Solidarity, Equality and the Problem of Private Health Insurance (in Polish)
Main Article Content
Abstract
Private health insurance is a domain of mutually conflicting models of healthcare systems. Most European healthcare systems are built upon the principles of solidarity and equality, and are provided by public entities. But the private health insurance market can threaten these values, limiting solidarity, equality and universality for the sake of cost effectiveness, consumer choice and market competition. The aim of this article is to analyse these risks and present mechanisms for their mitigation, which would allow the construction of effective and socially acceptable models, or private-public partnerships, in this domain.
Downloads
Article Details
By submitting his/her work to the Editorial Board, the author accepts, upon having his/her text recommended for publication, that Diametros applies the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) license to works we publish. Under this license, authors agree to make articles legally available for reuse, without permission or fees, for any purpose except commercial. Anyone may read, download, copy, print, distribute or reuse these articles without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as the author and original source are properly cited. The author holds the copyright without any other restrictions. Full information about CC-BY-NC: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode.
References
Björnberg [2015] – A. Björnberg, EuroHealth Consumer Index 2015, Health Consumer Pow-erhouse 2015.
View in Google Scholar
Borda [2011] – M. Borda, Wybrane aspekty funkcjonowania ubezpieczeń zdrowotnych w krajach europejskich, „Rozprawy Ubezpieczeniowe” (2) 2011, s. 96–105.
View in Google Scholar
Buchanan [1987] – A. Buchanan, Justice and charity, „Ethics” (97/3) 1987, s. 558–575.
View in Google Scholar
Colombo, Tapay [2004] – F. Colombo, N. Tapay, Private Health Insurance in OECD Countries: The Benefits and Costs for Individuals and Health Systems, OECD Health Working Papers 2004, OECD Publishing, Paryż 2015.
View in Google Scholar
Crisp [2003] – R. Crisp, Equality, Priority, and Compassion, „Ethics” (11/3) 2003, s. 745–763.
View in Google Scholar
Daniels [2002] – N. Daniels, Justice, Health and Health Care, Harvard University, URL= https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/benchmark/ndaniels/pdf/justice_health.pdf.
View in Google Scholar
Daniels [1996] – Justice and Justification: Reflective Equilibrium in Theory and Practice, Cambridge Studies in Philosophy and Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, NY 1996.
View in Google Scholar
Faden, Powers [2008] – R. Faden, M. Powers, Social Justice, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2008.
View in Google Scholar
Frankfurt [1987] – H. Frankfurt, Equality as a Moral Ideal, „Ethics” (98/1) 1987, s. 21–43.
View in Google Scholar
Fourie [2016] – C. Fourie, Sufficiency of Capabilities, Social Equality, and Two-Tiered Health Care Systems, [w:] C. Fourie, A. Rid, What is Enough? Sufficiency, Justice and Health, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2016.
View in Google Scholar
Galewicz [2015] – W. Galewicz, Spór o zasady alokacji zasobów zdrowotnych, [w:] W. Galewicz (red.), Sprawiedliwość w medycynie, Universitas, Kraków 2015.
View in Google Scholar
Golinowska et al. [2012] – S. Golinowska et al., Zarys systemu ochrony zdrowia. Polska, WHO/OECD 2012.
View in Google Scholar
Green, Irvine [2013] – D. Green, B. Irvine, Healthcare Systems: Germany, Civitas, Londyn 2013.
View in Google Scholar
Jurkiewicz-Świętek [2012] – I. Jurkiewicz-Świętek, Dobrowolne prywatne ubezpieczenia zdrowotne. Propozycje i debata wokół ich wprowadzenia w Polsce, „Zdrowie Publiczne i Zarządzanie” (10 B) 2012, s. 156–170.
View in Google Scholar
Kornai [2002] – J. Kornai, Solidarność w procesie transformacji, tłum. M. Awdziej, Wydawnictwo Wyższej Szkoły Przedsiębiorczości i Zarządzania, Warszawa 2002.
View in Google Scholar
Krohmal [2007] – B.J. Krohmal, Tiers Without Tears: The Ethics of a Two-Tiered Health Care System, [w:] B. The Oxford Handbook of Bioethics, Steinbock (red.), Oxford University Press, Oxford 2007, s. 175–189.
View in Google Scholar
Lach [2011] – D.E. Lach, Zasada równego dostępu do opieki zdrowotnej, Wolters Kluwer, Warszawa 2011.
View in Google Scholar
Łanda [2011] – K. Łanda, Koszyk świadczeń gwarantowanych a ubezpieczenia zdrowotne, [w:] Ubezpieczenia zdrowotne a koszyki świadczeń, Adamski et al. (red.), CEESTAHC, Kraków/Warszawa, s. 115–137.
View in Google Scholar
Matczak, Pawłowski [2011] – M. Matczak, P. Pawłowski, Ramy prawne funkcjonowania koszyka świadczeń gwarantowanych i prywatnych ubezpieczeń zdrowotnych w Polsce, [w:] Ubezpieczenia zdrowotne a koszyki świadczeń, Adamski et al. (red.), CEESTAHC, Kraków/Warszawa, s. 89–115.
View in Google Scholar
Maarse [2011] – H. Maarse, Dutch health care reform at the crossroads, The Hastings Centre 2011, URL = http://healthcarecostmonitor.thehastingscenter.org/hansmaarse/dutch-health-reform-atacrossroads/#ixzz2H1mo54qQ.
View in Google Scholar
Meulen ter [2011] – R. ter Meulen, How decent is a decent minimum of health care?, „Journal of Medical Philosophy” (36/6) 2011, s. 612–623.
View in Google Scholar
Neumann et al. [2011] – M. Neuman et al., The impact of financial incentives on physician empathy: A study from the perspective of patients with private and statutory health insur-ance, „Patient Education and Counseling” (84/2) 2011, s. 208–216.
View in Google Scholar
OECD [2015] – Fiscal Sustainability of Health Systems Bridging Health and Finance Perspectives, OECD Publishing, Paryż 2015.
View in Google Scholar
Owoc [2009] – J. Owoc, Ubezpieczenia zdrowotne – szanse i zagrożenia, „Wiadomości Ubezpieczeniowe” (2) 2009, s. 102–107.
View in Google Scholar
Parfit [1997] – D. Parfit, Equality and Priority, „Ratio” (10/3) 1997, s. 202–221.
View in Google Scholar
PIU [2011] – Rola prywatnych ubezpieczeń zdrowotnych w systemie ochrony zdrowia. Jak wpływają na dostęp do świadczeń, innowacji i leków, Polska Izba Ubezpieczeń, Warszawa 2011.
View in Google Scholar
PIU [2013] – Rola i funkcja dodatkowych ubezpieczeń zdrowotnych we współczesnych systemach ochrony zdrowia – analiza i rekomendacje dla Polski, Polska Izba Ubezpieczeń, Warszawa 2013.
View in Google Scholar
Putnam [1994] – R.D. Putnam, Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy, Princeton University Press, Princeton 1994.
View in Google Scholar
Samoliński [2013] – B. Samoliński (red.), Dodatkowe ubezpieczenia zdrowotne, Instytut Badań Rynku, Konsumpcji i Koniunktur, Warszawa 2013.
View in Google Scholar
Sowada [2013] – C. Sowada, Łączenie solidaryzmu z wolnością w ubezpieczeniach zdrowotnych, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar, Warszawa 2013.
View in Google Scholar
Venkatapuram [2011] – S. Venkatapuram, Health Justice, Polity Press, Cambridge 2011.
View in Google Scholar
Załuski [2016] – W. Załuski, O egalitaryzmie ekonomicznym, „Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna” (1) 2016, s. 6–30.
View in Google Scholar