Locke’s Epistemological Anthropocentrism (in Polish)

Article Sidebar

PDF (Polish) PDF (In Polish) Full text (Polish)
Published: Sep 1, 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13153/diam.37.2013.531
Keywords:
Locke, Descartes, empiricism, innatism, epistemology, anthropology, idea, perception, representationalism

Main Article Content

Dawid Misztal
University of Łódź

Abstract

Reading Locke’s philosophy mainly as criticism of the Cartesian innatism results in disguising its tensions and motives. Although the article is not completely free of this popular strategy of interpretation, it aims at avoiding its simplifications. This allows to show the complexity of the relation of Locke’s philosophy to the fundamental ideas of innatism and to bring out contradictory interests he hopes to reconcile.

Article Details

How to Cite
“Locke’s Epistemological Anthropocentrism (in Polish)”. 2013. Diametros, no. 37 (September): 107-26. https://doi.org/10.13153/diam.37.2013.531.
Issue
No. 37 (2013)
Section
Articles

By submitting his/her work to the Editorial Board, the author accepts, upon having his/her text recommended for publication, that Diametros applies the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license to the works we publish. Under this license, authors agree to make articles legally available for reuse, without permission or fees. Anyone may read, download, copy, print, distribute or reuse these articles without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as the author and original source are properly cited. The author holds the copyright without any other restrictions. Full information about CC-BY: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.

Author Biography

Dawid Misztal, University of Łódź

Dawid Misztal, PhD
University of Łódź
Department of Philosophy
ul. Kopcińskiego 16/18
Pl-90-232 Łódź
e-mail: dawkom@gmail.com

How to Cite

“Locke’s Epistemological Anthropocentrism (in Polish)”. 2013. Diametros, no. 37 (September): 107-26. https://doi.org/10.13153/diam.37.2013.531.
Share |
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

Allison [1966] – H.E. Allison, Locke’s Theory of Personal Identity: A Re-Examination, „Journal of History of Ideas” 27 (1) 1966, s. 41-58.

Ayers [1998] – M. Ayers, Locke: idee i rzeczy, tłum. S. Stecko, Amber, Warszawa 1998.

Balibar [2002] – E. Balibar, Possessive Individualism Reversed: From Locke to Derrida, „Constelations” 9 (3) 2002, s. 299-317.

Cudworth [1731] – R. Cudworth, Concerning Eternal and Immutable Morality, London 1731.

Dainton [2008] – B. Dainton, Phenomenal Self, Oxford University Press, New York, Oxford 2008.

Descartes [1937] – R. Descartes, Prawidła kierowania umysłem, tłum. L. Chmaj, Warszawa 1937.

Descartes [1994] – R. Descartes, Rozprawa o metodzie, tłum. T. Boy-Żeleński, Agencja Wydawnicza MOREX, Warszawa 1994.

Descartes [1960] – R. Descartes, Zasady filozofii, tłum. I. Dąmbska, PWN, Warszawa 1960.

Hume [1951] – D. Hume, Traktat o naturze ludzkiej, tłum. Cz. Znamierowski, Polska Akademia Umiejętności, Kraków 1951.

Locke [1979] – J. Locke, An Essay concerning Human Understandig, Oxford University Press, Oxford 1979.

Locke [1955] – J. Locke, Rozważania dotyczące rozumu ludzkiego, tłum. B. Gawecki, PWN, Warszawa 1955.

Lukács [1980] – G. Lukács, Młody Hegel, tłum. M. Siemek, PWN, Warszawa 1980.

Milton [1994] – J.R. Milton, Locke’s Life and Time, [w:] The Cambridge Companion to Locke, red. V. Chappell, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1994.

Reid [1785] – T. Reid, Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man, Dublin 1785, dostępne: http://www.earlymoderntexts.com/reip.html.

Renaut [2001] – A. Renaut, Era jednostki. Przyczynek do historii podmiotowości, tłum. D. Leszczyński, Ossolineum, Wrocław 2001.

Rickless [2007] – S.C. Rickless, Locke’s Polemic against Nativism, [w:] The Cambridge Companion to Locke’s ‘Essay’, red. L. Newman, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2007.

Rodis-Lewis [2000] – G. Rodis-Lewis, Kartezjusz i racjonalizm, tłum. S. Cichowicz, Prószyński i S-ka, Warszawa 2000.

Rogers [2007] – G.A.J. Rogers, The Intellectual Setting and Aims of the ‘Essay', [w:] The Cambridge Companion to Locke's ‘Essay’, red. L. Newman, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2007.

Schmaltz [1996] – T.M. Schmaltz, Malebranche’s Theory of the Soul. A Cartesian Interpretation, Oxford University Press, New York Oxford 1996.

Schnädelbach [2001a] – H. Schnädelbach, Próba rehabilitacji animal rationale, tłum. K. Krzemieniowa, Oficyna Naukowa, Warszawa 2001.

Schnädelbach [2001b] – H. Schnädelbach, Rozum i historia, tłum. K. Krzemieniowa, Oficyna Naukowa, Warszawa 2001.

Sieczkowski [2008] – T. Sieczkowski, Aprioryczne źródła poznania i ich rola w episteologicznym schemacie wiedzy, „Internetowy Magazyn Filozoficzny HYBRIS” (6) 2008, dostępne: http://www.filozof.uni.lodz.pl/hybris/pdf/Sieczkowski%202.pdf http://www.filozof.uni.lodz.pl/hybris/pdf/Sieczkowski2.pdf.

Taylor [2001] – Ch. Taylor, Źródła podmiotowości. Narodziny tożsamości nowoczesnej, tłum. M. Gruszczyński, O. Latek, A. Lipszyc, A. Michalak, A. Rostkowska, M. Rychter, Ł. Sommer, PWN, Warszawa 2001.

Uzgallis [1998] – B. Uzgallis, Paideia and Identity: Meditations on Hobbes and Locke, „The 20th World Congress of Philosophy Papers” 1998, dostępne: http://www.bu.edu/ wcp/Papers/Mode/ModeUzga.htm.

Waldron [2002] – J. Waldron, God, Locke, and Equality. Christian Foundations in Locke’s Political Thought, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2002.