What does Kripke mean by "a priori?"

Main Article Content

Pierre Baumann

Abstract

This paper argues that Kripke's claim that there are contingent a priori truths would be vitiated by a seemingly unorthodox understanding of the term "a priori".

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Baumann, Pierre. 2011. “What Does Kripke Mean by ‘a priori?’”. Diametros, no. 28 (June):1-7. https://doi.org/10.13153/diam.28.2011.433.
Section
Articles
Author Biography

Pierre Baumann

dr Pierre Baumann Department of Philosophy University of Puerto Rico, Río Piedras
Share |

References

Ayer [1946] – A.J. Ayer, Language, Truth, and Logic, Dover, New York 1946.
View in Google Scholar

Devitt [2005] – M. Devitt, There is no a priori, [in:] Contemporary Debates in Epistemology,
View in Google Scholar

E. Sosa and M. Steup (eds.), Blackwell, Cambridge, MA 2005: 105-115.
View in Google Scholar

Hale [1987] – B. Hale, Abstract Objects, Blackwell, Oxford 1987.
View in Google Scholar

Hughes [2004] – C. Hughes, Kripke, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2004.
View in Google Scholar

Kant [1781/2003] – I. Kant, Critique of Pure Reason, trans. by N. Kemp Smith, Palgrave Macmillan, Houndsmills 1781/2003.
View in Google Scholar

Kripke [1980] – S. Kripke, Naming and Necessity, Blackwell, Oxford 1980.
View in Google Scholar

Salmon [1988] – N. Salmon, How to measure the standard metre, “Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society” (88) 1988: 193-217.
View in Google Scholar

Wittgenstein [1953] – L. Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations, Blackwell, Oxford 1953.
View in Google Scholar