Trustworthy Public Health Advocacy. Reconciling Different Roles for Epidemiologists
During a Health Emergency

Main Article Content

Jan Piasecki
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1298-736X

Abstract

In this commentary on Giubilini et al.’s 2025 paper, Expertise, Disagreement, and Trust in Vaccine Science and Policy: The Importance of Transparency in a World of Experts, I argue that building public trust during health emergencies requires more than addressing uncertainty, expert disagreement and gaps in knowledge—it demands trustworthy public health advocacy. Such advocacy must be explicit, transparent, and evidence-based. I expand Giubilini’s et al. argument and I focus on additional issues specific for epidemiology and public health. I point out that trust hinges on recognizing the multiple roles epidemiologists play in public discourse, that epidemiologists should be explicit about assuming the role of an advocate for specific public health policies, and that these policies are not only compulsory but also oriented toward public health rather than individual interests.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

“Trustworthy Public Health Advocacy. Reconciling Different Roles for Epidemiologists
During a Health Emergency”. 2026. Diametros 23 (86): 21-30. https://doi.org/10.33392/diam.2004.

References

American College of Epidemiology. (2000). Ethics guidelines. https://acepidemiology.org/ethics-guidelines

American Public Health Association. (2024). Public health code of ethics. https://www.apha.org/-/media/files/pdf/membergroups/ethics/code_of_ethics.ashx

BBC. (2020, August 17). Coronavirus: Hundreds gather in Madrid for anti-mask protest. https://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-europe-53802226

Chapman, S. (2001). Advocacy in public health: Roles and challenges. International Journal of Epidemiology, 30(6), 1226–1232. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/30.6.1226

Chemical Manufacturers Association’s Epidemiology Task Group. (1991). Guidelines for good epidemiology practices for occupational and environmental epidemiologic research. Journal of Occupational Medicine, 33(12), 1221–1229. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1800677/

Childress, J. F., Faden, R. R., Gaare, R. D., Gostin, L. O., Kahn, J., Bonnie, R. J., Kass, N. E., Mastroianni, A. C., Moreno, J. D., & Nieburg, P. (2002). Public health: Mapping the terrain. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 30(2), 170–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-720X.2002.tb00384.x

Dowdy, D. W., & Pai, M. (2012). Bridging the gap between knowledge and health: The epidemiologist as accountable health advocate (“AHA!”). Epidemiology, 23(6), 916–918. https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0b013e3182605843

Giubilini, A., Gur-Arie, R., & Jamrozik, E. (2025). Expertise, disagreement, and trust in vaccine science and policy: The importance of transparency in a world of experts. Diametros 22(82), 7–27. https://doi.org/10.33392/diam.1871

International Society for Environmental Epidemiology. (2023). Ethics guidelines for environmental epidemiologists. https://www.iseepi.org/docs/ISEE_Ethics_Guidelines_Adopted_17_Sept_2023.pdf

Jollimore, T. (2021). Impartiality. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2021 ed.). https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/impartiality/

Kass, N. E. (2001). An ethics framework for public health. American Journal of Public Health, 91(11), 1776–1782. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.91.11.1776

Kossowska, M., Szwed, P., & Czarnek, G. (2021). Ideology shapes trust in scientists and attitudes towards vaccines during the COVID-19 pandemic. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(5), 720–737. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302211001946

Krieger, N. (1999). Questioning epidemiology: Objectivity, advocacy, and socially responsible science. American Journal of Public Health, 89(8), 1151–1153. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.89.8.1151

McKeown, R. E., & Weed, D. L. (2002). Ethics in epidemiology and public health II: Applied terms. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 55(10), 739–741. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.56.10.739

Pielke, R. A., Jr. (2007). The honest broker: Making sense of science in policy and politics. Cambridge University Press.

Rothman, K. J., & Greenland, S. (2004). Basic concepts. In W. Ahrens & I. Pigeot (Eds.), Handbook of epidemiology (pp. 3–29). Springer.

Seo, P. (2021). Revisionist history: Seat belts and resistance to public health measures. The Rheumatologist. https://www.the-rheumatologist.org/article/revisionist-history-seat-belts-resistance-to-public-health-measures/

Soskolne, C. L., & Light, A. (1996). Towards ethics guidelines for environmental epidemiologists. The Science of the Total Environment, 184(1–2), 137–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-9697(95)05027-2

Tunnicliffe, J. (2021). Public health, rights, and protest in the age of COVID-19. Active History. https://activehistory.ca/blog/2021/01/27/public-health-rights-and-protest-in-the-age-of-covid-19/

Verweij, M., & Dawson, A. (2006). The meaning of ‘public’ in ‘public health.’ In M. Verweij & A. Dawson (Eds.), Ethics, prevention and the public health (pp. 13–29). Oxford University Press.

Weed, D. L., & McKeown, R. E. (2008). Epidemiology: Observational studies on human populations. In E. J. Emanuel, C. C. Grady, R. A. Crouch, R. K. Lie, F. G. Miller, & D. D. Wendler (Eds.), The Oxford textbook of clinical research ethics (pp. 325–335). Oxford University Press.

Weed, D. L., & Mink, P. J. (2002). Roles and responsibilities of epidemiologists. Annals of Epidemiology, 12(2), 67–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1047-2797(01)00302-7

World Health Organization. (2020). Infodemic. https://www.who.int/health-topics/infodemic