Misunderstanding Metaethics: Difficulties Measuring Folk Objectivism and Relativism

Main Article Content

Lance S. Bush
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1758-6699
David Moss
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0795-8687

Abstract

Recent research on the metaethical beliefs of ordinary people appears to show that they are metaethical pluralists that adopt different metaethical standards for different moral judgments. Yet the methods used to evaluate folk metaethical belief rely on the assumption that participants interpret what they are asked in metaethical terms. We argue that most participants do not interpret questions designed to elicit metaethical beliefs in metaethical terms, or at least not in the way researchers intend. As a result, existing methods are not reliable measures of metaethical belief. We end by discussing the implications of our account for the philosophical and practical implications of research on the psychology of metaethics. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Bush, Lance S., and David Moss. 2020. “Misunderstanding Metaethics: Difficulties Measuring Folk Objectivism and Relativism”. Diametros 17 (64):6-21. https://doi.org/10.33392/diam.1495.
Section
Articles
Share |

References

Andow J. (2016), “Qualitative Tools and Experimental Philosophy,” Philosophical Psychology, 29 (8): 1128–1141.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2016.1224826

Ayars A., Nichols S., (2019), “Rational Learners and Metaethics: Universalism, Relativism, and Evidence from Consensus,” Mind & Language 35 (1): 67–89.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12232

Beebe J.R., Sackris D. (2016), “Moral Objectivism Across the Lifespan,” Philosophical Psychology 29 (6): 912–929.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2016.1174843

Beebe J.R. (2015), “The Empirical Study of Folk Metaethics,” Etyka 50: 11–28.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14394/etyka.486

Beebe J.R., Qiaoan R., Wysocki T. et al. (2015), “Moral Objectivism in Cross-Cultural Perspective,” Journal of Cognition and Culture 15 (3–4): 386–401.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15685373-12342157

Björnsson G. (2017), “Contextualism in Ethics”, [in:] International Encyclopedia of Ethics, H. LaFollette (ed.), published online: 21 June 2017, doi: 10.1002/9781444367072.wbiee760.pub2.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444367072.wbiee760.pub2

Camerer C., Loewenstein G., Weber M. (1989), “The Curse of Knowledge in Economic Settings: An Experimental Analysis,” Journal of Political Economy 97 (5): 1232–1254.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/261651

Colebrook R. (under review), “Reconceptualizing Folk Metaethics,” URL = https://www.academia.edu/36014543/The_Irrationality_of_Folk_Metaethics [Accessed 8.5.2020].
View in Google Scholar

Collier-Spruel L., Hawkins A., Jayawickreme E. et al. (2019), “Relativism or Tolerance? Defining, Assessing, Connecting, and Distinguishing Two Moral Personality Features with Prominent Roles in Modern Societies,” Journal of Personality 87 (6): 1170–1188.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12466

Collins D. (2003), “Pretesting Survey Instruments: An Overview of Cognitive Methods,” Quality of Life Research 12 (3): 229–238.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023254226592

Cova F., Strickland B., Abatista A. et al. (2018), “Estimating the Reproducibility of Experimental Philosophy,” Review of Philosophy and Psychology, published online: 14 June 2018, doi: 10.1007/s13164-018-0400-9.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-018-0400-9

Feltz A., Cokely E.T. (2008), “The Fragmented Folk: More Evidence of Stable Individual Differences in Moral Judgments and Folk Intuitions,” [in:] Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, B.C. Love, K. McRae, V.M. Sloutsky (eds), TX: Cognitive Science Society, Austin: 1771–1776.
View in Google Scholar

Fisher M., Knobe J., Strickland B. et al. (2017), “The Influence of Social Interaction on Intuitions of Objectivity and Subjectivity,” Cognitive Science 41 (4): 1119–1134.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12380

Forsyth D.R. (1980), “A Taxonomy of Ethical Ideologies,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39 (1): 175–184.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.39.1.175

Gert J. (2013), “Color Constancy and Dispositionalism,” Philosophical Studies 162 (2): 183–200.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-011-9754-x

Goodwin G.P., Darley J.M. (2010), “The Perceived Objectivity of Ethical Beliefs: Psychological Findings and Implications for Public Policy,” Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1 (2): 161–188.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-009-0013-4

Goodwin G.P., Darley J.M. (2008), “The Psychology of Meta-Ethics: Exploring Objectivism,” Cognition 106 (3): 1339–1366.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.06.007

Goodwin G.P., Darley J.M. (2012), “Why are Some Moral Beliefs Perceived to be More Objective than Others?,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 48 (1): 250–256.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.08.006

Heiphetz L., Young L.L. (2017), “Can Only One Person Be Right? The Development of Objectivism and Social Preferences Regarding Widely Shared and Controversial Moral Beliefs,” Cognition 167: 78–90.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.05.014

Joyce R. (2015a), “Moral Objectivity and Moral Relativism,” [in:] Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2016 Edition), E.N. Zalta (ed.), URL = https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-anti-realism/moral-objectivity-relativism.html [Accessed 2.10.2019].
View in Google Scholar

Joyce R. (2015b), “Moral Anti-Realism,” [in:] Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2016 Edition), E.N. Zalta (ed.), URL = https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-anti-realism/ [Accessed 2.10.2019].
View in Google Scholar

Gowans C. (2015), “Moral Relativism,” [in:] Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2019 Edition), E.N. Zalta (ed.), URL = https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-relativism/ [Accessed 5.10.2019].
View in Google Scholar

McHugh M.L. (2012), “Interrater Reliability: The Kappa Statistic,” Biochemia Medica 22 (3): 276–282.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2012.031

Moss D. (2017), “Experimental Philosophy, Folk Metaethics and Qualitative Methods,” Teorema 36 (3): 185–203.
View in Google Scholar

Nichols S. (2004), “After Objectivity: An Empirical Study of Moral Judgment,” Philosophical Psychology 17 (1): 3–26.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0951508042000202354

Pölzler T. (2018), “How to Measure Moral Realism,” Review of Philosophy and Psychology 9 (3): 647–670.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-018-0401-8

Pölzler T., Wright J.C. (2020), “Anti-Realist Pluralism: A New Approach to Folk Metaethics,” Review of Philosophy and Psychology 11 (1): 53–82.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-019-00447-8

Pölzler T., Wright J.C. (2019), “Empirical Research on Folk Moral Objectivism,” Philosophy Compass 14 (5): e12589.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12589

Rai T.S., Holyoak K.J. (2013), “Exposure to Moral Relativism Compromises Moral Behavior,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 49 (6): 995–1001.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.06.008

Rose D., Nichols S. (2019), “From Punishment to Universalism,” Mind & Language 34 (1): 59–72.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12191

Rysiew P. (2011), “Relativism and Contextualism,” [in:] A Companion to Relativism, S.D. Hales (ed.), Blackwell Publishing, West Sussex (UK): 286–305.
View in Google Scholar

Sarkissian H., Park J., Tien D. et al. (2011), “Folk Moral Relativism,” Mind & Language 26 (4): 482–505.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2011.01428.x

Sarkissian H., Phelan M. (2019), “Moral Objectivism and a Punishing God,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 80: 1–7.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.08.012

Wainryb C., Shaw L.A., Langley M. et al. (2004), “Children’s Thinking about Diversity of Belief in the Early School Years: Judgments of Relativism, Tolerance, and Disagreeing Persons,” Child Development 75 (3): 687–703.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00701.x

Wright J.C. (2018), “The Fact and Function of Meta-Ethical Pluralism: Examining the Evidence,” [in:] Oxford Studies in Experimental Philosophy (vol. 2), T. Lombrozo, S. Nichols, J. Knobe (eds), Oxford University Press, Oxford: 119–150.
View in Google Scholar

Wright J.C., Grandjean P.T., McWhite C.B. (2013), “The Meta-Ethical Grounding of Our Moral Beliefs: Evidence for Meta-Ethical Pluralism,” Philosophical Psychology 26 (3): 336–361.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2011.633751

Yilmaz O., Bahçekapili H.G. (2015), “Without God, Everything is Permitted? The Reciprocal Infl uence of Religious and Meta-Ethical Beliefs,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 58: 95–100.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.01.003

Yilmaz O., Bahçekapili H.G. (2018), “Meta-Ethics and the Mortality: Mortality Salience Leads People to Adopt a Less Subjectivist Morality,” Cognition 179: 171–177.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.014

Young L., Durwin A.J. (2013), “Moral Realism as Moral Motivation: The Impact of Meta-Ethics on Everyday Decision-Making,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 49 (2): 302–306.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.11.013