A contribution to the problem of the causality of omissions

Main Article Content

Mateusz Klinowski

Abstract

The text deals with the causal status of omissions. This problem is one of the arguments against treating omissions as full acts. I first discuss several arguments that are frequently cited in the literature against the recognition of the causal nature of omissions, showing that each of them is inconclusive. Then I a present a logical analysis known as the "sees to it" theory, which correctly captures a series of intuitions concerning activity, duty, and the ability to do something. With the help of this analysis I construct an interesting argument in favor of the causality of omissions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Klinowski, Mateusz. 2009. “A Contribution to the Problem of the Causality of Omissions”. Diametros, no. 21 (September):63-77. https://doi.org/10.13153/diam.21.2009.354.
Section
Articles
Author Biography

Mateusz Klinowski

dr Mateusz Klinowski Katedra Teorii i Filozofii Prawa Wydział Prawa i Administracji UJ
Share |

References

Belnap et al. [2001] – N. Belnap, M. Perloft , M. Xu, Facing the future, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2001.
View in Google Scholar

Buchała, Zoll [1997] – K. Buchała, A. Zoll, Polskie prawo karne, Wydawnictwa Prawnicze PWN, Warszawa 1997.
View in Google Scholar

Dennett [1993] – D. C. Dennett, Consciousness Explained, Penguin Books, London 1993.
View in Google Scholar

Hart [1963] – H.L.A. Hart, The Ascription of Responsibility and Rights, w: A. Flew (red.), Logic and Language, Basil Blackwell, Oxford 1963, s. 145-166.
View in Google Scholar

Hart, Honoré [1985] – H.L.A. Hart, T. Honoré, Causation in the Law, 2nd ed., Clarendon, Oxford 1985.
View in Google Scholar

Horty, Belnap [1995] – J.F. Horty, N. Belnap, The Deliberative Stit: A Study of Action, Omission, Ability, and Obligation, „Journal of Philosophical Logic”, 24 (1995), s. 583-644.
View in Google Scholar

Horty [2001] – J.F. Horty, Agency and deontic logic, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
View in Google Scholar

Mącior [1990] – W. Mącior, Czyn ludzki i jego znaczenie w prawie karnym, Wydawnictwo Prawnicze, Warszawa 1990.
View in Google Scholar

Patryas [1988] – W. Patryas, Interpretacja karnistyczna, Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM, Poznań 1998.
View in Google Scholar

Patryas [1992] – W. Patryas, Przyczynek do zagadnienia przyczynowości zaniechania, „Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny”, 1992, zeszyt 3, s. 1-9.
View in Google Scholar

Patryas [1993] – W. Patryas, Zaniechanie, Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM, Poznań 1993.
View in Google Scholar

Searle [1995] – J.R. Searle, Umysł, mózg i nauka, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa 1995.
View in Google Scholar

Searle [1996] – J.R. Searle, The construction of Social Reality, Penguin Books, London 1996.
View in Google Scholar

Wright [1963] – G.H. von Wright, Norm and Action – a Logical Enquiry, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London 1963.
View in Google Scholar

Wright [1968] – G.H. von Wright, An Essay in Deontic Logic and the General Theory of Action, North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam 1968.
View in Google Scholar

Ziembiński [1972] – Z. Ziembiński, Analiza pojęcia czynu, Wiedza Powszechna, Warszawa 1972.
View in Google Scholar