Dehumanization, lesser evil and the supreme emergency exemption

Article Sidebar

PDF (Polish) PDF
Published: Sep 1, 2010
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13153/diam.23.2010.379

Main Article Content

Yitzhak Benbaji

Abstract

Many believe that if the indiscriminate bombings of German cities at the beginning of World War II were necessary for preventing unlimited spread of Nazism, then the bombings were justified. For, the outcome, in which innocent Germans living in Nazi Germany are killed, was not as bad as the outcome in which the Nazis inflict ethnic cleansing and enslavement on a massive scale. Recently, however, Daniel Statman has advanced a powerful case against this type of justification. I aim in this paper to develop an enriched version of consequentialism which rescues the "lesser evil elucidation" of the Exemption.

Article Details

How to Cite
“Dehumanization, Lesser Evil and the Supreme Emergency Exemption”. 2010. Diametros, no. 23 (September): 5-21. https://doi.org/10.13153/diam.23.2010.379.
Issue
No. 23 (2010)
Section
Special topic – The Ethics of War

By submitting his/her work to the Editorial Board, the author accepts, upon having his/her text recommended for publication, that Diametros applies the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license to the works we publish. Under this license, authors agree to make articles legally available for reuse, without permission or fees. Anyone may read, download, copy, print, distribute or reuse these articles without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as the author and original source are properly cited. The author holds the copyright without any other restrictions. Full information about CC-BY: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.

Author Biography

Yitzhak Benbaji

Bar-Ilan University and Shalom Hartman Institute

How to Cite

“Dehumanization, Lesser Evil and the Supreme Emergency Exemption”. 2010. Diametros, no. 23 (September): 5-21. https://doi.org/10.13153/diam.23.2010.379.
Share |
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

Anscombe [1979] – G.E.M. Anscombe, War and Murder, in: Moral Problems, ed. James Rachels, HarperCollins, New York 1979.

Arneson [2001] – Richard Arneson, Against Rights, ”Philosophical Issues“ (11) 2001.

Benbaji [2005] – Yitzhak Benbaji, Culpable Bystanders, Innocent Threats and the Ethics of Self-Defense, ”Canadian Journal of Philosophy“ (35) 2005.

Benbaji [2009] - Yitzhak Benbaji, Parity, Intransitivity and a Context-Sensitive Degree Analysis of Gradability, ”Australasian Journal of Philosophy“ (87) 2009.

Benbaji [2010] – Yitzhak Benbaji, Contractarianism and Emergency, forthcoming in: Understanding Promises and Agreements: Philosophical Essays, ed. Hanoch Sheinman, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2010.

Coady [2002] – C.A.J. Coady, Terrorism, Just War and Supreme Emergency, in: Terrorism and Justice: Moral Argument in a Threatened World, eds. C.A.J. Coady and Michael O’Keefe, Melbourne University Press, Melbourne 2002.

Coady [2004] – C.A.J. Coady, Terrorism and Innocence, ”The Journal of Ethics“ (8) 2004.

Dworkin [1977] – Ronald Dworkin, Taking Rights Seriously, in: Taking rights Seriously, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA 1977.

Ford [1970] – J.C. Ford, The Morality of Obliteration Bombing, in: War and Morality, ed. Richard Wasserstrom Wadsworth, Belmont, CA 1970.

Frankfurt [1999] – Harry Frankfurt, On the Usefulness of Final Ends, reprinted in: Necessity, Volition and Love, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1999.

Gauthier [1979] – David Gauthier, Thomas Hobbes: Moral Theorist, ”The Journal of Philosophy“ (76) 1979.

Hybron [2002] – Daniel M. Hybron, Moral Monsters and Saints, ”The Monist“ (85) 2002.

Kamm [2000] – Frances M. Kamm, The Doctrine of Triple Effect and Why a Rational Agent Need Not Intend the Means to His End, ”The Aristotelian Society Supplementary” 74 (1) 2000.

Margalit, Motzkin [1996] – Avishai Margalit, Gabriel Motzkin, The Uniqueness of the Holocaust, ”Philosophy and Public Affairs“ (25) 1996.

McMahan [1994] – Jeff McMahan, Self-Defense and the Problem of the Innocent Attacker, ”Ethics“ (104) 1994.

McMahan [2002] – Jeff McMahan, The Ethics of Killing, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2002.

McMahan [2005] – Jeff McMahan, The Basis of Moral Liability to Defensive Killing, ”Philosophical Issues“ (15) 2005.

Nozick [1974] – Robert Nozick, Anarchy, State, and Utopia, Basic Books, New York 1974.

Otsuka [1994] – Michael Otsuka, Killing the Innocent in Self-Defense, ”Philosophy and Public Affairs“ (23) 1994.

Rawls [1999] – John Rawls, The Law of Peoples, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA 1999.

Rodin [2004] – David Rodin, Terrorism without Intention, ”Ethics“ (114) 2004.

Sen [1982] – Amartya Sen, Rights and Agency, ”Philosophy and Public Affairs“ (11) 1982.

Statman [2006] – Daniel Statman, Supreme Emergencies Revisited, ”Ethics“ (117) 2006.

Stocker [1979] – Michael Stocker, Desiring the Bad: An Essay in Moral Psychology, ”The Journal of Philosophy“ (76) 1979.

Toner [2005] – Christopher Toner, Just War and the Supreme Emergency Exemption, ”The Philosophical Quarterly“ (55) 2005.

Walzer [1977] – Michael Walzer, Just and Unjust Wars, Basic Books, New York 1977.

Walzer [2004] – Michael Walzer, Arguing about War, Yale University Press, New Haven 2004.

Walzer [2006] – Michael Walzer, Terrorism and Just War, ”Philosophia“ (34) 2006.