Nicolai Hartmann and José Ortega y Gasset: An overview of an intellectual relationship based on the correspondence of two philosophers from 1907–1912
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article is of both a historical and philosophical nature. It aims to present the intellectual relationship between the Spanish philosopher José Ortega y Gasset and one of the most influential German thinkers of the first half of the twentieth century, Nicolai Hartmann. It is based on hitherto unknown and unpublished correspondence that the philosophers conducted intermittently between 1907 and 1912. The correspondence was found in the archives of the José Ortega y Gasset – Gregorio Marañón Foundation in Madrid along with other letters that show the relationship between the Spanish author and representatives of the neo-Kantian Marburg School, including its founder Hermann Cohen, as well as Paul Natorp, Ernst Cassirer, and Heinz Heimsoeth.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
By submitting his/her work to the Editorial Board, the author accepts, upon having his/her text recommended for publication, that Diametros applies the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license to the works we publish. Under this license, authors agree to make articles legally available for reuse, without permission or fees. Anyone may read, download, copy, print, distribute or reuse these articles without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as the author and original source are properly cited. The author holds the copyright without any other restrictions. Full information about CC-BY: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.
How to Cite
References
Cassirer E. (1934–1936), Letters to J. Ortega y Gasset, Archivo Fundación José Ortega y Gasset-Gregorio Marañon: C-57/26a, C-57/26b, C-57/26c, C-57/26ch.
Cerezo Galán P. (1984), La voluntad de aventura. Aproximamiento crítico al pensamiento de Ortega y Gasset, Ariel, Barcelona.
Cohen H. (1866), “Die platonische Ideenlehre, psychologisch entwickelt,” Zeitschrift für Völkerpsychologie und Sprachwissenschaft 4: 403–464.
Cohen H. (1907–1910), Letters to J. Ortega y Gasset, Archivo Fundación José Ortega y Gasset-Gregorio Marañon: C-58/1a; C-58/1b and C-58/1c.
Cohen H. (1918), Kants Theorie der Erfahrung, Cassirer, Berlin.
Correspondencia. José Ortega y Gasset, Helene Weyl (2008), G. Märtens (ed.), Biblioteca Nueva, Madrid.
Galewicz W. (1987), N. Hartmann, Wiedza Powszechna, Warszawa.
Hartmann N. (1907–1921), Letters to J. Ortega y Gasset, Archivo Fundación José Ortega y Gasset-Gregorio Marañon: C-17/1; C-17/2; C-17/3; C-17/4; C-17/5; C-17/6; C-17/7; C-17/8; C-17/9; C-17/10; C-17/11; C-17/12; C-17/13.
Hartmann N. (1912), Philosophische Grundfragen der Biologie, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen.
Hartmann N. (1921), Grundzüge einer Metaphysik der Erkenntnis, W. de Gruyter, Berlin.
Hartmann N. (1912), “Systematische Methode,” Logos 3: 121–163.
Holzhey H. (2010), “Neo-Kantianism and phenomenology: The problem of in-tuition,” [in:] Neo-Kantianism in Contemporary Philosophy, R.A. Makkreel and S. Luft (eds.), Indiana University Press, Bloomington and Indianapolis: 25–40.
Leszczyna D. (2012), José Ortega y Gassset. Studia na niemieckich uniwersytetach, Aureus, Cracow.
Leszczyna D. (2019), “Ortega y sus condiscípulos de la escuela de Marburgo. La correspondencia con Nicolai Hartmann,” Revista de Estudios Orteguianos 38: 121–145.
Łaciak P. (2004), “Miejsce i funkcja poznania istotnościowego (poznania a priori) w transcendentalnej fenomenologii Edmunda Husserla,” Archiwum historii filozofii i myśli społecznej 49: 191–192.
Morón Arroyo C. (1968), El sistema de Ortega y Gasset, Alcalá, Madrid.
Natorp P. (1907–1912), Letters to J. Ortega y Gasset, Archivo Fundación José Ortega y Gasset-Gregorio Marañon: C-68/2a, C-68/2b, C-68/2c.
Natorp P. (1912), “Kant und die Marburger Schule,” Kant-Studien 17: 193–221.
Noras A.J. (2015), “Początki filozofii Cohena a problem psychologii,” Kultura i wartości 13: 153–170.
Noras A.J. (2017), “Filozofia a psychologia. Próba charakterystyki problemu,” IDEA – Studia nad strukturą i rozwojem pojęć filozoficznych XXIX (1): 5–23.
Noras A.J. (2017), Problem psychologii w filozofii pokantowskiej, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego w Katowicach, Katowice.
Orringer N.R. (1979), Ortega y sus fuentes germánicas, Gredos, Madrid.
Orringer N.R. (1984), “Kant, Ortega y la posesión de una filosofía,” Logos. Anales del Seminario de Metafísica 26 (Extra 1): 109–125.
Orringer N.R. (1984), “Ser y no-ser en Platón: Hartmann y Ortega,” Nueva Revista de Filología Hispánica 28 (1): 60–86.
Orringer N.R. (1984), Nuevas fuentes germánicas de ‘¿Qué es fi losofi a?’ de Ortega, CSIC, Instituto Luis Vives, Madrid.
Ortega y Gasset J. (1935–1949), Letters to H. Heimsoeth, Archivo Fundación José Ortega y Gasset-Gregorio Marañon: CD-H/23 (1); CD-H/23a and CD-H/24.
Ortega y Gasset J. (2004–2010), Obras Completas, Taurus, Madrid.
Peucker H. (2002), Von der Psychologie zur Phänomenologie. Husserls Weg in die Phänomenologie der ‘Logischen Untersuchungen’, Felix Meiner Verlag, Hamburg.
San Martín J. (2012), La fenomenología de Ortega y Gasset, Biblioteca Nueva, Madrid.
Schmidt W. (1976), Psychologie und Transzendentalphilosophie. Zur Psychologie Rezeption bei Hermann Cohen und Paul Natorp, Bouvier, Bonn.
Vélez León P (2016), “Un perfil intelectual de Nicolai Hartmann (1882–1950). Parte I,” Disputatio. Philosophical Research Bulletin 5 (6): 457–538.