Main Article Content
The Guest Editor’s Introduction.
This article has a related Erratum: https://doi.org/10.33392/diam.1775
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
By submitting his/her work to the Editorial Board, the author accepts, upon having his/her text recommended for publication, that Diametros applies the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license to the works we publish. Under this license, authors agree to make articles legally available for reuse, without permission or fees. Anyone may read, download, copy, print, distribute or reuse these articles without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as the author and original source are properly cited. The author holds the copyright without any other restrictions. Full information about CC-BY: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.
Broome J. (1991), Weighing Goods. Equality, Uncertainty and Time, Blackwell, Oxford.
Buchak L. (2017a), “Taking Risks behind the Veil of Ignorance,” Ethics 127 (3): 610–644.
Buchak L. (2017b), “Why High-Risk, Non-Expected-Utility-Maximising Gambles Can Be Rational and Beneficial: The Case of HIV Cure Studies,” Journal of Medical Ethics 43 (2): 90–95.
Dreier J. (2004), “Decision Theory and Morality,” [in:] The Oxford Handbook of Rationality, A.R. Mele, P. Rawling (eds), Oxford University Press, Oxford: 156–181.
Eyal N. (2017), “How to Keep High-Risk Studies Ethical: Classifying Candidate Solutions,” Journal of Medical Ethics 42 (2): 74–77.
Hansson S.O. (2003), “Ethical Criteria of Risk Acceptance,” Erkenntnis 59 (3): 291–309.
Hare C. (2017), “Risk and Radical Uncertainty in HIV Research,” Journal of Medical Ethics 43 (2): 87–89.
Kamm F.M. (2017), “The Morality of Risks in Research: Reflections on Kumar,” Journal of Medical Ethics 43 (2): 128–131.
Kumar R. (2017), “Contractualist Reasoning, HIV Cure Clinical Trials, and the Moral (Ir)Relevance Of the Risk/Benefit Ratio,” Journal of Medical Ethics 43 (2): 124–127.
Lazar S. (2017a), “Deontological Decision Theory and Agent-Centered Options,” Ethics 127 (3): 579–609.
Lazar S. (2017b), “Anton’s Game: Deontological Decision Theory for an Iterated Decision Problem,” Utilitas 29 (1): 88–109.
McCarthy D. (2016), “Probability in Ethics,” [in:] The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Probability, A. Hájek, C. Hitchcock (eds), Oxford University Press, Oxford: 705–737.
Rawls J. (2003), A Theory of Justice (Revised Edition), Harvard University Press, Cambridge (MA).
Tenenbaum S. (2017), “Action, Deontology, and Risk: Against the Multiplicative Model,” Ethics 127 (3): 674–707.
Voorhoeve A., Fleurbaey M. (2016), “Priority or Equality for Possible People?” Ethics 126 (4): 929–954.
Wikler D. (2017), “Must Research Benefit Human Subjects if it is to be Permissible?” Journal of Medical Ethics 43 (2): 114–117.
Williams J.R.G. (2017), “Indeterminate Oughts,” Ethics 127 (3): 645–673.