Hume's Humanity and the Protection of the Vulnerable
Main Article Content
Abstract
Downloads
Article Details
By submitting his/her work to the Editorial Board, the author accepts, upon having his/her text recommended for publication, that Diametros applies the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) license to works we publish. Under this license, authors agree to make articles legally available for reuse, without permission or fees, for any purpose except commercial. Anyone may read, download, copy, print, distribute or reuse these articles without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as the author and original source are properly cited. The author holds the copyright without any other restrictions. Full information about CC-BY-NC: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode.
References
A – D. Hume, An Abstract of a Treatise of Human Nature, London 1740; available at: http://www.davidhume.org/ [10.2014].
View in Google Scholar
M – D. Hume, An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals, printed for A. Millar, Oxford University, Oxford 1751; D. Hume, An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals, London 1771; available at: http://www.davidhume.org/ [10.2014].
View in Google Scholar
T – D. Hume, A Treatise of Human Nature, Vol. 1–3, London 1739–1740; available at: http://www.davidhume.org/ [10.2014].
View in Google Scholar
Baier [1980] – A. Baier, “Hume on Resentment,” Hume Studies 6 (2), 1980, p. 133–149.
View in Google Scholar
Baier [1993] – A. Baier, “Moralism and Cruelty: Reflections on Hume and Kant,” Ethics 103 (3) 1993, p. 436–457.
View in Google Scholar
Barry [1989] – B. Barry, Theories of Justice, University of California Press, Berkeley 1989.
View in Google Scholar
Belmont Report [1979] – National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research, The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research, Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Washington, DC 1979; available at: http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/belmont.html [09.09.2013].
View in Google Scholar
Brown [1994] – C. Brown, “From Spectator to Agent: Hume’s Theory of Obligation,” Hume Studies 20 (1) 1994, p. 19–35.
View in Google Scholar
CIOMS Guidelines [2002] – CIOMS (Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences) in collaboration with WHO (World Health Organization), International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects, CIOMS, Geneva 2002.
View in Google Scholar
Debes [2007a] – R. Debes, “Humanity, Sympathy and the Puzzle of Hume’s Second Enquiry,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 15 (1) 2007, p. 27–57.
View in Google Scholar
Debes [2007b] – R. Debes, “Has Anything Changed? Hume’s Theory of Association and Sympathy after the Treatise,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 15 (2) 2007, p. 313–338.
View in Google Scholar
Declaration of Helsinki [2013] – U. Wiesing, R.W. Parsa-Parsi, O. Kloiber (eds.), The World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. 1964–2014: 50 Years of Evolution of Medical Research Ethics, Ferney-Voltaire Cedex: The World Medical Association 2014.
View in Google Scholar
Hanley [2011] – R.P. Hanley, “David Hume and the ‘Politics of Humanity’,” Political Theory 39 (2) 2011, p. 205–233.
View in Google Scholar
Hope [2010] – S. Hope, “The Circumstances of Justice,” Hume Studies 36 (2) 2010, p. 125–148.
View in Google Scholar
Johnson [1755] – S. Johnson, A Dictionary of the English Language, [in:] A Dictionary of the English Language: A Digital Edition of the 1755 Classic by Samuel Johnson, Brandi Besalke (ed.); available at: http://johnsonsdictionaryonline.com/ [13.10.2013].
View in Google Scholar
Kekes [1996] – J. Kekes, “Cruelty and Liberalism,” Ethics 106 (4) 1996, p. 834–844.
View in Google Scholar
Nussbaum [2006] – M. Nussbaum, Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership, Harvard University Press, Cambridge 2006.
View in Google Scholar
Ridge [2010] – M. Ridge, “David Hume, Paternalist,” Hume Studies 36 (2) 2010, p. 149–170.
View in Google Scholar
Salter [2012] – J. Salter, “Hume and Mutual Advantage,” Politics, Philosophy & Economics 11 (3) 2012, p. 302–321.
View in Google Scholar
Schmidt Radcliffe [1996] – E. Schmidt Radcliffe, “How Does the Humean Sense of Duty Motivate?” Journal of the History of Philosophy 34 (3) 1996, p. 383–407.
View in Google Scholar
Shaver [1992] – R. Shaver, “Hume on the Duties of Humanity,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 30 (4) 1992, p. 545–556.
View in Google Scholar
Taylor [2015] – J. Taylor, Reflecting Subjects: Passion, Sympathy, and Society in Hume’s Philosophy, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2015.
View in Google Scholar
Vanterpool [1988] – R.V. Vanterpool, “Hume on the ‘Duty’ of Benevolence,” Hume Studies 14 (1) 1988, p. 93–110.
View in Google Scholar
Vitz [2002] – R. Vitz, “Hume and the Limits of Benevolence,” Hume Studies 28 (2) 2002, p. 271–296.
View in Google Scholar
Vitz [2004] – R. Vitz, “Sympathy and Benevolence in Hume’s Moral Psychology,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 42 (3) 2004, p. 261–275.
View in Google Scholar