Kant and Spinoza on the Old Covenant
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Spinoza is often presented as an important source for Kant’s view on Judaism and the Old Testament. This claim is often made on the basis of the alleged affinity between the relevant ideas of the two thinkers. In this article, I agree with scholars who point out that Spinoza’s direct influence on Kant’s view of the Old Covenant can be doubted, and further argue that the substance of their ideas about the Hebrew Bible is fundamentally different. I discuss their views on biblical hermeneutics (here showing some affinity between them), the Mosaic law (its content and divinity), and especially the significance of Judaism for Christianity, where the discrepancy between Kant and Spinoza regarding the Old Covenant becomes particularly evident.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
By submitting his/her work to the Editorial Board, the author accepts, upon having his/her text recommended for publication, that Diametros applies the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license to the works we publish. Under this license, authors agree to make articles legally available for reuse, without permission or fees. Anyone may read, download, copy, print, distribute or reuse these articles without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as the author and original source are properly cited. The author holds the copyright without any other restrictions. Full information about CC-BY: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.
References
Boehm O. (2014), Kant’s Critique of Spinoza, Oxford, New York.
Brewer K., Watkins E. (2012), “Difficulty Still Awaits: Kant, Spinoza, and the Threat of Theological Determinism,” Kant Studien 103 (2): 163-187.
Carlisle C. (2021), Spinoza’s Religion. A New Reading of the Ethics, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Cohen H. (2009), “Innere Beziehungen der Kantischen Philosophie zum Judentum,” [in:] H. Cohen, Werke, vol. 15: Kleinere Schriften IV (1907–1912), H. Wiedebach (ed.), Georg Olms, Hildesheim, Zürich, New York.
Diestel L. (1869), Geschichte des Alten Testaments in der christlichen Kirche, Mauke’s Verlag, Jena.
Fraenkel C. (2012), Philosophical Religions from Plato to Spinoza, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Franks W.P. (2005), All or Nothing. Systematicity, Transcendental Arguments, and Skepticism in German Idealism, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Graetz M. (1977), “Die Erziehung des Menschengeschlechts und jüdisches Selbstbewusstsein im. 19. Jahrhundert,” [in:] Wolfenbütteler Studien zur Aufklärung, Günter Schulz (ed.), Jacobi Verlag, Wolfenbüttel: 273–297.
Graupe H.M. (1961), “Kant und das Judentum,” Zeitschrift für Religions- und Geistesgeschichte 31 (4): 308–333.
Guttman J. (1908), “Kant und das Judentum,” [in:] N. Porges, Joseph Bechor Schor: ein nordfranzösischer Bibelerklärer des XII Jahrhunderts, J. Guttmann, Kant und das Judentum. Zwei Vorträge gehalten in der Generalversammlung der Gesellschaft am 23. Dezember 1907 zu Berlin, Gesellschaft der Wissenschaft des Judentums (ed.), Gustav Fock, Leipzig: 40–61.
Halbertal M. (1997 ), People of the Book: Cannon, Meaning, and Authority, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, London.
Heman F. (1901), “Kant und Spinoza,” Kant-Studien 5 (1–3): 273–339.
Huenmann Ch. (2014), Spinoza’s Radical Theology. The Metaphysics of the Infinite, Routledge, London and New York.
Hunter G. (2017), Radical Protestantism in Spinoza’s Thought, Routledge, London, New York.
Kalweit P. (1904), Kants Stellung zur Kirche, Thomas & Oppermann, Königsberg.
Kant I. (1996a), “Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason,” trans. G. di Giovanni, [in:] I. Kant, Religion and Rational Theology, Cambridge University Press, New York: 39–217.
Kant I. (1996b), “The Conflict of the Faculties,” trans. M.J. Gregor, R. Anchor, [in:] I. Kant, Religion and Rational Theology, Cambridge University Press, New York: 223–329.
Klemme H. F. (2003), “Einleitung,” [in:] I. Kant, Kritik der praktischen Vernunft, H.D. Brandt, H.F. Klemme (eds.), Felix Meiner, Hamburg.
Kozyra W. (2022), “The Gospel of the New Principle: The Marcionian Leitmotif in Kant’s Religious Thought in the Context of Thomas Morgan and the German Enlightenment,” [in:] Between Secularization and Reform. Religion in the Enlightenment, A. Tomaszewska (ed.), Leiden and Boston, Brill: 319–347.
Kozyra W. (2020), “Kant on the Jews and their Religion,” Diametros 17(65): 32–55.
Kupś T. (2008), Filozofia religii Immanuela Kanta, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika, Toruń.
Langtahler R. (2021), Kant – ein Kritiker Lessings? Übereinstimmungen und Differenzen im Kontext von Religion und Aufklärung, De Gruyter, Berlin.
Lehner U.L. (2005), “Einführung,” [in:] M. Knutzen, Philosophischer Beweis von der Wahrheit der christlichen Religion, U.L. Lehner (ed.), Vertrag Traugott Bautz, Nordhausen: vii-xliv.
Levene N. (2004), Spinoza’s Revelation. Religion, Democracy, and Reason, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Levine A. (2006), The Misunderstood Jew. The Church and the Scandal of the Jewish Jesus, Harper, San Francisco.
Lord B. (2011). Kant and Spinozism Transcendental Idealism and Immanence from Jacobi to Deleuze, Palgrave Macmillan, London.
Löwenbrück A.R. (1988), “Johann David Michaelis‘ Verdienst um die philologisch historische Bibelkritik,” [in:] Historische Kritik und biblischer Kanon in der deutschen Aufklärung, Henning Graf Raventlow, Walter Sparn, and John Woodbridge (eds.), Harrassowitz,
Wiesbaden: 157–171.
Luther M. (1983), “Ein Unterricht, wie die Christen sich in Mose sollen schicken,” [in:] M. Luther, Ausgewählte Schriften: Erneuerung von Frömmigkeit und Theologie, Insel Verlag, Frankfurt: 206–225.
Luther M. (2019), “Wieder die Sabbater,” [in:] M. Luther, Dass Jesus Christus ein geborener Jude sei und andere Judenschriften, Matthias Morgenstern (ed.), Berlin University Press, Berlin: 56–113.
Mack M. (2003), German Idealism and the Jew. The Inner Anti-Semitism of Philosophy and German Jewish Responses, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.
Munk R. (2006), “Mendelssohn and Kant on Judaism,” Jewish Studies Quarterly 13 (3): 215–222.
Nierenberg D. (2013), Anti-Judaism. The Western Tradition, W.W. Norton and Company, London and New York.
Novak D. (1998), Natural Law in Judaism, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Reardon B.M.G. (1988), Kant as Philosophical Theologian, Macmillan Press, Hampshire, London.
Schulte Ch. (2002), Die jüdische Aufklärung: Philosophie, Religion, Geschichte, C.H. Beck, München.
Semler J. S. (1771), Abhandlung Von Freier Untersuchung Des Canon, Halle.
Soulen R. Kendall (1996), The God of Israel and Christian Theology, Minneapolis, Fortress.
Spinoza B. (1985), “Letters: July 1664-September 1665,” trans. Edwin Curly [in:] B. Spinoza, The Collected Works of Spinoza, E. Curley (ed.), Volume I, Princeton University Press, Oxford: 349–397.
Spinoza B. (2007), Theological-Political Treatise, trans. J. Israel, M. Silverthorne, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Spinoza B. (2016), Theological-Political Treatise, trans. Edwin Curley, [in:] B. Spinoza, The Collected Works of Spinoza, E. Curley (ed.), Volume II, Princeton University Press, Princeton, Oxford: 65–357.
Tillkorn A. (2012), Motivationen für das Selbst. Kant und Spinoza im Vergleich, A. Tillkorn (ed.), Harrassowitz, Wiesbaden.
Tomaszewska A. (2017), “The Divine Immanence, Kant’s Religious Rationalism, and Spinoza,” [in:] A. Tomaszewska, Hasse Hämäläinen (eds.), The Sources of Secularism. Enlightenment and Beyond, Palgrave Macmillan, London 207–229.
Tomaszewska A. (2022), Kant’s Rational Religion and the Radical Enlightenment: From Spinoza to Contemporary Debates, Bloomsbury, New York.
Warda A. (1922), Immanuel Kants Bücher, Berlin.
Wood A. (2020), Kant and Religion, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Yovel Y. (1973), “Bible Interpretation as Philosophical Praxis: A Study of Spinoza and Kant,” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 11 (2): 189–212.