Solidarity in Bioethics Today. Classical Problems, New Challenges (in Polish)

Main Article Content

Aleksandra Małgorzata Głos

Abstract

Solidarity is the fundamental principle of the majority of the European health care systems. According to the classical distinction, there are three kinds of solidarity: risk solidarity, age solidarity and income solidarity. The aim of this principle is to create a community based on risk sharing, mutual obligation and care, taken especially of the suffering, the troubled and the disadvantaged. The progressive privatization of health care and the individualization of risk in health insurance motivate the question about the sustainability of this principle in many European health care systems. Concurrently, technological progress change the outlook of modern medicine and health care, inspiring the revival of the debate on the role of solidarity in health care systems and new struggles for this principle. Discussions of ethical issues, social activism and the implementation of new legislative solutions stress the importance and the unchanging value of solidarity in varying social conditions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Głos, Aleksandra Małgorzata. 2014. “Solidarity in Bioethics Today. Classical Problems, New Challenges (in Polish)”. Diametros, no. 42 (December):83-105. https://doi.org/10.13153/diam.42.2014.683.
Section
Special Topic - Cross sections of bioethics
Author Biography

Aleksandra Małgorzata Głos, Uniwersytet Jagielloński

Aleksandra Małgorzata GłosWydział Prawa i AdministracjiInstytut FilozofiiUniwersytet Jagiellońskiolaglos@gmail.com
Share |

References

Aarden, Van Hoyweghen, Horstman [2010] – E. Aarden, I. Van Hoyweghen, K. Horstman, Solidarity in practices of provision: distributing access to genetic technologies in health care in Germany, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom, „New Genetics and Society” 29 (4) 2010, s. 369–388.
View in Google Scholar

Ashcroft [2007] – R. Ashcroft, Should genetic information be disclosed to insurers?, „British Medical Journal” (334) 2007, s. 1197–1212.
View in Google Scholar

Banfield [1967] – E.C. Banfield, The moral basis of backward society, Free Press, New York, 1967.
View in Google Scholar

Buyx, Prainsack [2011] – A. Buyx, B. Prainsack, Solidarity: reflections on an emerging concept in bioethics, The Nuffield Council on Bioethics 2011.
View in Google Scholar

Buyx [2008] – A. Buyx, Personal responsibility for health as a rationing criterion: why we don‘t like it and why maybe we should, „Journal of Medical Ethics” (34) 2008, s. 871–874.
View in Google Scholar

Campbell, Jones [2001] – A. Campbell, S. Jones, The historical and philosophical backgrounds of ‘solidarity’ in UK social welfare, [w:] R. ter Meulen, W. Arts, R. Muffels, Solidarity in health and social care in Europe, Springer Science Business Media, Dordrecht 2001, s. 298–413.
View in Google Scholar

Chadwick, Berg [2001] – R. Chadwick, K. Berg, Solidarity and equity: New ethical frameworks for genetic databases, „Nature Reviews Genetics” (2/4) 2001, s. 318–321.
View in Google Scholar

Daniels [2004] – N. Daniels, The functions of insurance and the fairness of genetic underwriting, [w:] M.A. Rothstein (red.), Genetics and life insurance: medical underwriting and social policy, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 2004, s. 119–145.
View in Google Scholar

Dawson, Verweij [2012] – A. Dawson, M. Verweij, Solidarity: a Moral Concept in Need of Clarification, „Public health ethics” 5 (1) 2012.
View in Google Scholar

Durkheim [1893] – E. Durkheim, O podziale pracy społecznej, tłum. K. Wakar, PWN, Warszawa 1999.
View in Google Scholar

Eckenwiller, Straehle, Chung [2012] – L. Eckenwiller, Ch. Straehle, R. Chung, Global solidarity, migration and global health inequity, „Bioethics” 26 (7) 2012, s. 382–390.
View in Google Scholar

Epstein [2007] – L.H. Epstein (et al.), Food reinforcement, the dopamine D2 receptor genotype, and energy intake in obese and nonobese humans, „Behavioral Neuroscience” 121 (5) 2007, s. 877–886.
View in Google Scholar

European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies [2009] – S. Thomson, T. Foubister, E. Mossialos, Financing health care in the European Union, European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies 2009, dostępne na: http://www.euro.who.int/data/assets/pdf_file/0009/98307/E92469.pdf.
View in Google Scholar

Fox-Keller [2002] – E. Fox-Keller, Making sense of life: explaining biological development with models, metaphors and machines, Harvard University Press, Cambridge 2002.
View in Google Scholar

Gubernatis [1997] – G. Gubernatis, Solidarity model of nonmonetary incentive could increase organ donation and justice in organ allocation at the same time, „Transplantation Pro- ceedings” 1997, s. 3264–3266.
View in Google Scholar

Gubernatis, Kliemt [2000] – G. Gubernatis, H. Kliemt, Solidarity model: A way to cope with rationing problems in organ transplantation, „Transplant International” 2000 (13), s. 607–608.
View in Google Scholar

Gunson [2009] – D. Gunson, Solidarity and the universal declaration on bioethics and human rights, „Journal of Medicine and Philosophy” 34 (3) 2009, s. 241–260.
View in Google Scholar

Harper [1993] – P.S. Harper, Insurance and genetic testing, „Lancet” (341) 1993, s. 224–227.
View in Google Scholar

Häyry [2005] – M. Häyry, Precaution and solidarity, „Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics” (14/2) 2005, s. 199–206.
View in Google Scholar

Houtepen, ter Meulen [2001] – R. Houtepen, R. ter Meulen, Solidarity, justice, reflexivity and participatory citizenship, [w:] R. ter Meulen, W. Arts, R. Muffels, Solidarity in health and social care in Europe, Springer Science Business Media, Dordrecht 2001, s. 451–463.
View in Google Scholar

Husted [1999] – J. Husted, Insurance, genetics and solidarity, [w:] T. McGleenan, U. Wiesing, F. Ewald (red.), Genetics and Insurance, BIOS, Oxford 1999, s. 1–16.
View in Google Scholar

Jaeggi [2001] – R. Jaeggi, Solidarity and indifference, [w:] R. ter Meulen, W. Arts, R. Muffels, Solidarity in health and social care in Europe, Springer Science Business Media, Dordrecht 2001, s. 287–307.
View in Google Scholar

Johnsson [2010] – J. Johnson et al., Hypothetical and Factual Willingness to Participate in Biobank Research, „European Journal of Human Genetetics” 18 (11) 2010, s. 1261–1264.
View in Google Scholar

Joly, Braker, Le Huynh [2010] – Y. Joly, M. Braker, M. Le Huynh, Genetic discrimination in private insurance: global Perspectives, „New Genetics and Society” 29 (4) 2010, s. 351–368.
View in Google Scholar

Jończyk [2001] – J. Jończyk, Prawo zabezpieczenia społecznego, Wolters Kluwer, Kraków 2001.
View in Google Scholar

Kornai [2002] – J. Kornai, Solidarność w procesie transformacji, tłum. M. Awdziej, Wydawnictwo Wyższej Szkoły Przedsiębiorczości i Zarządzania, Warszawa 2002.
View in Google Scholar

Klug [2005] – H. Klug, Campaigning for life. Buiding a new transnational solidarity in the face of HIV/AIDS and TRIPS, [w:] B. de Sousa Santos, C. Rodríguez-Garavito (red.), Law and Counter-Hegemonic Globalization: Toward a Subaltern Cosmopolitan Legality, Cambridge University Press 2005, s. 118–139.
View in Google Scholar

Knoppers, Chadwick [2005] – B.M. Knoppers, R. Chadwick, Human genetic research: Emerging trends in ethics, „Nature Reviews Genetics” (6/1) 2005, s. 75–79.
View in Google Scholar

Lach [2011] – D.E. Lach, Zasada równego dostępu do opieki zdrowotnej, Wolters Kluwer, Warszawa 2011.
View in Google Scholar

Lemke [2005] – T. Lemke, Beyond genetic discrimination: problems and perspectives of a contested notion, „Genomics, Society and Policy” 1 (3) 2005, s. 22–40.
View in Google Scholar

Liukko [2010] – J. Liukko, Genetic discrimination, insurance, and solidarity: an analysis of the argumentation for fair risk classification, „New Genetics & Society” (29/4) 2010, s. 457–475.
View in Google Scholar

Maarse, ter Meulen [2008] – H. Maarse, R. ter Meulen, Increasing individual responsibility in Dutch health care: is solidarity losing ground, „The Journal of Medicine and Philoso- phy” 33 (3) 2008, s. 262-279.
View in Google Scholar

Malpas [2008] – P.J. Malpas, Is genetic information relevantly different from other kinds of non-genetic information in the life insurance context?, „Journal of Medical Ethics” (34) 2008, s. 548–551.
View in Google Scholar

Nagel [1970] – T. Nagel, The possibility of altruism, Clarendon Press, Oxford 1970.
View in Google Scholar

NCoB [2011] – NCoB, Biofuels: ethical issues: xxiv, dostępne na: http://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/sites/default/files/Biofuels_ethical_issues_FU LL%20REPORT_0.pdf.
View in Google Scholar

Nelkin, Lindee [2004] – D. Nelkin, M.S. Linde, The DNA mystique: the gene as a cultural icon, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor 2004.
View in Google Scholar

O’Neill, [1997] – O. O’Neill, Genetic information and insurance: some ethical issues, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London, „Biological Sciences” (352) 1997, s. 1087–1093.
View in Google Scholar

Paolucci, den Exter, van de Ven [2006] – F. Paolucci, A. den Exter, W. van de Ven, Solidarity in competitive health insurance markets: analysing the relevant EC legal framework, „Health Economics, Policy and Law“ 2006, s. 107–126.
View in Google Scholar

Pawlikowski [2013] – J. Pawlikowski, Biobankowanie ludzkiego materiału genetycznego dla celów naukowych – aspekty organizacyjne, etyczne, prawne i społeczne, Wydawnictwo Uniwerystetu Medycznego w Lublinie, Lublin 2013.
View in Google Scholar

Pogge [2010] – T. Pogge, M. Rimmer, K. Rubinstein (red.), Incentives for global public health. Patent Law and Access to Essential Medicines, Cambridge University Press, New York 2010.
View in Google Scholar

Prainsack, Buyx [2013] – B. Prainsack, A. Buyx, A solidarity-based approach to the governance of research biobanks, „Medical Law Review” (21) 2013, s. 71–91.
View in Google Scholar

Rawls [1971] – J. Rawls, Teoria sprawiedliwości, tłum. M. Panufnik, J. Pasek, A. Romaniuk, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa 2013.
View in Google Scholar

Rimmer [2008] – M. Rimmer, Race Against Time: The Export of Essential Medicines to Rwanda, „Public Health Ethics” 1 (2) 2008, s. 89–103.
View in Google Scholar

Saunders [2012] – B. Saunders, Altruism or solidarity? Two motives for organ donation and two proposals, „Bioethics” (26–27) 2012, s. 376–381.
View in Google Scholar

Schmidt [2007] – H. Schmidt, Personal Responsibility for Health: Developments Under the German Healthcare Reform, „European Journal of Health Law” (14) 2007, s. 241–250.
View in Google Scholar

Stjernschantz Forsberg, Hansson, Eriksson [2009] – J. Stjernschantz Forsberg, M.G. Hansson, S. Eriksson, Changing perspectives in biobank research: from individual rights to concerns about public health regarding the return of results, „European Journal of Human Genetics” (17) 2009, s. 1544–1549.
View in Google Scholar

Van Hoyweghen, Horstman, Schepers [2005] – I. van Hoyweghen, K. Horstman, R. Schepers, Genetics is not the issue: insurers on genetics and life insurance, „New Genetics and Society” 24 (1) 2005, s. 79–98.
View in Google Scholar

Van Hoyweghen, Horstman [2010a] – I. Van Hoyweghen, K. Horstman, Solidarity matters: embedding genetic technologies in private and social insurance arrangements, „New Ge- netics and Society” 29 (4) 2010, s. 343–350.
View in Google Scholar

Van Hoyweghen [2010b] – I. van Hoyweghen, Taming the wild life of genes by law? Genes reconfiguring solidarity in private insurance, „New Genetics & Society” (19/4) 2010, s. 431–455.
View in Google Scholar

Volkmann [1998] – U. Volkmann, Solidarität. Programm und Prinzip der Verfassung, Mohr Siebeck Tübingen 1998.
View in Google Scholar

WHO [2011] – 10 facts on health inequities and their causes, WHO 2011, dostępne na: http://www.who.int/features/factfiles/health_inequities/en/.
View in Google Scholar

Young, [1990] – I.M. Young, Justice and the Politics of Difference, Princeton University Press, Princeton 1990.
View in Google Scholar

Zajdało [2012] – J. Zajadło, Idea solidarności we współczesnej filozofii prawa i filozofii polityki, [w:] A. Łabno (red.), Idea solidaryzmu we współczesnej filozofii prawa i polityki, Wydawnictwo Sejmowe, Warszawa 2012.
View in Google Scholar

Most read articles by the same author(s)