Is perception concept-dependent according to Kant?

Main Article Content

Anna Tomaszewska

Abstract

The paper focuses on a discussion about McDowell’s "conceptualist" interpretation of Kant’s theory of experience, as one in which all representational content is identified with conceptual content. Both in Mind and WorldM and in his Woodbridge Lectures, McDowell furthers a reading on which the "picture of visual experiences as conceptual shapings of visual consciousness is already deeply Kantian", supporting it with Kant’s famous claim from the A51/ B75 passage of the Critique of Pure Reason, which can be called a Cooperation Thesis. However, much indicates that McDowell’s reading is, if not altogether false, then at least one-sided. In the "Transcendental Aesthetic", as well as in some of the pre-Critical writings (Concerning the ultimate foundation of the differentiation of regions in space or the "Inaugural Dissertation"), Kant presented a range of arguments for a subjective, non-discursive character of space and time, i.e. the forms of sensible intuition and pure intuitions themselves, underlying all conceptual cognition, and providing a non-conceptual basis for a special kind of synthetic a priori cognition (geometry). This allows us to conclude that he would rather take the side of the contemporary “nonconceptualists”, and could be regarded as their predecessor, to use R. Hanna’s formulation. On this reading of the Kantian theory of empirical cognition, intentionality is independent of and prior to any application of concepts to the objects of experience.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Tomaszewska, Anna. 2013. “Is Perception Concept-Dependent According to Kant?”. Diametros, no. 15 (November):57-73. https://doi.org/10.13153/diam.15.2008.293.
Section
Articles
Author Biography

Anna Tomaszewska

Anna Tomaszewska, doktorantka w Zakładzie Historii Filozofii Instytutu Filozofii UJ.
Share |

References

Bermúdez [1995] – Jose Luis Bermúdez, Nonconceptual Content: From Perceptual Experience to Subpersonal Computational States, “Mind and Language” 10 (4), 1995.
View in Google Scholar

Crane [1988] – Tim Crane, The Waterfall Illusion, “Analysis” 48 (3), 1988.
View in Google Scholar

Dennett [1996] – Daniel C. Dennett, Content and Consciousness, Routledge, London-New York 1996.
View in Google Scholar

Dretske [1981] – Fred Dretske, Sensation and Perception, in: Gunther [2003].
View in Google Scholar

Dretske [1993] – Fred Dretske, Conscious experience, “Mind” 102, 1993.
View in Google Scholar

Dretske [1995] – Fred Dretske, Naturalizing the Mind, The MIT Press, Cambridge 1995.
View in Google Scholar

Falkenstein [2004] – Lorne Falkenstein, Kant’s Intuitionism. A Commentary on the Transcendental Aesthetic, University of Toronto Press, Toronto 2004.
View in Google Scholar

Frege [1952] – Gottlob Frege, On Concept and Object, in: Peter Geach, Max Black, Translations from Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege, Oxford University Press, Oxford 1952.
View in Google Scholar

Gunther [2001] – York H. Gunther, Content, Illusion, Partition, “Philosophical Studies” 102, 2001.
View in Google Scholar

Gunther [2003] – York H. Gunther (ed.), Essays on Nonconceptual Content, The MIT Press, Cambridge 2003.
View in Google Scholar

Hanna [2005] – Robert Hanna, Kant and Nonconceptual Content, “European Journal of Philosophy” 13 (2), 2005.
View in Google Scholar

Hegel [1986] – Georg W. F. Hegel, Glauben und Wissen oder die Reflexionsphilosophie der Subjektivität, in der Vollständigkeit ihrer Formen, als Kantische, Jacobische und Fichtesche Philosophie, in: id., Jenaer Kritische Schriften (III), Felix Meiner Vg., Hamburg 1986.
View in Google Scholar

Kant [1967] – Immanuel Kant, Philosophical Correspondence 1759-99, translated by Arnulf Zweig, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1967.
View in Google Scholar

Kant [1968] – Immanuel Kant, Selected Pre-Critical Writings and Correspondence with Beck, translated by G. B. Kerferd and D. E. Walford, Manchester University Press, New York 1968.
View in Google Scholar

Kant [1992] – Kant’s Introduction to Logic and his essay on the Mistaken Subtlety of the Four Figures, translated by Thomas Kingsmill Abbott, Thoemmes Press, Bristol 1992.
View in Google Scholar

Kant [1998] – Immanuel Kant, Critique of Pure Reason, translated by Allen W. Wood and Paul Guyer, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1998.
View in Google Scholar

Kant [1998a] – Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, hrsg. v. Jens Timmermann, Felix Meiner Vg., Hamburg 1998.
View in Google Scholar

McDowell [1994] – John H. McDowell, Mind and World, Harvard University Press, Cambridge 1994.
View in Google Scholar

McDowell [1994a] – John H. McDowell, The Concept of Perceptual Experience, “The Philosophical Quarterly” 44, 1994.
View in Google Scholar

McDowell [1998] – John H. McDowell, Lecture III: Intentionality as a Relation, “The Journal of Philosophy” 95 (9), 1998.
View in Google Scholar

Wolff [1910] – Wolffsche Begriffsbestimmungen. Ein Hilfsbüchlein bei Studium Kants, zusammengestellt von J. Baumann, Verlag der Dürr`schen Buchhandlung, Leipzig 1910
View in Google Scholar