Accession, Property Acquisition, and Libertarianism
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
In the present paper we argue that besides four traditional methods of property acquisition – that is, homesteading, production, voluntary transfer and rectification of injustice – libertarianism also recognizes a fifth method, namely the method of accession. We contend that not only have some libertarian scholars implicitly embraced the accession principle, but also that if libertarianism wants to distribute exclusive ownership to indivisible things produced from inputs supplied by two or more parties without running into conflict with its own principles of justice, it has to recognize accession as the fifth mode of appropriation. As the main thesis of the paper goes against the received view concerning the very core of libertarianism, that is, its methods of property acquisition, the text indicates some new developments within the libertarian theory of justice.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
By submitting his/her work to the Editorial Board, the author accepts, upon having his/her text recommended for publication, that Diametros applies the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license to the works we publish. Under this license, authors agree to make articles legally available for reuse, without permission or fees. Anyone may read, download, copy, print, distribute or reuse these articles without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as the author and original source are properly cited. The author holds the copyright without any other restrictions. Full information about CC-BY: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.
References
Barnett R.E. (1998), The Structure of Liberty, Oxford University Press, New York.
Blackstone W. (2016), Commentaries on the Laws of England, Book II: Of the Rights of Things, S. Stern (ed.), Oxford University Press, New York.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780199601004.book.1
Block W.E. (2004), “Libertarianism, Positive Obligations and Property Abandonment: Children’s Rights,” International Journal of Social Economics 31 (3): 275–286.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/03068290410518256
Block W.E. (2008), “Homesteading, Ad Coelum, Owning Views and Forestalling,” The Social Sciences 3 (2): 96-103.
Block W.E. (2010), “Van Dun on Freedom and Property: A Critique,” Libertarian Papers, 2 (Art. 4): 1–11.
Block W.E. (2016), “Forestalling, Positive Obligations and the Lockean and Blockian Provisos: Rejoinder to Stephan Kinsella,” Ekonomia – Wroclaw Economic Review 22 (3): 27-41.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.19195/2084-4093.22.3.2
Block W.E. (2019), “Libertarian Punishment Theory and Unjust Enrichment,” Journal of Business Ethics 154: 103-108.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3469-7
Block W.E. (2021), “Rejoinder to Dominiak on the Necessity of Easements,” Ekonomia – Wroclaw Economic Review 27 (1): 9-25.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.19195/2658-1310.27.1.1
Block W.E. (2022), “Rejoinder to Dominiak on Bagels and Donuts,” Ekonomia – Wroclaw Economic Review 28 (1): 97-109.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.19195/2658-1310.28.1.6
Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch (German Civil Code), URL = https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_bgb/index.html [Accessed 30.11.2022].
Calabresi G., Melamed D.A. (1972), “Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Inalienability: One View of the Cathedral,” Harvard Law Review 85 (6): 1089-1128.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1340059
Christmas B. (2021), Property and Justice: A Liberal Theory of Natural Rights, Routledge, New York.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429297250
The Digest of Justinian (1985), A. Watson, Th. Mommsen, P. Kruger (eds.), University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.
Dominiak Ł. (2017a), “Libertarianism and Original Appropriation,” Historia i Polityka 22 (29): 43-56.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12775/HiP.2017.026
Dominiak Ł. (2017b), “The Blockian Proviso and the Rationality of Property Rights,” Libertarian Papers 9 (1): 114-128.
Dominiak Ł. (2019), “Must Right-Libertarians Embrace Easements by Necessity?,” Diametros: An Online Journal of Philosophy 16 (60): 34-51.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33392/diam.1241
Dominiak Ł. (2021), “Libertarian Easements Revisited,” Ekonomia – Wroclaw Economic Review 27 (1): 27-35.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.19195/2658-1310.27.1.2
Dominiak Ł. (2022), “Unjust Enrichment and Libertarianism,” Polish Political Science Review 10 (2): 1-13.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ppsr-2022-0009
Dominiak Ł. (2023a), “Proceeds of Crime, Punishment, and Libertarianism,” Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej 2 (35): 20-33.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36280//AFPiFS.2023.2.20
Dominiak Ł. (2023b), “Is the Rothbardian Theory of Punishment Retributive?,” Roczniki Filozoficzne 71 (3): 7-25.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18290/rf23713.1
Dominiak Ł. (2023c), “Mixing Labor, Taking Possession, and Libertarianism,” Studia z Historii Filozofii, 14(3): 169-195.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12775/szhf.2023.026
Dominiak Ł., Wysocki I. (2023), “Libertarianism, Defense of Property, and Absolute Rights,” Analiza i Egzystencja 61 (1): 5-26.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18276/aie.2023.61-01
Epstein R.A. (1973), “A Theory of Strict Liability,” Journal of Legal Studies 2: 151-204.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/467495
Epstein R.A. (1979), “Possession as the Root of Title,” Georgia Law Review 13: 1221-1243.
Epstein R.A. (1997), “A Clear View of the Cathedral: The Dominance of Property Rules,” Yale Law Journal 106 (7): 2091-2120.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/797162
Feinberg J. (1984), Harm to Others, Oxford University Press, New York.
Hohfeld W.N. (1913), “Some Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning,” Yale Law Journal 23 (1): 16-59.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/785533
Hohfeld W.N. (1917), “Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning,” Yale Law Journal 26 (8): 710-770.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/786270
Hoppe H.-H. (2001), Democracy – The God That Failed. The Economics and Politics of Monarchy, Democracy, and Natural Order, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, London.
Hoppe H.-H. (2004), “Property, Causality, and Liability,” Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 7 (4): 87-95.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12113-004-1005-y
Hoppe H.-H. (2010), A Theory of Socialism and Capitalism, Ludwig von Mises Institute, Auburn, Ala.
Hoppe H.-H. (2012), “The Ethics and Economics of Private Property,” [in:] H.-H. Hoppe, The Great Fiction: Property, Economy, Society, and the Politics of Decline, Laissez Faire Books, Baltimore: 9-25.
Hoppe H.-H. (2014), From Aristocracy to Monarchy to Democracy, Ludwig von Mises Institute, Auburn, Ala.
The Institutes of Gaius, Part I: Text with Critical Notes and Translation (1958), F. de Zulueta (ed.), Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Kinsella S.N. (2008), Against Intellectual Property, Ludwig von Mises Institute, Auburn, Ala.
Kramer M.H. (1998), “Rights without Trimmings,” [in:] A Debate Over Rights, M.H. Kramer, N.E. Simmonds, H. Steiner (eds.), Oxford University Press, New York: 7-111.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198298991.003.0002
Lorenzen E.G. (1925), “Specification in the Civil Law,” Yale Law Journal 35 (1): 29-47.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/789534
Mack E. (2010), “The Natural Rights of Property,” Social Philosophy and Policy 27 (1): 53-78.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052509990033
Merrill Th.W. (2009), “Accession and Original Ownership,” Journal of Legal Analysis 1 (2): 459-510.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jla/1.2.459
Narveson J. (1999), “Property Rights: Original Acquisition and Lockean Provisos,” Public Affairs Quarterly 13 (3): 205-227.
Nozick R. (1974), Anarchy, State, and Utopia, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.
Rothbard M.N. (1998), The Ethics of Liberty, New York University Press, New York.
Rothbard M.N. (2009), Man, Economy, and State, Ludwig von Mises Institute, Auburn, Ala.
Rothbard M.N. (2011), “Justice and Property Rights,” [in:] M.N. Rothbard, Economic Controversies, Ludwig von Mises Institute, Auburn, Ala: 347-366.
Silsbury v. McCoon, 3 N.Y. 379 (N.Y. 1850).
Slenzok N. (2020), A priori wolności, a priori porządku. Filozofia społeczno-polityczna Hansa-Hermanna Hoppego a spory o podstawy libertarianizmu, doctoral thesis, Katowice.
Sokolowski P. von (1902), Die Philosophie im Privatrecht, Max Niemeyer, Halle.
Stein P. (1972), “The Two Schools of Jurists in the Early Roman Principate,” Cambridge Law Journal 31 (1): 8-31.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197300133951
Steiner H. (1977), “The Structure of a Set of Compossible Rights,” Journal of Philosophy 74 (12): 767-775.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2025928
Steiner H. (1994), An Essay on Rights, Blackwell Publishers, Oxford.
Steiner H. (1998), “Working Rights,” [in:] A Debate over Rights, M.H. Kramer, N.E. Simmonds, H. Steiner (eds.), Oxford University Press, New York: 233-301.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198298991.003.0004
Steiner H. (2019), “Asymmetric Information, Libertarianism, and Fraud,” Review of Social Economy 77 (2): 94-107.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00346764.2019.1602280
Stilz A. (2018), “Property Rights: Natural or Conventional?,” [in:] The Routledge Handbook of Libertarianism, J. Brennan, B. van der Vossen, D. Schmidtz (eds.), Routledge, New York: 244-258.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781317486794-18
Vallentyne P. (2000), “Introduction: Left-Libertarianism – A Primer,” [in:] Left-Libertarianism and Its Critics: The Contemporary Debate, P. Vallentyne, H. Steiner (eds.), Palgrave, New York: 1-20.
Van Warmelo P. (1957), “Aspects of Joint Ownership in Roman Law,” Legal History Review 25 (2): 125-195.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/157181944X00019
Wendt F. (2018), “The Sufficiency Proviso,” [in:] The Routledge Handbook of Libertarianism, J. Brennan, B. van der Vossen, D. Schmidtz (eds.), Routledge, New York: 169-183.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781317486794-13
Wendt F. (2022), “The Project Pursuit Argument for Self-Ownership and Private Property,” Social Theory and Practice 48 (3): 583-605.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/soctheorpract2022531165
Wetherbee v. Green, 22 Mich. 311 (Mich. 1871).
Wood Th. (1721), A New Institute of the Imperial or Civil Law. With Notes Shewing in some Principal Cases amongst other Observations, How the Canon Law, the Laws of England, and the Laws and Customs of other Nations differ from it, Richard Sare, London.
Wójtowicz S. (2021), “Libertariańska teoria kary i samoobrony,” Dialogi Polityczne 30 (1): 165-186.
Zhang Q. (2020), “Note. Accession on the Frontiers of Property,” Harvard Law Review 133: 2381-2402.