Why Compassion Still Needs Hume Today

Article Sidebar

PDF Full text
Published: Jun 19, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13153/diam.44.2015.767
Keywords:
compassion, love, imagination, sympathy, pity, suffering, grief, emotion, empirical research, healthcare

Main Article Content

Margreet van der Cingel
Windesheim University of Applied Science

Abstract

Over the past years the relevance of compassion for society and specific practices such as in healthcare is becoming a focus of attention. Philosophers and scientists discuss theoretical descriptions and defining characteristics of the phenomenon and its benefits and pitfalls. However, there are hardly any empirical studies which substantiate these writings in specific societal areas. Besides, compassion may be in the eye of attention today but has always been of interest for many contemporary philosophers as well as philosophers in the past, David Hume amongst them. Three themes related to Hume’s hypotheses on compassion are discussed and compared to outcomes of an empirical study amongst nurses and patients with a chronic disease. This comparison gives insights into the perception of those for whom compassion is of specific importance in their daily lives and into the usefulness of Hume’s notions on compassion.

Article Details

How to Cite
“Why Compassion Still Needs Hume Today”. 2015. Diametros, no. 44 (June): 140-52. https://doi.org/10.13153/diam.44.2015.767.
Issue
No. 44 (2015)
Section
Special Topic - Justice and Compassion – Hume’s Moral Philosophy and Contemporary Practical Ethics

By submitting his/her work to the Editorial Board, the author accepts, upon having his/her text recommended for publication, that Diametros applies the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license to the works we publish. Under this license, authors agree to make articles legally available for reuse, without permission or fees. Anyone may read, download, copy, print, distribute or reuse these articles without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as the author and original source are properly cited. The author holds the copyright without any other restrictions. Full information about CC-BY: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.

Author Biography

Margreet van der Cingel, Windesheim University of Applied Science

Dr Margreet van der Cingel
College professor and senior researcher
Nursing Science
School of Healthcare
Knowledge center: Innovation in care for older people
Windesheim University of Applied Science
Campus 2-6
8017 CA Zwolle
The Netherlands

E-mail: CJM.vander.Cingel@windesheim.nl

How to Cite

“Why Compassion Still Needs Hume Today”. 2015. Diametros, no. 44 (June): 140-52. https://doi.org/10.13153/diam.44.2015.767.
Share |
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

Armstrong [2011] – K. Armstrong, Twelve Steps to a Compassionate Life, The Bodley Head, London 2011.

Baart, Grypdonck [2008] – A. Baart en M. Grypdonck, Verpleegkunde en presentie, een zoektocht in dialoog naar de betekenis van presentie voor verpleegkundige zorg, Lemma, Den Haag 2008.

Cartwright [1988] – D.E. Cartwright, “Schopenhauer's Compassion and Nietzsche's Pity,” Schopenhauer-Jahrbuch (69) 1988, p. 557–567.

De Waal [2009] – F. De Waal, The Age of Empathy, Nature's Lessons for a Kinder Society, Crown Publishing Group, New York 2009.

Eriksson [2005] – K. Eriksson, “Theory of Caritative Caring,” [in:] Nursing Theorists and Their Work, A. Marriner, M.R. Alligood (eds.), Mosby Inc., Greenville, St. Louis 2005, p. 147–195.

Hume [1888] – D. Hume, A Treatise of Human Nature, Clarendon Press, Oxford 1888.

Keijsers, Jabbi [2008] – C. Keijsers, M. Jabbi, “Inferior Frontal Gyrus Activity Triggers Anterior Insula Response to Emotional Facial Expressions,” Emotion 2008, p. 775–780.

Mannion [2002] – G. Mannion, “Mitleid, Metaphysics and Morality: Understanding Schopenhauer's Ethics,” Schopenhauer-Jahrbuch (83) 2002, p. 87–117.

Nussbaum [2001] – M. Nussbaum, Upheavals of Thought, The Intelligence of Emotions, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2001.

Philippse [2004] – H. Philippse, “Hume,” [in:] De verbeelding van het denken, door Jan Bor, E. Petersma, Atlas-Contact, 2004.

Polit, Hungler [1991] – D.F. Polit, B.P. Hungler, Nursing Research Principles and Methods, 4th. edition, J.B. Lippincott Company, Philadelphia 1991.

Richmond [2004] – S. Richmond, “Being in Others: Empathy from a Psychoanalytical Perspective,” European Journal of Philosophy (12) 2004, p. 244–264.

Rickless [2013] – S.C. Rickless, “Hume's Theory of Pity and Malice,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 21 (2) 2013, p. 324–344.

Swanton [2010] – C. Swanton, “Compassion as a Virtue in Hume,” [in:] Feminist Interpretations of Hume, A. Jacobsen (ed.), Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania 2010, p. 156–173.

Tudor [2001] – S.K. Tudor, Compassion and Remorse, Acknowledging the Suffering Other, Peeters, Leuven 2001.

Van der Cingel [2009] – C.J.M. van der Cingel, “Compassion and Professional Care: Exploring the Domain,” Nursing Philosophy 10 (2) 2009, p. 124–136.

Van der Cingel [2011] – C.J.M. van der Cingel, “Compassion in Care: A qualitative Study of Older People with a Chronic Disease and Nurses,” Nursing Ethics 18 (5) 2011, p. 672–685.

Van der Cingel [2014] – C.J.M. van der Cingel, “Compassion, the Missing Link in Quality of Care,” Nurse Education Today 34 (9) 2014, p. 1253–1257.