Solidarity, Equality and the Problem of Private Health Insurance (in Polish)

Article Sidebar

PDF (Język Polski) Full text (Język Polski)
Published: Mar 26, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13153/diam.51.2017.1030
Keywords:
solidarity equality private health insurance doctrine of sufficiency R. Ter Meulen H. Frankfurt

Main Article Content

Aleksandra Głos
Jagiellonian University

Abstract

Private health insurance is a domain of mutually conflicting models of healthcare systems. Most European healthcare systems are built upon the principles of solidarity and equality, and are provided by public entities. But the private health insurance market can threaten these values, limiting solidarity, equality and universality for the sake of cost effectiveness, consumer choice and market competition. The aim of this article is to analyse these risks and present mechanisms for their mitigation, which would allow the construction of effective and socially acceptable models, or private-public partnerships, in this domain.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Głos, Aleksandra. 2017. “Solidarity, Equality and the Problem of Private Health Insurance (in Polish)”. Diametros, no. 51 (March):28-47. https://doi.org/10.13153/diam.51.2017.1030.
Issue
No. 51 (2017)
Section
Equality in Healthcare

By submitting his/her work to the Editorial Board, the author accepts, upon having his/her text recommended for publication, that Diametros applies the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) license to works we publish. Under this license, authors agree to make articles legally available for reuse, without permission or fees, for any purpose except commercial. Anyone may read, download, copy, print, distribute or reuse these articles without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as the author and original source are properly cited. The author holds the copyright without any other restrictions. Full information about CC-BY-NC:  https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode.

Creative Commons License

Author Biography

Aleksandra Głos, Jagiellonian University

Aleksandra GłosJagiellonian UniversityDepartment of Philosophyul. Grodzka 52Pl-31-044 KrakówE-mail: aleksandra.glos@uj.edu.pl
Share |
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

Björnberg [2015] – A. Björnberg, EuroHealth Consumer Index 2015, Health Consumer Pow-erhouse 2015.
View in Google Scholar

Borda [2011] – M. Borda, Wybrane aspekty funkcjonowania ubezpieczeń zdrowotnych w krajach europejskich, „Rozprawy Ubezpieczeniowe” (2) 2011, s. 96–105.
View in Google Scholar

Buchanan [1987] – A. Buchanan, Justice and charity, „Ethics” (97/3) 1987, s. 558–575.
View in Google Scholar

Colombo, Tapay [2004] – F. Colombo, N. Tapay, Private Health Insurance in OECD Countries: The Benefits and Costs for Individuals and Health Systems, OECD Health Working Papers 2004, OECD Publishing, Paryż 2015.
View in Google Scholar

Crisp [2003] – R. Crisp, Equality, Priority, and Compassion, „Ethics” (11/3) 2003, s. 745–763.
View in Google Scholar

Daniels [2002] – N. Daniels, Justice, Health and Health Care, Harvard University, URL= https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/benchmark/ndaniels/pdf/justice_health.pdf.
View in Google Scholar

Daniels [1996] – Justice and Justification: Reflective Equilibrium in Theory and Practice, Cambridge Studies in Philosophy and Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, NY 1996.
View in Google Scholar

Faden, Powers [2008] – R. Faden, M. Powers, Social Justice, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2008.
View in Google Scholar

Frankfurt [1987] – H. Frankfurt, Equality as a Moral Ideal, „Ethics” (98/1) 1987, s. 21–43.
View in Google Scholar

Fourie [2016] – C. Fourie, Sufficiency of Capabilities, Social Equality, and Two-Tiered Health Care Systems, [w:] C. Fourie, A. Rid, What is Enough? Sufficiency, Justice and Health, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2016.
View in Google Scholar

Galewicz [2015] – W. Galewicz, Spór o zasady alokacji zasobów zdrowotnych, [w:] W. Galewicz (red.), Sprawiedliwość w medycynie, Universitas, Kraków 2015.
View in Google Scholar

Golinowska et al. [2012] – S. Golinowska et al., Zarys systemu ochrony zdrowia. Polska, WHO/OECD 2012.
View in Google Scholar

Green, Irvine [2013] – D. Green, B. Irvine, Healthcare Systems: Germany, Civitas, Londyn 2013.
View in Google Scholar

Jurkiewicz-Świętek [2012] – I. Jurkiewicz-Świętek, Dobrowolne prywatne ubezpieczenia zdrowotne. Propozycje i debata wokół ich wprowadzenia w Polsce, „Zdrowie Publiczne i Zarządzanie” (10 B) 2012, s. 156–170.
View in Google Scholar

Kornai [2002] – J. Kornai, Solidarność w procesie transformacji, tłum. M. Awdziej, Wydawnictwo Wyższej Szkoły Przedsiębiorczości i Zarządzania, Warszawa 2002.
View in Google Scholar

Krohmal [2007] – B.J. Krohmal, Tiers Without Tears: The Ethics of a Two-Tiered Health Care System, [w:] B. The Oxford Handbook of Bioethics, Steinbock (red.), Oxford University Press, Oxford 2007, s. 175–189.
View in Google Scholar

Lach [2011] – D.E. Lach, Zasada równego dostępu do opieki zdrowotnej, Wolters Kluwer, Warszawa 2011.
View in Google Scholar

Łanda [2011] – K. Łanda, Koszyk świadczeń gwarantowanych a ubezpieczenia zdrowotne, [w:] Ubezpieczenia zdrowotne a koszyki świadczeń, Adamski et al. (red.), CEESTAHC, Kraków/Warszawa, s. 115–137.
View in Google Scholar

Matczak, Pawłowski [2011] – M. Matczak, P. Pawłowski, Ramy prawne funkcjonowania koszyka świadczeń gwarantowanych i prywatnych ubezpieczeń zdrowotnych w Polsce, [w:] Ubezpieczenia zdrowotne a koszyki świadczeń, Adamski et al. (red.), CEESTAHC, Kraków/Warszawa, s. 89–115.
View in Google Scholar

Maarse [2011] – H. Maarse, Dutch health care reform at the crossroads, The Hastings Centre 2011, URL = http://healthcarecostmonitor.thehastingscenter.org/hansmaarse/dutch-health-reform-atacrossroads/#ixzz2H1mo54qQ.
View in Google Scholar

Meulen ter [2011] – R. ter Meulen, How decent is a decent minimum of health care?, „Journal of Medical Philosophy” (36/6) 2011, s. 612–623.
View in Google Scholar

Neumann et al. [2011] – M. Neuman et al., The impact of financial incentives on physician empathy: A study from the perspective of patients with private and statutory health insur-ance, „Patient Education and Counseling” (84/2) 2011, s. 208–216.
View in Google Scholar

OECD [2015] – Fiscal Sustainability of Health Systems Bridging Health and Finance Perspectives, OECD Publishing, Paryż 2015.
View in Google Scholar

Owoc [2009] – J. Owoc, Ubezpieczenia zdrowotne – szanse i zagrożenia, „Wiadomości Ubezpieczeniowe” (2) 2009, s. 102–107.
View in Google Scholar

Parfit [1997] – D. Parfit, Equality and Priority, „Ratio” (10/3) 1997, s. 202–221.
View in Google Scholar

PIU [2011] – Rola prywatnych ubezpieczeń zdrowotnych w systemie ochrony zdrowia. Jak wpływają na dostęp do świadczeń, innowacji i leków, Polska Izba Ubezpieczeń, Warszawa 2011.
View in Google Scholar

PIU [2013] – Rola i funkcja dodatkowych ubezpieczeń zdrowotnych we współczesnych systemach ochrony zdrowia – analiza i rekomendacje dla Polski, Polska Izba Ubezpieczeń, Warszawa 2013.
View in Google Scholar

Putnam [1994] – R.D. Putnam, Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy, Princeton University Press, Princeton 1994.
View in Google Scholar

Samoliński [2013] – B. Samoliński (red.), Dodatkowe ubezpieczenia zdrowotne, Instytut Badań Rynku, Konsumpcji i Koniunktur, Warszawa 2013.
View in Google Scholar

Sowada [2013] – C. Sowada, Łączenie solidaryzmu z wolnością w ubezpieczeniach zdrowotnych, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar, Warszawa 2013.
View in Google Scholar

Venkatapuram [2011] – S. Venkatapuram, Health Justice, Polity Press, Cambridge 2011.
View in Google Scholar

Załuski [2016] – W. Załuski, O egalitaryzmie ekonomicznym, „Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna” (1) 2016, s. 6–30.
View in Google Scholar