Clinical Ethics Consultation in the United Kingdom
Main Article Content
Abstract
Article Details
By submitting his/her work to the Editorial Board, the author accepts, upon having his/her text recommended for publication, that Diametros applies the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license to the works we publish. Under this license, authors agree to make articles legally available for reuse, without permission or fees. Anyone may read, download, copy, print, distribute or reuse these articles without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as the author and original source are properly cited. The author holds the copyright without any other restrictions. Full information about CC-BY: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.
How to Cite
References
Agich, Youngner [1991] – G.J. Agich, S.J. Youngner, For Experts Only? Access to Hospital Ethics Committees, “Hastings Center Report”, September-October 1991: 17-24.
Annas [1991] – G.J. Annas, Ethics Committees: From Ethical Comfort to Ethical Cover, “Hastings Center Report”, May-June 1991: 18-21.
Doyal [2001] – L. Doyal, Clinical ethics committees and the formulation of health care policy, “Journal of Medical Ethics” 27, 2001: 44-49.
DuVal et al. [2001] – G. DuVal et al., What triggers requests for ethics consultations?, “Journal of Medical Ethics” 27, 2001 (suppl I): i24-i29.
Ethics in Practice [2005] – Ethics in Practice: Background and Recommendations for Enhanced Support, Royal College of Physicians, London, 2005.
Godkin et al. [2005] – M.D. Godkin et al., Project Examining Effectiveness in Clinical Ethics (PEECE): phase 1 – descriptive analysis of nine clinical ethics services, “Journal of Medi- cal Ethics” 31, 2005: 505–512.
Hoffman [1991] – D.E. Hoffman, Regulating Ethics Committees in Health Care Institutions – Is It Time?, “Maryland Law Review” 50, 1991: 746-797.
http://www.ethics-network.org.uk/committees (accessed on 26/10/2009). http://www.ethox.org.uk (accessed on 26/10/2009).
McLean [2008] – S.A.M. McLean, Clinical Ethics Committees: a due process wasteland?, “Clinical Ethics” 3, 2008: 99-104.
McLean [2005] – S.A.M. McLean, Law and Ethics: A New Governance Issue?, “Clinical Risk” 11, 2005: 1-5.
Orlowski et al. [2006] – J.P. Orlowski et al., Why doctors use or do not use ethics consultation, “Journal of Medical Ethics” 32, 2006: 499-502.
Re Quinlan [1976] – In Re Quinlan, NJ 1976, 355 A2d 647.
Slowther et al. [2001] – A. Slowther, C. Bunch, B. Woolnough, T. Hope, Clinical ethics support services in the UK: an investigation of the current provision of ethics support to health professionals in the UK, “Journal of Medical Ethics” 27, 2001 (suppl I): i2-i8.
Slowther et al. [2004] – A. Slowther, C. Johnston, J. Goodall, T. Hope, Development of clinical ethics committees, “BMJ” 328, 2004: 950-952.
Sokol [2009] – D. Sokol, The unpalatable truth about ethics committees, “BMJ” 339, 2009: b4179.
Sokol[2005] – D.K. Sokol, Meeting the ethical needs of doctors: We need clinical ethicists in addition to other measures, “BMJ” 330, 2005: 741-742.
Spielman [2001] – B. Spielman, Has Faith in Health Care Ethics Consultants Gone Too Far? Risks of an Unregulated Practice and a Model Act to Contain Them, “Marquette Law Review” 85, 2001: 161-221.
Van der Kloot Meijburg, ter Meulen [2001] – H.H. Van der Kloot Meijburg, R.H.J. ter Meulen, Developing standards for institutional ethics committees: lessons from the Neth- erlands, “Journal of Medical Ethics” 27, 2001 (suppl. I): i36-i40.
Wolf [1992] – S.M. Wolf, Due process in ethics committee case review, “ HEC Forum” 4, 1992: 83-96.