Kant on the Jews and their Religion

Main Article Content

Wojciech Kozyra


The main focus of the article is the analysis of Kant’s notion of Judaism and his attitude toward the Jewish nation in a new context. Kant’s views on the Jewish religion are juxtaposed with those of Mendelssohn and Spinoza in order to emphasize several interesting features of Kant’s political and religious thought. In particular, the analysis shows that, unlike Mendelssohn, Kant did not consider tolerance to be the last word of the enlightened state in matters of its coexistence with religion. The author also argues that Kant’s fascination with Mendelssohn’s Jerusalem was premature and that his later disappointment with Mendelssohn’s persistent adherence to Jewish orthodoxy reflects his understanding of the condition of Judaism in the context of the new era of Enlightenment. Moreover, the paper addresses in a novel way the relevant connections between Kant and Spinoza, showing substantive similarities between their notions of Judaism and Christianity, and provides an overview of Kant’s historical involvement with Jewish issues, which are significant given the argumentative structure of the article.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Kozyra, Wojciech. 2020. “Kant on the Jews and Their Religion ”. Diametros 17 (65):32-55. https://doi.org/10.33392/diam.1540.
Share |


Altman A. (1973), Moses Mendelssohn. A Biographical Study, The Jewish Publication Society of America, Philadelphia.

Altman A. (1983), Introduction, [in:] M. Mendelssohn, Jerusalem, or, On the Religious Power and Judaism, trans. A. Arkush, University Press of New England, Hanover, London: 1–31.

Ascher S. (1794), Eisenmenger der Zweite, K.L. Hartmann, Berlin.

Arkush A. (1994), Moses Mendelssohn and the Enlightenment, State University of New York Press, Albany.

Bendavid L. (1793), Etwas zur Charakteristik der Juden, Joseph Stabel, Leipzig.

Bohatec J. (1966), Die Religionsphilosophie Kants in der Religion innerhalb der Grenzen der bloßen Vernunft mit besonderer Berücksichtigung ihrer theologisch-dogmatischen Quellen, Georg Olms, Hildesheim.

Cohen H. (2009), Innere Beziehungen der Kantischen Philosophie zum Judentum, [in:] H. Cohen, Werke. vol. 15: Kleinere Schriften IV (1907–1912), H. Wiedebach (ed.), Georg Olms, Hildesheim, Zürich, New York.

Dietzsch S. (2003), Immanuel Kant. Eine Biographie, Reclam, Leipzig.

Eckstein W. (1944), “Rousseau and Spinoza: Their Political Theories and Their Conception of Ethical Freedom,” Journal of the History of Ideas 5 (3): 259–291.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2707351

Feiner S. (2010), Moses Mendelssohn: Sage of Modernity, trans. Anthony Berris, Yale University Press, New Heaven, London.

Fichte J.G. (1793), Beitrag zur Berichtigung der Urteile des Publikums über die französische Revolution. Erster Teil. Zur Beurteilung ihrer Rechtmäßigkeit, Ferdinand Troschel, Danzig.

Franks P.W. (2007), The Jewish Philosophy after Kant: The Legacy of Salomon Maimon, [in:] The Cambridge Companion to Modern Jewish Philosophy, M.L. Morgan, P. Gordon (eds.), Cambridge University Press, New York: 53–79.

Guttman J. (1908), Kant und das Judentum, [in:] N. Porges, Joseph Bechor Schor: ein nordfranzösischer Bibelerklärer des XII Jahrhunderts, J. Guttmann, Kant und das Judentum. Zwei Vorträge gehalten in der Generalversammlung der Gesellschaft am 23. Dezember 1907 zu Berlin, Gesellschaft der Wissenschaft des Judentums (ed.), Gustav Fock, Leipzig: 40–61.

Gottlieb M. (2011), Faith and Freedom. Moses Mendelssohn’s Theological-Political Thought, Oxford University Press, New York.

Graupe H.M. (1961), “Kant und das Judentum,” Zeitschrift für Religions- und Geistesgeschichte 31 (4): 308–333.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/157007361X00091

Guyer P. (2020), Reason and Experience in Mendelssohn and Kant, Oxford University Press, New York.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198850335.001.0001

Halbertal M. (1997), People of the Book: Cannon, Meaning, and Authority, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, London.

Heine H. (1997), Zur Geschichte der Religion und Philosophie in Deutschland, Reclam, Stuttgart.

Heman F. (1901), “Kant und Spinoza,” Kant-Studien 5 (1–3): 273–339.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/kant-1901-0157

Hirschel M. (1788), Kampf der jüdischen Hierarchie mit der Vernunft, W.G. Korn, Breslau.

Hunter G. (2017), Radical Protestantism in Spinoza’s Thought, Routledge, London, New York.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315245393

Kaufmann W. (2009), Goethe, Kant, and Hegel: Discovering the Mind, vol. 1, Transaction, New Brunswick, London.

Kant I. (1986), Briefwechsel, R. Malter, J. Kopper (eds.), Felix Meiner, Hamburg.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.28937/978-3-7873-2573-3

Kant I. (1987), Critique of Judgment, trans. W.S. Pluhar, Hackett, Indianapolis, Cambridge.

Kant I. (1996a), Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason, trans. G. di Giovanni, [in:] I. Kant, Religion and Rational Theology, Cambridge University Press, New York: 39–217.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511814433.005

Kant I. (1996b), The Conflict of the Faculties, trans. M.J. Gregor, R. Anchor, [in:] I. Kant, Religion and Rational Theology, Cambridge University Press, New York: 223–329.

Kant I. (1996c), Toward Perpetual Peace, trans. M.J. Gregor, [in:] I. Kant, Practical Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, New York: 311–353.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813306.012

Kant I. (1999), Correspondence, trans. A. Zweig, Cambridge University Press, New York.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511527289

Kant I. (2007), Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View, trans. M. Gregor, [in:] I. Kant, Anthropology, History and Education, Cambridge University Press, New York: 227–430.

Kant I. (2011), Remarks in the Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and Sublime, trans. T. Hilgers, U. Abacý, M. Nance, [in:] I. Kant, Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and Sublime and Other Writings, Cambridge University Press, New York: 65–205.

Keenecke A. (2007), Isaac Abraham Euchel: Architekt der Haskala, Wallstein, Göttingen.

Kisner M. (2011), Spinoza on Human Freedom: Reason, Autonomy and the Good Life, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Kozyra W. (2018), “Is Spinoza’s Ethics Heteronomous in the Kantian Sense of the Term?,” Kantian Journal 37 (4): 35–66.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5922/0207-6918-2018-4-2

Kozyra W. (2019), “Jeszajahu Lejbowic: Kant, judaizm, humanizm,” Przegląd Filozoficzny – Nowa Seria 2 (28): 115–123.

Kupś T. (2008), Filozofia religii Immanuela Kanta, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika, Toruń.

Lazarus M. (1898), Die Ethik des Judenthums, J. Kauffmann Verlag, Frankfurt am Main.

Leibowitz Y. (1994), Gespräche über Gott und die Welt, interview by Michael Shashar, trans. M. Schmidt, Insel Verlag, Frankfurt am Main, Leipzig.

Lessing G.E. (1959), Die Erziehung des Menschengeschlechts, [in:] G.E. Lessing, Gesammelte Werke I, W. Stammler (ed.), Carl Hanser, München: 1010–1035.

Maimon S. (2018), The Autobiography of Solomon Maimon, trans. P. Reitter, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400890446

Meyer M.A. (1995), Response to Modernity. A History of the Reform Movement in Judaism, Wayne State University Press, Detroit.

Mendelssohn M. (1782), Vorrede, trans. M. Herz, [in:] Manasseh Ben Israel, Rettung der Juden, Friedrich Nicolai, Berlin, Stettin.

Mendelssohn M. (1983), Jerusalem: Or, on the Religious Power and Judaism, trans. A. Arkush, University Press of New England, Hanover, London.

Mendelssohn M. (1997), On the Question: What Does ‘To Enlighten’ Mean?, trans. D.O. Dahlstrom, [in:] M. Mendelssohn, Philosophical Writings, Cambridge University Press, New York: 311–318.

Mendelssohn M. (2011a), Morning Hours. Lectures on God’s Existence, trans. D.O. Dalhstrom, C. Dyck, Springer, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York.

Mendelssohn M. (2011b), Writings on Judaism, Christianity, and the Bible, M. Gottlieb (ed.), trans. C. Bowman, E. Sacks, A. Arkush, Brandeis University Press, Waltham.

Mendelssohn M. (2012), To the Friends of Lessing, trans. Bruce Rosenstock, [in:] M. Mendelssohn, Last Works, University of Illinois Press, Urbana, Chicago, Springfield.

Munk R. (2006), “Mendelssohn and Kant on Judaism,” Jewish Studies Quarterly 13 (3): 215–222.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1628/094457006778994731

Oettli S. (1906), Das Urteil Kants über die alttestamentische Religion, Hans Adler, Greifswald.

Pines S. (1997), Spinoza’s Tractatus Theologico-Politicus, Maimonides and Kant, [in:] S. Pines, Studies in the History of Jewish Thought, W.Z. Harvey, M. Idel (eds.), The Magnes Press, Jerusalem: 660–712.

Poliakov L. (1981), Histoire de l’antisémitisme, tome 2, l’âge de la science, Calmann-Lévy, Paris.

Rose S.E. (2014), Off with Their Heads? Lazarus Bendavid’s Vision of Kantian Subjects at the End of Jewish History, [in:] S.E. Rose, Jewish Philosophical Politics in Germany 1789–1848, Brandeis University Press, Waltham: 14–44.

Rosenstock B. (2010), Philosophy and the Jewish Question. Mendelssohn, Rosenzweig, and Beyond, Fordham University Press, New York.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5422/fso/9780823231294.003.0001

Schmidt J. (2015), Niemieckie oświecenie, trans. A. Tomaszewska, [in:] Filozofia Oświecenia. Radykalizm, religia, kosmopolityzm, J. Miklaszewska, A. Tomaszewska (eds.), Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, Kraków: 65–95.

Schulte Ch. (2002), Die jüdische Aufklärung: Philosophie, Religion, Geschichte, C.H. Beck, München.

Sorkin D. (2012), Moses Mendelssohn and the Religious Enlightenment, Peter Halban, London.

Spinoza B. (1992), Ethics, trans. S. Shirley, [in:] B. Spinoza, Ethics, Treatise on the Emendation of the Intellect and Selected Letters, Hackett, Indianapolis, Cambridge: 31–223.

Spinoza B. (2007), Theological-Political Treatise, trans. J. Israel, M. Silverthorne, Cambridge University Press, New York.

Spinoza B. (2016), Theological-Political Treatise, trans. Edwin Curley, [in:] B. Spinoza, The Collected Works of Spinoza, Princeton University Press, Princeton, Oxford: 65–357.

Stangneth B. (2001), Antisemitische und Antijudaistische Motive bei Immanuel Kant? Tatsachen, Meinungen, Ursachen, [in:] Antisemitismus bei Kant und anderen Denkern der Aufklärung, H. Gronke, T. Meyer, B. Neisser (eds.), Königshausen & Neumann, Würzburg: 11–125.

Strauss L. (1988), How to Study Spinoza’s Theologico-Political Treatise, [in:] L. Strauss, Persecution and the Art of Writing, The University of Chicago Press, London, Chicago: 142–203.

Tomaszewska A. (2016a), “Kant’s Reconception of Religion and Contemporary Secularism,” Roczniki Filozoficzne 64 (4): 125–149.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18290/rf.2016.64.4-7

Tomaszewska A. (2016b), W stronę radykalnego Oświecenia: uwagi o religii według Spinozy i Kanta, [in:] Znaczenie filozofii Oświecenia, B. Grabowska, A. Grzeliński, J. Żelazna (eds.), Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika, Toruń: 167–187.

Tomaszewska A. (2020), “Filozofia religii Kanta w kontekście nowożytnego racjonalizmu religijnego,” Studia z Historii Filozofii 1 (11): 123–147.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12775/szhf.2020.007

Walther M. (2008), Konsistenz der Maximen: Universalisierbarkeit und Moralität nach Spinoza und Kant, [in:] Motivationen für das Selbst. Kant und Spinoza im Vergleich, A. Tillkorn (ed.), Harrassowitz, Wiesbaden: 109–132.

Wodziński M. (2003), Oświecenie żydowskie w Królestwie Polskim wobec chasydyzmu, Wydawnictwo Cyklady, Warszawa.

Zweig A. (1999), Introduction, [in:] I. Kant, Correspondence, trans. A. Zweig, Cambridge University Press, New York: 1–42.

Most read articles by the same author(s)