The Hare-Horgan-Timmons argument against descriptivism
Main Article Content
Abstract
In recent years, with the appearance of a new wave of realism and non-descriptivism, the old dispute in meta-ethics between cognitivism and non-cognitivism has resurfaced. At present one of the most intensely discussed arguments among meta-ethicists is the so-called Moral Twin Earth argument of Terrence Horgan and Mark Timmons. It was presented in a series of articles published at the beginning of the nineties. However, a similar argument was put forth much earlier by Richard Hare, though the participants of the discussion that has arisen in connection with the Moral Twin Earth have passed over it in silence. It appeared for the first time at the beginning of the fifties in The Language of Morals as the Missionary and the Cannibal Islands argument. Hare later renamed it the Reductio ad Absurdum of Descriptivism in an article published in 1986 under the same name. Since then he has made it as his basic instrument against descriptivism. In the present article the author (1) outlines the argument of Moral Twin Earth, (2) presents its prototype, and (3) offers a concise criticism of it.
Downloads
Article Details
By submitting his/her work to the Editorial Board, the author accepts, upon having his/her text recommended for publication, that Diametros applies the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license to the works we publish. Under this license, authors agree to make articles legally available for reuse, without permission or fees. Anyone may read, download, copy, print, distribute or reuse these articles without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as the author and original source are properly cited. The author holds the copyright without any other restrictions. Full information about CC-BY: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.
References
Blackburn [1984] – S. Blackburn, Spreading the Word, Oxford University Press, Oxford 1984.
View in Google Scholar
Brink [1989] – D. Brink, Moral Realism and the Foundations of Ethics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1989.
View in Google Scholar
Boyd [1988] – R. Boyd, How to Be a Moral Realist,w: Essays on Moral Realism, red. G. Sayre-McCord, Cornell University Press, Ithaca 1988.
View in Google Scholar
Copp [2000] – D. Copp, Milk, Honey, and the Good Life on Moral Twin Earth, „Synthese” (92) 2000.
View in Google Scholar
Geirsson [2003] – H. Geirsson, Moral Twin-Earth: The Intuitive Argument, „Southwest Philosophy Review” (19) 2003.
View in Google Scholar
Geirsson [2005] – H. Geirsson, Moral Twin-Earth and Moral Semantic Realism, oddane do druku w „Erkenntnis”. Pobrane dnia 10 stycznia 2005 z <http://www.public.iastate.edu/~geirsson/pdf/Moral%20TwinEarth%20and%20Moral%20Semantic%20Realism.pdf>.
View in Google Scholar
Gibbard [1990] – A. Gibbard, Wise Choices, Apt Feelings, Clarendon Press, Oxford 1990.
View in Google Scholar
Hare [1952] – R. M. Hare, The Language of Morals, Oxford University Press, London 1952.
View in Google Scholar
Hare [1986] – R. M. Hare, A „Reductio od Absurdum” of Descriptivism, w: Philosophy in Britain Today, red. S. Shanker, Croom Helm, London 1986. Cytuję za przedrukiem w: R. M. Hare, Essays in Ethical Theory, Clarendon Press, Oksford 1989.
View in Google Scholar
Hare [1987] – R. M. Hare, How to Decide Moral Question Rationally, „Critica” (18) 1987. Cytuję za przedrukiem w: R. M. Hare, Essays in Ethical Theory, Clarendon Press, Oxford 1989.
View in Google Scholar
Hare [1997] – R. M. Hare, Sorting Out Ethics, Clarendon Press, Oxford 1997.
View in Google Scholar
Hare [2001] – R. M. Hare, Myślenie moralne. Jego płaszczyzny, metody i istota, tłum. J. Margański, Fundacja Aletheia, Warszawa 2001.
View in Google Scholar
Horgan i Timmons [1991] – T. Horgan, M. Timmons, New Wave Moral Realism Meets Moral Twin Earth, „Journal of Philosophical Research” (16) 1991.
View in Google Scholar
Horgan i Timmons [1992a] – T. Horgan, M. Timmons, Troubles for new wave moral semantics: the „open-question argument” revived, „Philosophical Papers” (21) 1992.
View in Google Scholar
Horgan i Timmons [1992b] – T. Horgan, M. Timmons, Troubles on Moral Twin Earth: Moral Queerness Revived, „Synthese” (92) 1992.
View in Google Scholar
Horgan i Timmons [2000a] – T. Horgan, M. Timmons, Copping Out on Moral Twin Earth, „Synthese” (124) 2000.
View in Google Scholar
Horgan i Timmons [2000b] – T. Horgan, M. Timmons, Nondescriptivist Cognitivism: Framework for a New Metaethics, „Philosophical Papers” (29) 2000.
View in Google Scholar
Kripke [2001] – S. Kripke, Nazywanie i konieczność, tłum. B. Chwedeńczuk, Fundacja Aletheia, Warszawa 2001.
View in Google Scholar
Laurence, Margolis i Dawson [1999] – S. Laurence, E. Margolis, A. Dawson, Moral Realism and Twin Earth, „Facta Philosophica” (1) 1999.
View in Google Scholar
Mackie [1977] – J. L. Mackie, Ethics, Inventing Right and Wrong, Penguin Books, New York 1977.
View in Google Scholar
Putnam [1998] – H. Putnam, Znaczenie wyrazu „znaczenie”, w: H. Putnam, Wiele twarzy realizmu i inne eseje, tłum. A. Grobler, PWN, Warszawa 1998.
View in Google Scholar
Swoyer [2003] – Ch. Swoyer, Relativism, w: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2003 Edition), red. E. N. Zalta, pobrane 10 stycznia 2005 z: <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/ spr2003/entries/relativism/>.
View in Google Scholar
Timmons [1999] – M. Timmons, Morality Without Foundations. A Defense of Ethical Contextualism, Oxford University Press, New York 1999.
View in Google Scholar
Ziemińska [2002] – R. Ziemińska, Eksternalizm we współczesnej epistemologii, Rozprawy i Studia US, t. 407, Szczecin 2002.
View in Google Scholar