The multiplicity of religions and the realism-antirealism debate in religion (in Polish)

Main Article Content

Piotr Sikora

Abstract

In this paper I first briefly outline the difficulty of maintaining a realistic interpretation of religious discourse in the context of religious pluralism. Then I present two attempts to reconcile religious realism and pluralism. The first is John Hick’s proposal, the second the 'internalist pluralism' developed by Victoria Harrison on the basis of Putnam's internal realism (and in opposition to Hick’s conception). I point out the weaknesses of these theories. Finally, I outline my own proposal, based on a slightly different interpretation of internal realism than Harrison’s internalist pluralism, namely by using the pragmatic aspects of Putnam's thought. He argues that pragmatic-realistic pluralism avoids the weaknesses of Hick’s and Harrison’s conceptions while at the same time sharing their strengths.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Sikora, Piotr. 2011. “The Multiplicity of Religions and the Realism-Antirealism Debate in Religion (in Polish)”. Diametros, no. 29 (September):93-109. https://doi.org/10.13153/diam.29.2011.448.
Section
Articles
Author Biography

Piotr Sikora, Jesuit University of Philosophy and Education

Piotr Sikora, PhD Jesuit University of Philosophy and Education ul. Kopernika 26, 31-501 KrakówPoland Piotr.Sikora@ignatianum.edu.pl
Share |

References

Harrison [2006a] – V. Harrison, Internal Realism, and the Problem of Religious Diversity, “Philosophia” (34) 2006, s. 287-301.
View in Google Scholar

Harrison [2006b] – V. Harrison, The Pragmatics of Defining Religion in a Multicultural World, “The International Journal for Philosophy of Religion” 59 (3) 2006, s. 133–152.
View in Google Scholar

Harrison [2008] – V. Harrison, Internal Realism, Religious Pluralism and Ontology, “Philosophia” (36) 2008, s. 97-110.
View in Google Scholar

Herrmann [2003] – E. Herrmann, A Pragamatic Realist Philosophy of Religion, “Ars Disputandi” (3) 2003, dostępne na: http://www.ArsDisputandi.org.
View in Google Scholar

Hick [1989] – J. Hick, An Interpretation of Religion. Human Responses to the Transcendent, New Haven 1989.
View in Google Scholar

Hick [1994a] – J. Hick, Argumenty za istnieniem Boga, tłum. M. Kuniński, Znak, Kraków 1994.
View in Google Scholar

Hick [1994b] – J. Hick, Wiara chrześcijańska w świetle koncepcji doświadczania-jako, „Znak” (464) 1994.
View in Google Scholar

Hick [2000] – J. Hick, Ineffability, “Religious Studies” (36) 2000, s. 35-46.
View in Google Scholar

Hick [2005] – J. Hick, Piąty wymiar, tłum. J. Grzegorczyk, Zysk i S-ka, Warszawa 2005.
View in Google Scholar

McIntyre [1997] – A. McIntyre, Postawa religijna, [w:] Filozofia religii. Fragmenty filozofii analitycznej, Aletheia-Spacja, Warszawa 1997.
View in Google Scholar

Nagel [1997] – T. Nagel, Widok znikąd, tłum. C. Cieśliński, Fundacja Aletheia, Warszawa 1997.
View in Google Scholar

Philips [1997] – D.Z. Philips, Wiara religijna a gry językowe, [w:] Filozofia religii. Fragmenty filozofii analitycznej, Aletheia-Spacja, Warszawa 1997.
View in Google Scholar

Rowe [1999] – W. Rowe, Religious pluralism, “Religious Studies” (35) 1999, s. 139-150.
View in Google Scholar

Scott [2000] – M. Scott, Framing the realism question, “Religious Studies” (36) 2000, s. 455-471.
View in Google Scholar

Sikora [1999] – P. Sikora, Znikąd nie widać nic, „Znak” 529 (6) 1999, s. 133-139.
View in Google Scholar

Sikora [2004] – P. Sikora, Słowa i zbawienie. Dyskurs religijny w perspektywie filozofii Hilarego Putnama, Universitas, Kraków 2004.
View in Google Scholar

Sikora [2008] – P. Sikora, Realizm i teologia, [w:] Metafizyka i teologia. Debata u podstaw, R. Woźniak (red.), WAM, Kraków 2008.
View in Google Scholar

Sikora P. [2010] – P. Sikora, Atheism, Agnosticism, and Apophatic Theism, “Polish Journal of Philosophy” IV (1) 2010, s. 65-80.
View in Google Scholar