Utilitarianism’s response to virtue ethics

Main Article Content

Natasza Szutta


The subject of the article is the current debate between virtue ethics and the proponents of utilitarianism, who represent one of the most important ethical conceptions present in analytic philosophy. Among other things, advocates of virtue ethics blame utilitarianism and ethics based on the deontological model for the long absence of virtue in thinking about morality; they do not accept the strong consequentialist suppositions of utilitarianism and criticize the fundamental ambiguity of the category of happiness in this theory.

A closer analysis of contemporary utilitarianism shows that the objections of advocates of virtue ethics have been overcome in some of the positions formulated on the ground of utilitarianism. Moreover, there have also appeared several attempts to reinterpret utilitarianism in the spirit of virtue ethics, for example, R. Crisp’s virtue utilitarianism, R. Adams’ motive utilitarianism, and P. Railton’s value utilitarianism. This seems to imply that the basic principles of utilitarianism and virtue ethics are not as divergent as has often been assumed.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Szutta, Natasza. 2007. “Utilitarianism’s Response to Virtue Ethics”. Diametros, no. 11 (March):40-60. https://doi.org/10.13153/diam.11.2007.267.
Author Biography

Natasza Szutta, Uniwersytet Gdański

Natasza Szutta Uniwersytet Gdański
Share |


Adams [1976] – Robert M. Adams, Motive Utilitarianism, „The Journal of Philosophy” (73) 1976, s. 467-481.

Anscombe [1958] – Elizabeth Anscombe, Modern Moral Philosophy, „Philosophy” (33) 1958, s. 1-19; wielokrotnie przedrukowywany.

Brandt [1981] – Richard B. Brandt, W. K. Frankena and Ethics of Virtue, „Monist” (64) 1981, s. 271-292.

Brandt [1996] – Richard B. Brandt, Etyka. Zagadnienia etyki normatywnej i metaetyki, tłum. Barbara Stanosz, PWN, Warszawa 1996.

Brink [1989] – David Brink, Utilitarian Morality and the Personal Point of View, „Journal of Philosophy” (83) 1989, s. 423-427.

Crisp [1992] – Roger Crisp, Utilitarianism and the Life of Virtue, ”Philosophical Quarterly” (167) 1992, s. 139-160.

Driver [2001] – Julia Driver, Uneasy Virtue, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2001.

Foot [1985] – Philippa Foot, Utilitarianism and the Virtues, „Mind” (64) 1985, s. 196-206.

Goodin [1998] – Robert E. Goodin, Użyteczność i dobro, w: Przewodnik po etyce, red. Peter Singer, Książka i Wiedza, Warszawa 1998.

Harrod [1939] – R. F. Harrod, Utilitarianism Revised, „Mind” (55) 1939, s. 137-156.

Harsanyi [1982] – John Harsanyi, Some Epistemological Advantages of Rule Utilitarian Position in Ethics, „Midwest Studies in Philosophy” (7) 1982, s. 389-403.

Louden [2004] – Robert B. Louden, Etyka cnót a stanowisko antyteoretyczne w etyce, w: Etyka i charakter, red. Jacek Jaśtal, Aureus, Kraków 2004.

MacIntyre [1996] – Alasdair MacIntyre, Dziedzictwo cnoty, tłum. Adam Chmielewski, PWN, Warszawa 1996.

Railton [1988] – Peter Railton, How Thinking about Character and Utilitarianism Might Lead to Rethinking the Character of Utilitarianism, „Midwest Studies in Philosophy” (13) 1988, s. 398-416.

Slote [1992] – Michael Slote, From Morality to Virtue, Oxford University Press, New York 1992.

Slote [1988] – Michael Slote, Utilitarian Virtue, „Midwest Studies in Philosophy” (13) 1988, s. 384-397.

Stocker [1987] – Michael Stocker, The Schizophrenia of Modern Ethical Theories, w: The Virtues. Contemporary Essays on Moral Character, red. Robert B. Kruschwitz, Robert C. Roberts, Wadsworth Publishing Company, California 1987.

Strasser [1990] – Mark Strasser, The Virtues of Utilitarianism, „Philosophia” (20) 1990, s. 209-226.

Szutta [2004] – Natasza Szutta, Status współczesnej etyki cnót, „Diametros” (1) 2004, s. 70-84.

Powyższy artykuł jest fragmentem mojej książki pt. Współczesna etyka cnót. Projekt nowej etyki?, która w tym roku ukaże się nakładem Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego.