Reflective Equilibrium. Part III: The problem of moral disagreement, relativism and underdeterminacy of the method (in Polish)
Main Article Content
Abstract
Downloads
Article Details
By submitting his/her work to the Editorial Board, the author accepts, upon having his/her text recommended for publication, that Diametros applies the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license to the works we publish. Under this license, authors agree to make articles legally available for reuse, without permission or fees. Anyone may read, download, copy, print, distribute or reuse these articles without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as the author and original source are properly cited. The author holds the copyright without any other restrictions. Full information about CC-BY: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.
References
Bates [2004] – J. Bates, Reflective Equilibrium and Underdetermination in Epistemology, „Acta Analytica” (19) 2004, s. 45-64.
View in Google Scholar
Bonk [2008] – T. Bonk, Underdetermination. An Essay on Evidence and the Limits of Natural Knowledge, Springer, Dordreht 2008.
View in Google Scholar
Bonevac [2004] – D. Bonevac, Reflection without Equilibrium, „The Journal of Philosophy” (101) 2004, s. 363-388.
View in Google Scholar
Brambrough [2007] – R. Brambrough, Proof, [w:] Ethical Theory. An Anthology, R. Shafer-Landau (ed.), Balckwell 2007, s. 103-110.
View in Google Scholar
Daniels [1996] – N. Daniels, Justice and Justification, Reflective Equilibrium in Theory and Practice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1996.
View in Google Scholar
Daniels [2003] – N. Daniels, Reflective Equilibrium, [w:] Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu, first published 28 April 2003.
View in Google Scholar
DePaul [1987] – M. DePaul, Two Conceptions of Coherence Methods in Ethics, „Mind” (96) 1987, s. 463-481.
View in Google Scholar
Depaul [1988] – M. DePaul, Naivete and Corruption in Moral Inquiry, “Philosophy and Phenomenological Research” (48) 1988, s. 619-635.
View in Google Scholar
DePaul [1993] – M. DePaul, Balance and Refinement: Beyond Coherence Methods of Moral Inquiry, Routledge, Florence KY 1993.
View in Google Scholar
DePaul, Zagzebski [2003] – Intellectual Virtue. Perspectives from Ethics and Epistemology, M. DePaul, L. Trinkhaus-Zagzebski (eds), Clarendon Press, Oxford 2003.
View in Google Scholar
Fairweather, Zagzebski [2001] – Virtue Epistemology. Essays in Epistemic Virtue and Responsibility, A. Fairweather, L. Zagzebski (eds), Oxford University Press, Oxford 2001.
View in Google Scholar
Haslett [1987] – W. Haslett, What is Wrong with Reflective Equilibria?, „The Philosophical Quarterly” (37) 1987, s. 305-311.
View in Google Scholar
Huemer [2005] – M. Huemer, Ethical Intuitionism, Palgrave Macmillan, New York 2005.
View in Google Scholar
Humphreys [2005] – J. Humphreysa, The Story of Virtue. Universal Lessons on How to Live, The Liffey Press, Dublin 2005.
View in Google Scholar
Kąkol [2011] – T. Kąkol, Kilka uwag w sprawie kryterium genetycznego w sporze o (nie tylko) aborcję, „Etyka Praktyczna” (2) 2011, s. 78-84.
View in Google Scholar
Mackie [1977] – J. Mackie, Ethics. Inventing Right and Wrong, Penguin, New York 1977.
View in Google Scholar
Nielsen [1993] – K. Nielsen, Relativism and Wide Reflective Equilibrium, „Monist” (76) 1993, s. 316-332.
View in Google Scholar
Quine [1975] – W.V. Quine, On Empirically Equivalent Systems of the World, „Erkenntins” (9) 1975, s. 313-328.
View in Google Scholar
Rawls [2001a] – J. Rawls, The Outline of a Decision Procedure for Ethics, „The Philosophical Review” (60) 1951, s. 177-197, [przedrukowany w:] J. Rawls, Collected Papers, S. Freeman (ed.), Harvard University Press, Cambridge ,Mass. 2001, s. 1-19.
View in Google Scholar
Rawls [2001b] – J. Rawls, The Independence of Moral Theory, „The Philosophical Review” (60) 1951, s. 177-197 [przedrukowany w:] J. Rawls, Collected Papers, S. Freeman (ed.), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass. 2001, s. 286-302.
View in Google Scholar
Rutkowski [2011] – M. Rutkowski, O kryterium genetycznym w sporze o aborcję raz jeszcze. Odpowiedź na zarzuty, „Etyka Praktyczna” (2) 2011, s. 85-91.
View in Google Scholar
Scanlon [2003] – T. Scanlon, Rawls on Justification, [w:] Cambridge Companion to Rawls, S. Freeman (ed.), Cambridge University Press, New York 2003, s. 139-167.
View in Google Scholar
Shafer-Landau [2003] – R. Shafer-Landau, Moral Realism. A Defence, Clarendon Press, Oxford 2003.
View in Google Scholar
Szutta [2007] – N. Szutta, Współczesna etyka cnót, Wyd. Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego, Gdańsk 2007.
View in Google Scholar
Szutta [2013a] – A. Szutta, Metoda refleksyjnej równowagi. Część I: prezentacja metody, „Diametros” (35) 2013, 129-149.
View in Google Scholar
Szutta [2013b] – A. Szutta, Metoda refleksyjnej równowagi. Część II: Zarzut błędnego koła i problem wiarygodności rozważnych sądów moralnych, „Diametros” (36) 2013, s. 122-146.
View in Google Scholar
Tersman [2006] – F. Tersman, Moral Disagreement, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2006.
View in Google Scholar
Zagzebski [1996] – L. Trinkaus-Zagzebski, Virtues of the Mind. An Inquiry into the Nature of Virtue and the Ethical Foundations of Knowledge, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1996.
View in Google Scholar