Moral disagreement concerning abortion
Main Article Content
Abstract
I use the example of abortion to show that there are some unresolvable moral disagreements. I list four sources of unresolvable moral disagreement: 1) differences in the rankings of the basic evils of death, pain, disability, loss of freedom, and loss of pleasure, 2) differences in the interpretation of moral rules, 3) ideological differences in the view of human nature and human societies, and 4) differences concerning who is impartially protected by the moral rules. It is this last difference that is the source of unresolvable disagreement concerning the moral acceptability of abortion. I examine the views of Don Marquis and Mary Ann Warren who present opposing arguments concerning the moral acceptability of abortion. I show that their failure to take account of this last difference leads to flaws in their arguments that show that neither has been successful in showing that their position is the uniquely correct one.
Article Details
By submitting his/her work to the Editorial Board, the author accepts, upon having his/her text recommended for publication, that Diametros applies the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license to the works we publish. Under this license, authors agree to make articles legally available for reuse, without permission or fees. Anyone may read, download, copy, print, distribute or reuse these articles without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as the author and original source are properly cited. The author holds the copyright without any other restrictions. Full information about CC-BY: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.
How to Cite
References
Bernat, Gert, Mogielnicki [1993] – J. Bernat, B. Gert and R.P. Mogielnicki, Patient refusal of hydration and nutrition. An alternative to physician assisted suicide or voluntary euthanasia, “Archives of Internal Medicine” (153) 1993: 2723-2728.
Feinberg, Dwyer [1997] – The Problem of Abortion, Joel Feinberg and Susan Dwyer (ed.), 3rd ed., Belmont, Calif. 1997.
Rawls [1971] – John Rawls, A Theory of Justice, Harvard University Press, Cambridge 1971.
Thomson [1997] – Judith Jarvis Thomson, A defense of abortion, [in:] The Problem of Abortion, Joel Feinberg and Susan Dwyer (ed.), 3rd ed., Wadsworth, Belmont, Calif. 1997: 59-74.