A Biological Theory of Death: Characterization, Justification, and Implications

Main Article Content

Michael Nair-Collins

Abstract

John P. Lizza has long been a major figure in the scholarly literature on criteria for death. His searching and penetrating critiques of the dominant biological paradigm, and his defense of a theory of death of the person as a psychophysical entity, have both significantly advanced the literature. In this special issue, Lizza reinforces his critiques of a strictly biological approach. In my commentary, I take up Lizza’s challenge regarding a biological concept of death. He is certainly right to point out that science is not value-free; however, this does not imply that there cannot be a characterization of biological death that can be shown to be superior to other concepts. After characterizing and justifying such a theory of biological death, I show that patients who meet the diagnostic criteria for brain death are unequivocally biologically alive. However, with respect to concepts of personhood and related ideas (as opposed to biology), I urge the acceptance of a pluralism of such concepts for matters of public policy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Nair-Collins, Michael. 2018. “A Biological Theory of Death: Characterization, Justification, and Implications”. Diametros 55 (55), 27-43. https://doi.org/10.13153/diam.1174.
Section
Special Topic – Defining Death: Beyond Biology
Author Biography

Michael Nair-Collins, Florida State University College of Medicine

Michael Nair-Collins, PhD
Florida State University College of Medicine
Department of Behavioral Sciences and Social Medicine
1115 West Call Street
Tallahassee, FL 32312
USA

E-mail: michael.nair-collins@med.fsu.edu

Share |

References

Banfalvi G. (1991), “Evolution of Osmolyte Systems,” Biochemical Education 19 (3): 136–139.
View in Google Scholar

Brock D. (1987), “Truth or consequences: the role of philosophers in policy-making,” Ethics 97 (4): 786–791.
View in Google Scholar

Condic M.L. (2016), “Determination of Death: A Scientific Perspective on Biological Integration,” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 41 (3): 257–278.
View in Google Scholar

DeGrazia D. (2005), Human Identity and Bioethics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
View in Google Scholar

Hall J.E. (2016), Guyton and Hall Textbook of Medical Physiology, 13th ed., Elsevier, Philadelphia.
View in Google Scholar

Khan S.S., Singer B.D., Vaughan D.E. (2017), “Molecular and physiological manifestations and measurement of aging in humans,” Aging Cell 16 (4): 624–633.
View in Google Scholar

Lakatos I. (1970), “Falsification and the methodology of research program,” [in:] Crticism and the Growth of Knowledge, I. Lakatos, A. Musgrave (eds), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
View in Google Scholar

Lizza J.P. (2006), Persons, Humanity, and the Definition of Death, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore (MD).
View in Google Scholar

Lizza J.P. (2018), “Defining Death: Beyond Biology,” Diametros 55: 1–19.
View in Google Scholar

Lock M. (2004), “Living cadavers and the calculation of death,” Body & Society 10 (2–3): 135–152.
View in Google Scholar

Moschella M. (2016), “Deconstructing the brain disconnection-brain death analogy and clarifying the rationale for the neurological criterion of death,” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 41 (3): 279–299.
View in Google Scholar

Nair-Collins M. (2013), “Brain Death, Paternalism, and the Language of ‘Death’,” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 23 (1): 53–104.
View in Google Scholar

Nair-Collins M. (2015a), “Taking Science Seriously in the Definition of Death,” Hastings Center Report 45 (6): 38–48.
View in Google Scholar

Nair-Collins M. (2015b), “Laying Futility to Rest,” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 40 (5): 554–583.
View in Google Scholar

Nair-Collins M. (2017), “Can the Brain-Dead Be Harmed or Wronged? On the Moral Status of Brain Death and its Implications for Organ Transplantation,” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 27 (4): 525–559.
View in Google Scholar

Nair-Collins M., Miller F.G. (2017), “Do the ‘Brain Dead’ Merely Appear to be Alive?” Journal of Medical Ethics 43 (11): 747–753.
View in Google Scholar

Popper K. (1963), Conjectures and Refutations, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.
View in Google Scholar

President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research (1981), Defining Death: A Report on the Medical, Legal and Ethical Issues in the Determination of Death, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington (DC).
View in Google Scholar

President’s Council on Bioethics (2008), Controversies in the Determination of Death: A White Paper by the President’s Council on Bioethics, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington (DC).
View in Google Scholar