A Holistic Understanding of Death: Ontological and Medical Considerations

Main Article Content

Doyen Nguyen

Abstract

In the ongoing ‘brain death’ controversy, there has been a constant push for the use of the ‘higher brain’ formulation as the criterion for the determination of death on the grounds that brain-dead individuals are no longer human beings because of their irreversible loss of consciousness and mental functions. This essay demonstrates that such a position flows from a Lockean view of human persons. Compared to the ‘consciousness-related definition of death,’ the substance view is superior, especially because it provides a holistic vision of the human person, and coheres with the perennial axiom about the ‘whole and parts.’

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Nguyen, Doyen. 2018. “A Holistic Understanding of Death: Ontological and Medical Considerations”. Diametros 55 (55), 44-62. https://doi.org/10.13153/diam.1175.
Section
Special Topic – Defining Death: Beyond Biology
Author Biography

Doyen Nguyen, Pontifical University of St. Thomas Aquinas

Doyen Nguyen, M.D., S.T.D.
Pontifical University of St. Thomas Aquinas
Rome, Italy

E-mail: btursiopsdn@gmail.com

Doyen Nguyen, M.D., S.T.D., is both a moral theologian
and a physician (specializing in hematopathology).

Share |

References

Accad M. (2015), “Of Wholes and Parts: A Thomistic Refutation of ‘Brain Death’,” Linacre Quarterly 82 (3): 217–234.
View in Google Scholar

Ad Hoc Committee of the Harvard Medical School (1968), “A Definition of Irreversible Coma,” Journal of the American Medical Association 205 (6): 337–340.
View in Google Scholar

Aristotle (2002), De Anima: Books II and III (with passages from book I), D.W. Hamlyn (trans.), Clarendon Press, Oxford.
View in Google Scholar

Bernat J.L. (2006), “The Whole-brain Concept of Death Remains Optimum Public Policy,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 34 (1): 35–43.
View in Google Scholar

Bernat J.L., Culver C.M., Gert B. (1981), “On the Definition and Criterion of Death,” Annals of Internal Medicine 94 (3): 389–394.
View in Google Scholar

Brugger E.C. (2016), “Are Brain Dead Individuals Dead? Grounds for Reasonable Doubt,” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 41 (3): 329–350.
View in Google Scholar

Byrne P.A., O’Reilly S., Quay P.M. (1979), “Brain Death–An Opposing Viewpoint,” Journal of the American Medical Association 242 (18): 1985–1990.
View in Google Scholar

Cantor N.L. (2010), After We Die: The Life and Times of the Human Cadaver, Georgetown University Press, Washington (DC).
View in Google Scholar

Clarke W.N. (1994), Explorations in Metaphysics: Being–God–Person, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame (IN).
View in Google Scholar

Cole D.J. (1993), “Statutory Definitions of Death and the Management of Terminally Ill Patients who may Become Organ Donors after Death,” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 3 (2): 145–155.
View in Google Scholar

Condic M.L. (2016), “Determination of Death: A Scientific Perspective on Biological Integration,” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 41 (3): 257–278.
View in Google Scholar

Guibert E.E., Petrenko A.Y., Balaban C.L., et al. (2011), “Organ Preservation: Current Concepts and New Strategies for the Next Decade,” Transfusion Medicine and Hemotherapy 38 (2): 125–142.
View in Google Scholar

Haycock J.W. (2011), 3D Cell Culture: Methods and Protocols, Humana Press, New York.
View in Google Scholar

Jensen M., Overgaard M. (2011), “Neural Plasticity and Consciousness,” Frontiers in Psychology 2 (Article 191): 1–2.
View in Google Scholar

Korein J. (1997), “Ontogenesis of the Brain in the Human Organism: Definitions of Life and Death of the Human Being and Person,” [in:] Advances in Bioethics: New Essays on Abortion and Bioethics, R.B. Edwards (ed), JAI Press, Greenwich (CT): 1–74.
View in Google Scholar

Leunissen M. (2007), Explanation and Teleology in Aristotle's Philosophy of Nature, PhD diss., Leiden University, Leiden.
View in Google Scholar

Lizza J.P. (2006), Persons, Humanity, and the Definition of Death, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore (MD).
View in Google Scholar

Lizza J.P. (2018), “Defining Death: Beyond Biology,” Diametros 55: 1–19.
View in Google Scholar

Lock M. (2002), “Inventing a New Death and Making it Believable,” Anthropology & Medicine 9 (2): 97–115.
View in Google Scholar

Locke J. (1975), An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, P.H. Nidditch (ed), Clarendon Press, Oxford.
View in Google Scholar

Moreland J., Mitchell J. (1995), “Is the Human Person a Substance or a Property-thing?” Ethics & Medicine: A Christian Perspective on Issues in Bioethics 11 (3): 50–55.
View in Google Scholar

Moschella M. (2016), “Deconstructing the Brain Disconnection–Brain Death Analogy and Clarifying the Rationale for the Neurological Criterion of Death,” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 41 (3): 279–299.
View in Google Scholar

Nair-Collins M. (2010), “Death, Brain Death, and the Limits of Science: Why the Whole-Brain Concept of Death Is a Flawed Public Policy,” The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 38 (3): 667–683.
View in Google Scholar

Nair-Collins M., Miller F.G. (2017), “Do the ‘Brain Dead’ Merely Appear to be Alive?” Journal of Medical Ethics 43 (11): 747–753.
View in Google Scholar

Nguyen D. (2017a), The New Paradigms of Death for Organ Transplantation: A Critical Analysis from the Perspective of Christian Ethics, S.T.D. diss., Pontifical University of St. Thomas Aquinas, Rome.
View in Google Scholar

Nguyen D. (2017b), “Pope John Paul II and the Neurological Standard for the Determination of Death: A Critical Analysis of his Address to the Transplantation Society,” Linacre Quarterly 84 (2): 155–186.
View in Google Scholar

Pontén U. (1986), “Artificial Prolongation of Life and the Determination of the Exact Moment of Death,” [in:] Working Group on the Artificial Prolongation of Life and the Determination of the Exact Moment of Death, October 19–21, 1985, C. Chagas (ed), Pontificia Academia Scientiarum, Città del Vaticano: 85–94.
View in Google Scholar

President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research (1981), Defining Death: A Report on the Medical, Legal and Ethical Issues in the Determination of Death, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington (DC).
View in Google Scholar

President’s Council on Bioethics (2008), Controversies in the Determination of Death: A White Paper by the President’s Council on Bioethics, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington (DC).
View in Google Scholar

Ramellini P. (2009), “Death in the Biological Literature of Life,” [in:] What is Death?: A Scientific, Philosophical and Theological Exploration of Life's End, A. Aguilar (ed), Libreria Editrice Vaticana, Città del Vaticano: 21–65.
View in Google Scholar

Saposnik G., Basile V.S., Young G.B. (2009), “Movements in Brain Death: A Systematic Review,” Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences 36 (2): 154–160.
View in Google Scholar

Saposnik G., Bueri J.A., Mauriño J., et al. (2000), “Spontaneous and Reflex Movements in Brain Death,” Neurology 54 (1): 221–223.
View in Google Scholar

Schumacher B.N. (2016), “Brain Death and Organ Removal: Revisiting a High-Stakes Question,” Nova et Vetera 14 (4): 1239–1269.
View in Google Scholar

Seifert J. (1997), What is life?: The Originality, Irreducibility, and Value of Life, Rodopi, Amsterdam.
View in Google Scholar

Shewmon D.A. (1999), “Spinal Shock and ‘Brain Death’: Somatic Pathophysiological Equivalence and Implications for the Integrative-unity Rationale,” Spinal Cord 37 (5): 313–324.
View in Google Scholar

Shewmon D.A. (2001), “The Brain and Somatic Integration: Insights into the Standard Biological Rationale for Equating ‘Brain Death’ with Death,” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26 (5): 457–478.
View in Google Scholar

Shewmon D.A. (2004), “The Dead Donor Rule: Lessons from Linguistics,” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 14 (3): 277–300.
View in Google Scholar

Shewmon D.A. (2010), “Constructing the Death Elephant: A Synthetic Paradigm Shift for the Definition, Criteria, and Tests for Death,” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (3): 256–298.
View in Google Scholar

Shewmon D.A. (2012), “You Only Die Once: Why Brain Death is not the Death of a Human Being; A Reply to Nicholas Tonti-Filippini,” Communio 39: 422–494.
View in Google Scholar

Strawson P.F. (1964a), Individuals, Routledge, London.
View in Google Scholar

Strawson P.F. (1964b), “Persons,” [in:] Essays in Philosophical Psychology, D.F. Gustafson (ed), Anchor Books, Garden City (NY): 377–403.
View in Google Scholar

Wiggins D. (1980), Sameness and Substance, Blackwell, Oxford.
View in Google Scholar

Wiggins D. (2001), Sameness and Substance Renewed, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
View in Google Scholar

Zeman A., Grayling A.C., Cowey A. (1997), “Contemporary Theories of Consciousness,” Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery And Psychiatry 62 (6): 549–552.
View in Google Scholar

Zeman A. (2001), “Consciousness,” Brain 124 (7): 1263–1289.
View in Google Scholar

Zeman A. (2006), “What Do We Mean by ‘Conscious’ and ‘Aware’?” Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 16 (4): 356–376.
View in Google Scholar