Reflective equilibrium. Part one: Explaining the method (in Polish)

Article Sidebar

PDF (Język Polski) PDF (In Polish) Full text (Język Polski)
Published: Mar 1, 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13153/diam.35.2013.513
Keywords:
reflective equilibrium considered moral judgements John Rawls

Main Article Content

Artur Szutta
University of Gdańsk

Abstract

The article concerns the method of reflective equilibrium which, according to its advocates, allows for correcting and justifying our ethical views. Generally speaking, it consists in the identification of our considered moral judgements, the formulation of moral principles that explicate these judgements, and the elimination of conflicts between them and any relevant background theories. The result of this process of adjustment is an equilibrium in which these elements support and justify each other. Despite a number of advocates (J. Rawls, N. Daniels, R. Dworkin), the method has been heavily criticized (for example by R. M. Hare, P. Singer, or R. B. Brandt), the objections being that it is an example of a vicious circle or that it justifies ethical relativism. This article opens a series of three papers which aim to defend the method. The first step to realize this goal is to present and explain the method itself.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Szutta, Artur. 2013. “Reflective Equilibrium. Part One: Explaining the Method (in Polish)”. Diametros, no. 35 (March):129-49. https://doi.org/10.13153/diam.35.2013.513.
Issue
No. 35 (2013)
Section
Articles

By submitting his/her work to the Editorial Board, the author accepts, upon having his/her text recommended for publication, that Diametros applies the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) license to works we publish. Under this license, authors agree to make articles legally available for reuse, without permission or fees, for any purpose except commercial. Anyone may read, download, copy, print, distribute or reuse these articles without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as the author and original source are properly cited. The author holds the copyright without any other restrictions. Full information about CC-BY-NC:  https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode.

Creative Commons License

Author Biography

Artur Szutta, University of Gdańsk

Artur Szutta, PhD University of Gdańsk Institute of Philosophy, Sociology, and Journalism ul. Bażyńskiego 4 Pl-80-952 Gdańsk e-mail: aszutta102@gmail.com
Share |
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

Audi [2007] – Robert Audi, Intuitionism, Pluralism, and the Foundations of Ethics, [w:] Foundations of Ethics. An Anthology, R. Shafer-Landau (ed.), Balckwell 2007, s. 402-419.
View in Google Scholar

Brandt [1979] – R.B. Brandt, A Theory of the Good and the Right, Oxford University Press, Oxford 1979.
View in Google Scholar

Brandt [1990] – R.B. Brandt, The Science of Man and Wide Reflective Equilibrium, “Ethics” (100) 1990, s. 259-278.
View in Google Scholar

Brink [1989] – D.O. Brink, Moral Realism and the Foundations of Ethics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1989.
View in Google Scholar

Daniels [1996] – N. Daniels, Justice and Justification, Reflective Equilibrium in Theory and Practice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1996.
View in Google Scholar

DePaul [1987] – M. DePaul, Two Conceptions of Coherence Methods in Ethics, “Mind” (96) 1987, s. 463-481.
View in Google Scholar

DePaul [1993] – M. DePaul, Balance and Refinement: Beyond Coherence Methods of Moral Inquiry, Routledge, Florence KY 1993.
View in Google Scholar

DePaul [1998] – M. DePaul, Why Bother with Reflective Equilibrium?, [w:] Rethinking Intuition, M. DePaul, W. Ramsey (eds), Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc., 1998.
View in Google Scholar

DePaul [2006] – M.R. DePaul, Intuitions in Moral Inquiry, [w:] Ethical Theory, David Copp (ed.), Oxford University Press, Oxford 2006, s. 596-623.
View in Google Scholar

Dworkin [1989] – R. Dworkin, The Original Position, [w:] Reading Rawls. Critical Studies on Rawls’ ‘A Theory of Justice’, N. Daniels (ed.), Basic Books, New York 1989, s. 124-140.
View in Google Scholar

Freeman [2007] – S. Freeman, Rawls, Routledge, London 2007.
View in Google Scholar

Goodman [1955] – N. Goodman, Fact, Fiction, and Forcast, Harvard University Press, Cambridge 1955.
View in Google Scholar

Halsett [1987] – W. Halsett, What is Wrong with Reflective Equilibria?, “The Philosophical Quarterly” (37) 1987, s. 305-311.
View in Google Scholar

Hare [1989] – R.M. Hare, Rawls’s Theory of Justice, [w:] Reading Rawls, Critical Studies on Rawls’ ‘A Theory of Justice’, N. Daniels (ed.), Basic Books, New York 1989, s. 81-107.
View in Google Scholar

Huemer [2005] – M. Huemer, Ethical Intuitionism, Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.
View in Google Scholar

Philips [1994] – M. Philips, Between Universalism and Skepticism: Ethics As Social Artifact, Oxford University Press, Cary, NC 1994.
View in Google Scholar

Rawls [1993] – J. Rawls, Teoria sprawiedliwości, tłum. M. Panufnik, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa 1993.
View in Google Scholar

Rawls [1998] – J. Rawls, Liberalizm polityczny, tłum. A. Romaniuk, PWN, Warszawa 1998.
View in Google Scholar

Rawls [1999] – J. Rawls, A Theory of Justice. Revised Edition, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass. 1999.
View in Google Scholar

Rawls [2001a] – J. Rawls, The Outline of a Decision Procedure for Ethics, “The Philosophical Review” (60) 1951, s. 177-197; [przedrukowany w:] J. Rawls, Collected Papers, S. Freeman (ed.), Harvard University Press, Cambridge Mass. 2001, s. 1-19.
View in Google Scholar

Rawls [2001b] – J. Rawls, The Independence of Moral Theory, “The Philosophical Review” (60) 1951, s. 177-197; [przedrukowany w:] J. Rawls, Collected Papers, S. Freeman (ed.), Harvard University Press, Cambridge Mass. 2001, s. 286-302.
View in Google Scholar

Scanlon [2003] – T.M. Scanlon, Rawls on Justification, [w:] The Cambridge Companion to Rawls, S. Freeman (ed.), Cambridge University Press, New York 2003, s. 139-167.
View in Google Scholar

Singer [1974] – P. Singer, Sidgwick and Reflective Equilibrium, “Monist” (58) 1974.
View in Google Scholar

Singer [2005] – P. Singer, Ethics and Intuition, “The Journal of Ethics” (9) 2005, s. 331-352.
View in Google Scholar

Szutta [2010] – A. Szutta, Cnota rozsądności, [w:] Współczesna etyka cnót: możliwości i ograniczenia, red. Natasza Szutta, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Semper, Warszawa 2010, s. 195-204.
View in Google Scholar

Szubka [2009] – T. Szubka, Filozofia analityczna. Koncepcje, metody, ograniczenia, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego, Wrocław 2009.
View in Google Scholar