The subjectivity of the Great Apes

Article Sidebar

PDF (Język Polski)
Published: Sep 1, 2006
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13153/diam.9.2006.255

Main Article Content

Robert Roczeń

Abstract

The question of the intellectual abilities and personal features of the Great Apes is widely discussed in academic literature. The discourse usually concentrates on comparisons to the human mind, but such criteriona areis not reliable because they don’t allow us to analysisze the personal being of primates in terms of its fundamental features. The borderline between Homo sapiens and the Great Apes is not as sharp as it seems. There is a continuous transition between them as regards Pparticulars phenomena, which. makes it possible to single out only extreme examples. Do the Great Apes therefore have features which put them in a special position in terms of humans law? The notion of “person” makes enables us to consider this issue.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Roczeń, Robert. 2006. “The Subjectivity of the Great Apes”. Diametros, no. 9 (September):126-35. https://doi.org/10.13153/diam.9.2006.255.
Issue
No. 9 (2006)
Section
Ecology and the Human Condition

By submitting his/her work to the Editorial Board, the author accepts, upon having his/her text recommended for publication, that Diametros applies the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license to the works we publish. Under this license, authors agree to make articles legally available for reuse, without permission or fees. Anyone may read, download, copy, print, distribute or reuse these articles without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as the author and original source are properly cited. The author holds the copyright without any other restrictions. Full information about CC-BY: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.

Author Biography

Robert Roczeń

Dr n. med. Robert Roczeń, anestezjolog, pracuje w Sanofi-Aventis Sp.z o. o. jako Medical Manager. Interesuje się filozofią medycyny, bioetyką. Autor i współautor artykułów oraz referatów z etyki medycznej, transplantologii i tanatologii. Publikował m.in. w „Archiwum Historii i Filozofii Medycyny” (4/2001), „Etyce” (35/2002), „Zagadnieniach Naukoznawstwa” (2/2005). Śmierć mózgu a dopuszczalność transplantacji w etykach religii monoteistycznych to temat pracy doktorskiej, której przewód wszczęto w Instytucie Filozofii Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza.
Share |
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

Andersen [2004] – J. R. Andersen i wsp., Contagiuos yawning in chimpanzees, ”Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci.”, Supl. 6: 468-470, 2004.
View in Google Scholar

Byrne, Whiten [1988] – R. W. Byrne & A. Whiten, Machiavellian Intelligence: Social Expertise and the Evolution of Intellect in Monkeys, Apsl, and Humans, Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press, Oxford 1988.
View in Google Scholar

Dennet [1983] – D. C. Dennett, Intentional systems in cognitive ethology: The”Panglossian paradigm” defended, ”Behavioral and Brain Sciences”, 6: 343- 90, 1983.
View in Google Scholar

Dunbar [1993] – R. I. M. Dunbar, The co-evolution of neocortical size, group size and the evolution of language in humans, ”Behavioral and Brain Sciences”, 16: 681-735, 1993.
View in Google Scholar

Fouts [1999] – R. Fouts, Najbliżsi krewni, tłum. A. Jankowski, Media Rodzina, Poznań 1999.
View in Google Scholar

Fuster [1997] – J. M. Fuster, The Prefrontal Cortex: Anatomy, Physiology, and Neu- ropsychology of the Frontal Lobe, (third edition), Lippincott-Raven Publishers, Philadelphia 1997.
View in Google Scholar

Gallup [1970] – G.G. Gallup Jr, Chimpanzees: self-recognition, ”Science”, 167: 86-87, 1970.
View in Google Scholar

Gallup [1985] – G. G. Gallup Jr, Do minus exist in species other than our own?, ”Neurosci Biobehav Rev”, 9: 631-41, 1985.
View in Google Scholar

Gallup [1998a] – G. G. Gallup Jr, Self- awareness and the evolution of social intel- ligence, ”Behav. Proc.”, 42: 239-47, 1998.
View in Google Scholar

Gallup [1998b] – G. G. Gallup Jr, Can animals empathize?, ”Sci. Am. Presents”, 9 (4 spec. ed.): 66-71, 1998.
View in Google Scholar

Goodall [1995] – J.Goodall, Przez dziurkę od klucza, tłum. J. Prószyński, Prószyński i S-ka, Warszawa 1995.
View in Google Scholar

Griffin [2004] – D. R. Griffin, Umysły zwierząt, tłum. M. Ślósarska, A. Tabaczyńska GWP, Gdańsk 2004.
View in Google Scholar

Habermas [2003] – J. Habermas, Przyszłość natury ludzkiej, tłum. M. Łukasiewicz, Wydawnictwo Naukowe SCHOLAR, Warszawa 2003.
View in Google Scholar

Hare [2000] – B. Hare et al., Chimpanzees know what conspecifics do and do not see, ”Animal Behaviour”, 59: 771-785, 2000.
View in Google Scholar

Heyes [1998] – C.M. Heyes, Theory of mind in nonhuman primates, ”Behavioral and Brain Sciences” 21: 101-148, 1998.
View in Google Scholar

Lawick – Goodall [1974] – J. van Lawick-Goodall, W cieniu człowieka, tłum. G. Bujalska-Grüm i L. Grüm, PWN, Warszawa 1974.
View in Google Scholar

Lefebvre [2002] – L. Lefebvre et al., Tools and brains in bird, ”Behaviour”, 139: 939-973, 2002.
View in Google Scholar

Lewin [2002] – R. Lewin, Wprowadzenie do ewolucji człowieka, tłum. A. Tomaszewski, Prószyński i S-ka, Warszawa 2002.
View in Google Scholar

Locke [1955] – J. Locke, Rozważania dotyczące rozumu ludzkiego, tłum. B.J. Gawecki. PWN, Warszawa 1955.
View in Google Scholar

Menzel [1999] – C.R. Menzel, Unprompted recall and reporting of hidden objects by a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) after extended delays, ”Journal of Comparative Psychology”, 113: 1-9, 1999.
View in Google Scholar

Milner [1967] – E. Milner, Human neural and behavioral development, Charles C. Thomas, Spriengfield 1967.
View in Google Scholar

Nagel [1997] – Thomas Nagel, Jak to jest być nietoperzem, tłum. A. Romaniuk, w: Pytania ostateczne, Fundacja Aletheia, Warszawa 1997.
View in Google Scholar

Pinker, Bloom [1990] – S. Pinker & P. Bloom, Natural language and natura selection, ”Behavioral and Brain Sciences”, 1: 707-784, 1990.
View in Google Scholar

Posiad, Więckowski [1983] – A. Posiad, Z. Więckowski, Mały słownik terminów i pojęć filozoficznych, Instytut Wydawniczy Pax, Warszawa 1983.
View in Google Scholar

Povinelli [1992] – D. J. Povinelli et al., Comprehension of Role Reversal in Chim- panzees: Evidence of Empathy? ”Animal Behaviour”, 43(4): 633-640, 1992.
View in Google Scholar

Premarck, Woodruff [1978] – D. Premack & G. Woodruff, Does the chimpanze have a theory of mind? ”Behavioral and Brain Sciences”, 1: 515-526, 1978.
View in Google Scholar

Reber, Reber [ 2005] – A. S. Reber & E. S. Reber, Słownik psychologii, tłum. I. Kurcz, K. Skarżyńska, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar, Warszawa 2005.
View in Google Scholar

Schaik [ 2006] – C. van Schaik, Początki małpiej kultury, „Świat Nauki”, 5(177): 56-63, 2006.
View in Google Scholar

Schaik [2006] – C. van Schaik Początki małpiej kultury, „Świat Nauki”, 5(177): 56-63, 2006.
View in Google Scholar

Silk [2002] – J. B. Silk, Using the ’F-word’ in primatology, ”Behaviour”, 139: 421- 446, 2002.
View in Google Scholar

Singer [2003] – P. Singer, Etyka praktyczna, tłum. A. Sagan, Książka i Wiedza, Warszawa 2003.
View in Google Scholar

Singer [2004] – P. Singer, Wyzwolenie zwierząt, tłum. A. Alichniewicz, A. Szczęsna, PIW, Warszawa 2004.
View in Google Scholar

Speamann [2001] – R. Speamann, Osoby. O różnicy między czymś a kimś, Oficyna naukowa, Warszawa 2001.
View in Google Scholar

Swedenborg [2005] – E. Swedenborg, O stosunkach pomiędzy duszą i ciałem, tłum. A. Sawicki, Miniatura, Kraków 2005.
View in Google Scholar

Vander Waal, Jenkins [2003] – S. B. Vander Wall, S. H. Jenkins, Reciprocal pilferage and the evolution of ford-hoarding behaviour, ”Behavioral Ecology”, 14: 656-667, 2003.
View in Google Scholar

Waal [1996] – F. B. M. de Waal, Good natured: The origins of Right and Wrong in Humans and Other Animal, Harvard University Press, Cambridge 1996.
View in Google Scholar