Response to Ruud ter Meulen

Main Article Content

Ruth Chadwick

Abstract

In addition to thinking about the meanings of solidarity, it is important to address how solidarity of the appropriate sort can be cultivated. Possibilities include the transformative power of key individuals or events; and the role of institutions. In health care it is suggested that a combination of the two strategies is required.  Professional conduct includes not only acting in 'face to face' delivery, but also engaging with those institutions which enable or disable certain ways of acting, so that they are constantly subject to revision to ensure that they facilitate the provision of decent healthcare.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Chadwick, Ruth. 2015. “Response to Ruud Ter Meulen”. Diametros, no. 43 (March):21-27. https://doi.org/10.13153/diam.43.2015.711.
Section
Special Topic - Solidarity and Justice in Health Care
Author Biography

Ruth Chadwick, The University of Manchester

Prof. Ruth ChadwickProfessor of BioethicsWilliamson Building 2.13School of LawThe University of ManchesterManchesterM13 9PLE-mail: ruth.chadwick@manchester.ac.ukProfessor Ruth Chadwick is Professor of Bioethics at the University of Manchester. From 2002-2013 she directed the ESRC Centre for Economic and Social Aspects of Genomics (Cesagen). She co-edits Bioethics and Life Sciences, Society and Policy, and has served on the Council of the Human Genome Organisation, the Panel of Eminent Ethical Experts of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO), and the UK Advisory Committee on Novel Foods and Processes (ACNFP). She is Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences; of the Hastings Center, New York; of the Royal Society of Arts; and of the Society of Biology. In 2005 she won the World Technology Network Award for Ethics and in 2014 she was elected Fellow of the Learned Society of Wales.
Share |

References

Chadwick [2011] – R. Chadwick, “The Communitarian Turn: Myth or Reality?” Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 20 (4) 2011, p. 546–553.
View in Google Scholar

Habermas [1995] – J. Habermas, “Reconciliation through the Public Use of Reason: Remarks on John Rawls's Political Liberalism,” Journal of Philosophy 92 (3) 1995, p. 117–118.
View in Google Scholar

HUGO [2000] – HUGO Ethics Committee, Statement on Benefit-Sharing, Vancouver, April 2000; URL = http://www.hugo-international.org/img/benefit_sharing_2000.pdf.
View in Google Scholar

HUGO [2007] – HUGO Ethics Committee, “HUGO Statement on Pharmacogenomics (PGx): Solidarity, Equity and Governance,” Genomics, Society and Policy 3 (1) 2007, p. 44–47.
View in Google Scholar

Knoppers, Chadwick [2005] – B.M. Knoppers, R. Chadwick, “Human genetic research: emerging trends in ethics,” Nature Reviews Genetics 6 (1) 2005, p. 75–79.
View in Google Scholar

Nagy [2002] – R. Nagy, “Reconciliation in Post-Commission South Africa: Thick and Thin Accounts of Solidarity,” Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue Canadienne de Science Politique 35 (2) 2002, p. 323–346.
View in Google Scholar

Prainsack, Buyx [2011] – B. Prainsack, A. Buyx, Solidarity: Reflections on an emerging concept in bioethics, Nuffield Council on Bioethics 2011.
View in Google Scholar

Spinosa et al. [1995] – C. Spinosa, F. Flores, H. Dreyfus, “Disclosing New Worlds: Entrepreneurship, Democratic Action, and the Cultivation of Solidarity,” Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 38 (1–2) 1995, p. 3–63.
View in Google Scholar

Warnock [1971] – G. Warnock, The Object of Morality, Methuen, London 1971.
View in Google Scholar

Williams, Chadwick [2012] – G. Williams, R. Chadwick, “Responsibilities for Healthcare: Kantian Reflections,” Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics (21) 2012, p. 1–11.
View in Google Scholar