The Role of Parental Consent in the Medical Care of Extremely Preterm Babies

Main Article Content

Paweł Łuków
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6873-6853

Abstract

The paper analyses the application of the best interest standard in the medical care of extremely preterm babies. It proposes that as long as the parents base their decision on a well-founded medical opinion regarding the neonate’s diagnosis and prognosis and are not victims of superstition or prejudice, medical professionals are obligated to respect the parents’ informed consent, even if the professionals disagree with the parents’ opinion. In their assessments of the neonate’s interest, medical professionals can be primarily guided by their judgment regarding its diagnosis and prognosis. By contrast, the personal involvement of the parents in the decision-making process, their values and the family-specific context of the infant’s possible future makes their opinion regarding the infant’s interests significantly more convincing than the opinions of other persons involved.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Łuków, Paweł. 2020. “The Role of Parental Consent in the Medical Care of Extremely Preterm Babies”. Diametros 17 (63), 40-55. https://doi.org/10.33392/diam.1321.
Section
Articles
Share |

References

Anspach R.R. (1993), Deciding Who Lives: Fateful Choices in the Intensive-Care Nursery, University of California Press, Berkeley.
View in Google Scholar

Archard D. (2003), Children, Family, and the State, Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants, Burlington, VT.
View in Google Scholar

Bourillon A., Dehan M., Beaufils F., Fournier E. (1986), Incidence des facteurs d’environnement dans la décision éthique en réanimation pédiatrique, „Archives Françaises de Pédiatrie” 43 (suppl. 1): 563–568.
View in Google Scholar

Brosig C.L., Pierucci R.L., Kupst M.J., Leuthner S.R. (2007), Infant End-of-Life Care: The Parents’ Perspective, „Journal of Perinatology” 27 (8): 510–516.


DOI
View in Google Scholar

Buchanan A.E., Brock D.W. (1989), Deciding for Others: The Ethics of Surrogate Decision Making, Cambridge University Press, New York.


DOI
View in Google Scholar

Byrne S., Szyld E., Kattwinkel J. (2008), The Ethics of Delivery-Room Resuscitation, „Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine” 13 (6): 440–447.


DOI
View in Google Scholar

Code de la santé publique. Version consolidée au 12 mars 2018.
View in Google Scholar

Cuttini M., Casotto V., Orzalesi M., Euronic Study Group (2006), Ethical Issues in Neonatal Intensive Care and Physicians’ Practices: A European Perspective, „Acta Paediatrica Supplement” 95 (452): 42–46.


DOI
View in Google Scholar

DeGrazia D. (1995), Value Theory and the Best Interests Standard, „Bioethics” 9 (1): 50–61.


DOI
View in Google Scholar

Dehan M. (1997), L’éthique et sa pratique en neonatologie, [w:] Philosophie, éthique et droit de la médecine, J.-F. Mattéi, B. Feuillet-Le Mintier, D. Folscheid (red.), Presses Universitaires de France, Paris: 375–390.
View in Google Scholar

Diekema D.S., Mercurio M.R., Adam M.B. (2011), Clinical Ethics in Pediatrics: A Case-Based Textbook, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.


DOI
View in Google Scholar

Duff R.S. (1987), “Close-Up” Versus “Distant” Ethics: Deciding the Care of Infants with Poor Prognosis, „Seminars in Perinatology” 11 (3): 244–253.
View in Google Scholar

Elliston S. (2007), Best Interests of the Child in Healthcare (1st ed.), Routledge-Cavendish, New York.


DOI
View in Google Scholar

Elster J. (1987), Solomonic Judgments: Against the Best Interest of the Child, „University of Chicago Law Review” 54 (1): 1–45.


DOI
View in Google Scholar

Herring J. (2005), Farewell Welfare?, „Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law” 27 (2): 159–171.


DOI
View in Google Scholar

K.k. Ustawa z dnia 6 czerwca 1997 r. – Kodeks karny. Dz.U. 1997 nr 88 poz. 553 z późn. zm.
View in Google Scholar

K.r.o. Ustawa z dnia 25 lutego 1964 r. – Kodeks rodzinny i opiekuńczy, Dz.U. 1964 nr 9 poz. 59 z późn. zm.
View in Google Scholar

KEL (2004), Kodeks etyki lekarskiej: tekst jednolity z dnia 2 stycznia 2004 r., zawierający zmiany uchwalone w dniu 20 września 2003 r. przez Nadzwyczajny VII Krajowy Zjazd Lekarzy (Biuletyn NRL 2004, nr 1, poz. 84), Naczelna Izba Lekarska, Warszawa.
View in Google Scholar

Kipnis K. (2007), Harm and Uncertainty In Newborn Intensive Care, „Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics” 28 (5): 393–412.


DOI
View in Google Scholar

Kopelman L.M. (1997), The Best-Interests Standard as Threshold, Ideal, and Standard of Reasonableness, „The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy” 22 (3): 271–289.


DOI
View in Google Scholar

Kopelman L.M., Kopelman A.E. (2007), Using a New Analysis of the Best Interests Standard to Address Cultural Disputes: Whose Data, Which Values?, „Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics” 28 (5): 373–391.


DOI
View in Google Scholar

Lantos J.D., Meadow W.L. (2006), Neonatal Bioethics: The Moral Challenges of Medical Innovation, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
View in Google Scholar

McHaffie H.E., Lyon A.J., Hume R. (2001), Deciding on Treatment Limitation for Neonates: The Parents’ Perspective, „The European Journal of Pediatrics” 160 (6): 339–344.


DOI
View in Google Scholar

Mnookin R.H. (1975), Child-Custody Adjudication: Judicial Functions in the Face of Indeterminacy, „Law and Contemporary Problems” 39 (Summer): 226–293.


DOI
View in Google Scholar

Nguyen T.A.P., Ho L.Y. (2013), Review on Neonatal End-of-Life Decision-Making: Medical Authority or Parental Autonomy?, „Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare” 22 (2): 140–145.


DOI
View in Google Scholar

Nuffield Council on Bioethics (2006), Critical Care Decisions in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine: Ethical Issues, URL = https://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/assets/pdfs/Critical-care--decisions.pdf [dostęp 24.02.2020].
View in Google Scholar

Ong S.Y. (2013), The Ethics of Neonatal Resuscitation, „Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare” 22 (2): 99–102.


DOI
View in Google Scholar

Orfali K. (2004), Parental Role in Medical Decision-Making: Fact or Fiction? A Comparative Study of Ethical Dilemmas in French and American Neonatal Intensive Care Units, „Social Science & Medicine” 58 (10): 2009–2022.


DOI
View in Google Scholar

Orzalesi M.M., Cuttini M. (2011), Ethical Issues in Neonatal Intensive Care, „Annali dell’Istituto Superiore di Sanità” 47 (3): 273–277.
View in Google Scholar

Polskie Towarzystwo Neonatologiczne (2017), Zasady postępowania w neonatologii przy podejmowaniu decyzji o objęciu opieką paliatywną uwzględniające racje etyczne, wydanie II (2017) zaktualizowane i uzupełnione, [w:] Standardy opieki medycznej nad noworodkiem w Polsce, M.K. Borszewska-Kornacka et.al. (red.), Polskie Towarzystwo Neonatologiczne, Warszawa.
View in Google Scholar

Rhodes R., Holzman I.R. (2014), Is the Best Interest Standard Good for Pediatrics, „Pediatrics” 134 (suppl 2): 121–129.


DOI
View in Google Scholar

Rutkowska M. (red.) (2011), Noworodek urodzony na granicy możliwości przeżycia. Część druga: Rekomendacje dotyczące postępowania z matką oraz noworodkiem urodzonym na granicy możliwości przeżycia z uwzględnieniem aspektów etycznych, „Medycyna Wieku Rozwojowego” 2/15 (3): 356–367.
View in Google Scholar

Scanlon T. (1998), What We Owe to Each Other, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
View in Google Scholar

Shah S. (2013), Does Research with Children Violate the Best Interests Standard? An Empirical and Conceptual Analysis, „Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy” 8 (2): 121–173.
View in Google Scholar

Shaw A. (1977), Defining the Quality of Life: A Formula Without Numbers, „Hastings Center Report” 7 (5): 11.


DOI
View in Google Scholar

Sinclair J.C., Torrance G.W. (1995), The Use of Epidemiological Data for Prognostication and Decision Making, [w:] Ethics and Perinatology, A. Goldworth, W. Silverman, D.K. Stevenson, E.W.D. Young (red.), Oxford University Press, New York: 120–145.
View in Google Scholar

Szewczyk K. (2010), Decyzje krytyczne w neonatologii i standardy ich podejmowania, „Diametros” 26: 96–135.
View in Google Scholar

Szewczyk K. (2012), Czy rodzice powinni mieć prawo do decydowania o życiu i śmierci krytycznie chorych noworodków?, „Diametros” 34: 154–178.
View in Google Scholar

U.p.p. Ustawa z dnia 6 listopada 2008 r. o prawach pacjenta i Rzeczniku Praw Pacjenta, tekst jedn. Dz.U. 2009 nr 52 poz. 417 z późn. zm.
View in Google Scholar

U.z.l. Ustawa z dnia 5 grudnia 1996 r. o zawodach lekarza i lekarza dentysty, tekst jedn. Dz.U. 1997 nr 28 poz. 152 z późn. zm.
View in Google Scholar

President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research (1983), Deciding to Forego Life-Sustaining Treatment: A Report on the Ethical, Medical, and Legal Issues in Treatment Decisions. President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research: For sale by the Supt. of Docs., U.S. G.P.O., Washington, DC.
View in Google Scholar

Weir M., Evans M., Coughlin K. (2011), Ethical Decision Making in the Resuscitation of Extremely Premature Infants: The Health Care Professional’s Perspective, „Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada” 33 (1): 49–56.


DOI
View in Google Scholar

Whitney S.N. (2005), The Extremely Premature Infant at the Crossroads: Ethical and Legal Considerations, [w:] Ethical Dilemmas in Pediatrics: Cases and Commentaries, L.R. Frankel, A. Goldworth, M.V. Rorty, W.A. Silverman (red.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York.


DOI
View in Google Scholar