On the concepts of risk and understanding of the principle of its minimization
Main Article Content
Abstract
The following text is a voice in the discussion around normative problems of innovative therapies. It particularly refers to problems related to the concept of risk and the principle of its minimization, also discussed in this issue in the article by Wojciech Załuski "On the Limits of Medical Experiment from the Perspective of Rational Choice Theory.”
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
By submitting his/her work to the Editorial Board, the author accepts, upon having his/her text recommended for publication, that Diametros applies the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license to the works we publish. Under this license, authors agree to make articles legally available for reuse, without permission or fees. Anyone may read, download, copy, print, distribute or reuse these articles without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as the author and original source are properly cited. The author holds the copyright without any other restrictions. Full information about CC-BY: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.
How to Cite
References
Eyal N. (2020), Why Challenge Trials of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines Could Be Ethical Despite Risk of Severe Adverse Events, „Ethics & Human Research” 42(4): 24-34.
Hansson S. O. (2023), Risk, [w:] The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2023 Edition), E. N. Zalta, U. Nodelman (red.), URL = https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2023/entries/risk/ [dostęp 16.02.2024.].
Hope T., McMillan J. (2004), Challenge studies of human volunteers: ethical issues, „Journal of Medical Ethics” 30(1): 110-116.
Naczelna Izba Lekarska (2004), Kodeks Etyki Lekarskiej, Warszawa.
Rid A. (2014), Setting risk thresholds in biomedical research: lessons from the debate about minimal risk, „Monash Bioethics Review” 32(1-2): 63-85.
Rid A. (2020), Ethical Evaluation of Research Risks and Potential Benefits, [w:] The Oxford Hand-
book of Research Ethics, A. S. Iltis, D. MacKay (red.), Oxford University Press, New York: 191-215, URL = https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190947750.013.11 [dostęp 16.02.2024].
Rid A., Wendler D. (2011), A Framework for Risk-Benefit Evaluations in Biomedical Research, „Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal” 21(2): 141-179.
Ustawa z dnia 5 grudnia 1996 r. o zawodach lekarza i lekarza dentysty (Dz.U. z 2023 r. poz. 1516)
Wendler D. (2018), The Ethics of Net-Risk Pediatric Research: Implications of Valueless and Harmful Studies, „IRB: Ethics & Human Research” 40(6): 13-18.
Wendler D., Miller F.G. (2007), Assessing research risks systematically: the net risks test, „Journal of Medical Ethics” 33: 481-486.