova [2011] – J. Dixon, J. Frolova, “Existential Poverty: Welfare Dependency, Learned Helplessness and Psychological Capital,” Poverty & Public Policy 3 (2) 2011, p. 1–20.
View in Google Scholar

Dworkin [2000] – R. Dworkin, Sovereign Virtue, [in:] The Theory and Practice of Equality, Harvard University Press, Cambridge 2000, p. 65–119.
View in Google Scholar

Durkheim [1983] – E. Durkheim, The Division of Labor in Society, trans. W.D. Halls, New York, Free Press 1997.
View in Google Scholar

Fetchenhauer, Wittek [2006] – D. Fetchenhauer, R. Wittek, Solidarity in the Absence of Ex-ternal Sanctions: A Cross-Cultural Study of Educational Goals and Fair-Share Behavior, [in:] Solidarity and Prosocial Behavior. An Integration of Sociological and Psychological Perspectives, D. Fetchenhauer, A. Flache, B. Buunk, S. Lindenberg (eds.), Springer, New York 2006, p. 191–207.
View in Google Scholar

Frankfurt [1987] – H. Frankfurt, “Equality as a Moral Ideal,” Ethics (98) 1987, p. 21–42.
View in Google Scholar

Frey [1997] – B.S. Frey, “A Constitution for Knaves Crowds Out Civic Virtues,” The Economic Journal 107 (443) 1997, p. 1043–1053.
View in Google Scholar

Gunson [2009] – D. Gunson, “Solidarity and the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights,” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 34 (3) 2009, p. 241–260.
View in Google Scholar

Habermas [1985] – J. Habermas, Die neue Unübersichtlichkeit, Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp 1985.
View in Google Scholar

Harper [1993] – P.S. Harper, “Insurance and Genetic Testing,” Lancet (341) 1993, p. 224–227.
View in Google Scholar

Honneth [1996] – A. Honneth, The Struggle for Recognition: Moral Grammar of Social Con-flicts, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 1996.
View in Google Scholar

Husted [1999] – J. Husted, Insurance, Genetics and Solidarity, [in:] Genetics and Insurance, T. McGleenan, U. Wiesing, F. Ewald (eds.), BIOS, Oxford 1999, p. 1–16.
View in Google Scholar

Jaeggi [2001] – R. Jaeggi, Solidarity and Indifference, [in:] Solidarity in Health and Social Care in Europe, R. ter Meulen, W. Arts, R. Muffels (eds.), Springer Science Business Media, Dordrecht 2001, p. 287–307.
View in Google Scholar

Kolasa [2012] – K. Kolasa, Optymalna alokacja zasobów w ochronie zdrowia, Wolters Kluwer, Warszawa 2012.
View in Google Scholar

Kornai et al [2001] – J. Kornai, K. Eggleston, Welfare, Choice, and Solidarity in Transition Welfare. Reforming the Health Sector in Eastern Europe, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2001.
View in Google Scholar

Lofmark [2007] – R. Lofmark, T. Nilstun, A. Bolmsjo, “From Cure to Palliation: Concept, Decision and Acceptance,” Journal of Medical Ethics (33) 2007, p. 685–688.
View in Google Scholar

Lukes [1999] – S. Lukes, Solidarity and Citizenship, [in:] Solidarity, K. Bayertz (ed.), Kluwer Academics Publishers, Dodrecht 1999, p. 271–281.
View in Google Scholar

Margalit [1996] – A. Margalit, The Decent Society, Harvard University Press, Cambridge 1996.
View in Google Scholar

Margalit [1997] – A. Margalit, “Decent Equality and Freedom: A Postscript,” Social Research (64) 1997, p. 147–160.
View in Google Scholar

NCoB [2011] – NCoB, Biofuels: Ethical Issues, 2011; available at: http://nuffieldbioethics.org/wpcontent/uploads/2014/07/Biofuels_ethical_issues_FULL-REPORT_0.pdf [29.05.2015].
View in Google Scholar

Pepall et al. [2006] – L. Pepall, D. Richards, J. Straub, M. DeBartolo, Crowding Out and Competition in Religious Marketplace, Economics Department, Tufts University 2006.
View in Google Scholar

Prainsack [2013] – B. Prainsack, Taking Solidarity Seriously – Can It Help?, [in:] Justice and Solidarity in priority Setting in Healthcare. Identifying and Discussing the Ethical and Societal Issues in Resource Allocation, The King Baudouin Foundation and the Belgian Advisory Committee on Bioethics, 2013, p. 21–31.
View in Google Scholar

Rawls [1971] – J. Rawls, A Theory of Justice, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA 1971.
View in Google Scholar

Rorty [1989] – R. Rorty, Contingency, Irony and Solidarity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1989.
View in Google Scholar

Schmidt [2007] – H. Schmidt, “Personal Responsibility for Health: Developments Under the German Healthcare Reform,” European Journal of Health Law (14) 2007, p. 241–250.
View in Google Scholar

Schuyt [1998] – K. Schuyt, “The Sharing of Risks and the Risks of Sharing: Solidarity and Social Justice in the Welfare State,” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice (1) 1998, p. 297–311.
View in Google Scholar

Smits [2000] – J.M. Smits, The Good Samaritan in European Private Law; on the Perils of Principles Without a Programme and a Programme for the Future, Inaugural Lecture at Maastricht University 2000; Deventer (Kluwer) 2000; available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=848947 [29.05.2015].
View in Google Scholar

Stawrowski [2014] – Z. Stawrowski, Solidarność, miłosierdzie, sprawiedliwość; available at: http://skarbsolidarnosci.pl/solidarnosc-milosierdzie-sprawiedliwosc-prof-zbigniew-stawrowski/ [29.05.2015].
View in Google Scholar

Ter Meulen [2011] – R. Ter Meulen, “How ‘Decent’ Is a Decent Minimum of Health Care?,” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy (36) 2011, p. 612–623.
View in Google Scholar

Ter Meulen [2012] – R. Ter Meulen, K. Wright, “Family Solidarity and Informal Care: the Case of Care for People with Dementia,” Bioethics (26) 2012, p. 361–368.
View in Google Scholar

Titmuss [1970] – R. Titmuss, The Gift Relationship: From Human Blood to Social Policy, LSE Books, London 1970.
View in Google Scholar

Triantafillou et al. [2010] – J. Triantafillou, Informal Care in the Long-Term Care System European Overview Paper, European Centre for Social Welfare Policy and Research, 2010.
View in Google Scholar

Tocqueville [1997] – A. de Tocqueville, Memoir on Pauperism, Ivan R. Dee, Chicago 1997.
View in Google Scholar

Van Hoyweghen [2010] – I. van Hoyweghen, “Taming the Wild Life of Genes by Law? Genes Reconfiguring Solidarity in Private Insurance,” New Genetics & Society 19 (4) 2010, p. 431–455.
View in Google Scholar

Waldron [1999] – J. Waldron, The Dignity of Legislation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1999.
View in Google Scholar

Waldron [1993] – J. Waldron, Welfare and the Images of Charity, [in:] J. Waldron, Liberal Rights. Collected Papers 1981–1991, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1993, p. 225–250.
View in Google Scholar

WHO [2011] – R. Busse (ed.), Poland: Health System Review. Health Systems in Transition, WHO Regional Office for Europe. On behalf of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, 2011.
View in Google Scholar

Załuski [2012] – W. Załuski, “On the Asymmetry of Values and Duties and Its Implication for Law,” i-lex (16) 2012, p. 153–171.
View in Google Scholar