The 4-Step Approach. Ethics case discussion in hospitals

Article Sidebar

PDF (Język Polski) PDF
Published: Dec 1, 2009
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13153/diam.22.2009.361

Main Article Content

Andrea Dörries

Abstract

The goal of an ethics case discussion is to find the best decision for the patient and the other persons involved (relatives, doctors, nurses and others) from an ethical point of view, in a communicative respect and from a psychosocial view. In the end, it may not mean changing one’s view or even one’s own position, but rather to exchange arguments, weight them and come to a consensus as to further action. The latter is important as the topics concern patients and require action. For the moderator an ethics case discussion in this sense is no judgement, no taking over of responsibility for the decision result, no taking over of a leading role, and no team supervision. However, ethics case discussion has become a valuable tool to deal with moral conflicts in hospitals. Opportunities and problems of ethics case discussions are discussed. A 4-step approach for structuring the course of an ethics case discussion is presented.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Dörries, Andrea. 2009. “The 4-Step Approach. Ethics Case Discussion in Hospitals”. Diametros, no. 22 (December):39-46. https://doi.org/10.13153/diam.22.2009.361.
Issue
No. 22 (2009)
Section
Special topic - Clinical Ethics Committees

By submitting his/her work to the Editorial Board, the author accepts, upon having his/her text recommended for publication, that Diametros applies the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license to the works we publish. Under this license, authors agree to make articles legally available for reuse, without permission or fees. Anyone may read, download, copy, print, distribute or reuse these articles without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as the author and original source are properly cited. The author holds the copyright without any other restrictions. Full information about CC-BY: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.

Author Biography

Andrea Dörries

Andrea Dörries, dr. med. Zentrum für Gesundheitsethik Hannover / Germany
Share |
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

ASBH [1998] – American Society for Bioethics and Humanities: Core competencies for health care ethics consultation. Glenview, Il, 1998.
View in Google Scholar

Bardon [2004] – A. Bardon, Ethics education and value priorization among members of U.S: hospital ethics committees, “Kennedy Institute Ethics Journal” 2004 (14): 395-406.
View in Google Scholar

Berkowitz, Dubler [2004] – K.A. Berkowitz, N. Dubler, Role plays: practicing mediation skills, in: N. Dubler, C. Liebman, Bioethics Mediation. A guide shaping shared solutions, United Hospital Fund, New York, 2004: 139-170.
View in Google Scholar

Boldt [2008] – J. Boldt, Klinische Ethikberatung: Expertenwissen oder Moderationskompetenz? Thesen und Erfahrungen aus der Freiburger Praxis, in: D. Groß, A.T. May, A. Simon (eds.), Beiträge zur Klinischen Ethikberatung an Universitätskliniken, Lit, Münster, 2008: 81-90.
View in Google Scholar

Delfosse [2002] – M.L. Delfosse, Some thoughts on ethics and the role of philosophers in ethics committees, in: G. Lebeer (ed.), Ethical function in hospital ethics committees, IOS Press, Amsterdam/Berlin, 2002: 151-160.
View in Google Scholar

DEK [1997] – Deutscher Evangelischer Krankenhausverband, Katholischer Krankenhausverband Deutschlands e.V. (Hrsg.), Ethik-Komitee im Krankenhaus, Freiburg, 1997.
View in Google Scholar

Dörries [2003] – A. Dörries, Mixed feelings - physicians’ concerns about clinical ethics committees in Germany, “HEC Forum” (15) 2003: 245-257.
View in Google Scholar

Dörries et al. [2008] – A. Dörries, G. Neitzke, A. Simon, J. Vollmann (eds.), Klinische Ethikberatung, Kohlhammer, Stuttgart, 2008.
View in Google Scholar

Dörries [2008] – A. Dörries, Beispiel einer ethischen Falldiskussion in vier Schritten, in: A. Dörries, G. Neitzke, A. Simon, J. Vollmann (eds.), Klinische Ethikberatung, Kohlhammer, Stuttgart, 2008: 111-115.
View in Google Scholar

Dörries et al. [2009] – A. Dörries, G. Neitzke, A. Simon, J. Vollmann,
View in Google Scholar

Qualifizierungsporgramm Hannover “Ethikberatung im Krankenhaus”. Konzeption und Ausblick, in: J. Vollmann, J. Schildmann, A. Simon (eds.), Klinische Ethik, Campus, Frankfurt/New York, 2009: 125-138.
View in Google Scholar

Dubler, Liebman [2004] – N. Dubler, C.B. Liebman, Bioethics Mediation. A guide shaping shared solutions, United Hospital Fund, New York, 2004.
View in Google Scholar

Dubler, Liebman [2009] – N. Dubler, C.B. Liebman, Bioethics mediation, in: J. Vollmann, J. Schildmann, A. Simon (eds.), Klinische Ethik, Campus, Frankfurt/New York, 2009: 15-36.
View in Google Scholar

Jonsen [2005] – A.R. Jonsen, Casuistic reasoning in medical ethics, in: M. Düwell, J.N. Neumann (eds.), Wieviel Ethik verträgt die Medizin?, Mentis, Paderborn, 2005: 147- 164.
View in Google Scholar

Kettner [1994] – M. Kettner, Discourse ethics and health care ethics committees, in: B.S. Byrd, J. Hruschka, J.C. Joerden (eds.), „Annual Review of Law and Ethics” (4) 1994: 249- 272.
View in Google Scholar

Molewijk et al. [2008] – B. Molewijk, H. Verkerk, H. Milius, G. Widdershoven, Implementing moral case deliberation in a psychiatric hospital: process adn outcome, “Med Health Care Philos” (11) 2008: 43-56.
View in Google Scholar

Neitzke [2005] – G. Neitzke, Was ist der Fall? Argumente für eine Zuspitzung der Kasuistischen Methode, in: M. Düwell, J.N. Neumann (eds.), Wieviel Ethik verträgt die Medizin?, Mentis, Paderborn, 2005: 211-224.
View in Google Scholar

Post et al. [2007] – L.F. Post, J. Blustein, N. Dubler, Handbook for health care ethics committees, John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 2007.
View in Google Scholar

Simon, Gillen [2001] – A. Simon, E. Gillen, Klinische Ethik-Komitees in Deutschland. Feigenblatt oder praktische Hilfestellung in Konfliktsituationen, in: D. von Engelhardt, V. von Loewenich, A. Simon (eds.), Die Heilberufe auf der Suche nach ihrer Identität, Münster, 2001: 151-157.
View in Google Scholar

Spencer et al. [2000] – E.M. Spencer, A.E. Mills, M.V. Rorty, P.H. Werhane, Organization ethics in health care, Oxford University Press, New York/Oxford, 2000.
View in Google Scholar

Steinkamp, Gordijn [2005] – N. Steinkamp, B. Gordijn, Ethik in Klinik und Pflegeeinrichtung. 2n ed., Luchterhand, Köln, 2005.
View in Google Scholar

Viafora [1999] – C. Viafora, Towards a methodology for the ethical analysis of clinical practice, “Medicine, health care and philosophy” (2) 1999: 283-297.
View in Google Scholar

Vollmann [2008a] – J. Vollmann, Klinische Ethikkomitees und Ethikberatung in Deutschland: Bisherige Entwicklung und zukünftige Perspektiven, „Bioethica Forum” (1) 2008: 33-40.
View in Google Scholar

Vollmann [2008b] – J. Vollmann, Methoden der ethischen Falldiskussion, in: A. Dörries, G. Neitzke, A. Simon, J. Vollmann (eds.), Klinische Ethikberatung, Kohlhammer, Stutt- gart, 2008: 87-102.
View in Google Scholar

Vollmann [2008c] – J. Vollmann, Prozess der Implementierung, in: A. Dörries, G. Neitzke, A. Simon, J. Vollmann (eds.), Klinische Ethikberatung, Kohlhammer, Stuttgart, 2008: 116-129.
View in Google Scholar

Winkler [2005] – E. Winkler, Organisatorische Ethik – ein erweiterter Auftrag für klinische Ethikkomitees?, in: M. Düwell, J.N. Neumann (eds.), Wieviel Ethik verträgt die Medizin?, Mentis, Paderborn, 2005: 259-273.
View in Google Scholar