A Fairness-Based Defense of Non-Punitive Responses to Crime
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
In this paper, we offer a defense of non-punitive measures as morally justified responses to crime within a framework of society as a fair system of cooperation among free and equal individuals. Our argument proceeds in three steps. First, we elaborate on the premises of our argument: we situate criminal acts within a model of society as a fair system of cooperation, identify the types of unfair disadvantages crimes bring about, and consider the social aim of the criminal justice system. Next, we reject the claim defended by fair-play retributivists that fairness considerations make punishment a necessary response to criminal acts. In the last step, we demonstrate that it is rather non-punitive responses to crime that are warranted under the principle of fairness and, as such, are morally justified. We conclude the paper by rejecting two possible objections to our defense: the “responsibility gap” and the “victims’ claim to justice” objections.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
By submitting his/her work to the Editorial Board, the author accepts, upon having his/her text recommended for publication, that Diametros applies the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license to the works we publish. Under this license, authors agree to make articles legally available for reuse, without permission or fees. Anyone may read, download, copy, print, distribute or reuse these articles without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as the author and original source are properly cited. The author holds the copyright without any other restrictions. Full information about CC-BY: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.
References
Bell M. (2021), “Abolition: A New Paradigm for Reform,” Law & Social Inquiry 46 (1): 32–68.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/lsi.2020.21
Benn S.I. (1958), “An Approach To The Problems Of Punishment,” Philosophy 33 (127): 325–341.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031819100055017
Boonin D. (2008), The Problem of Punishment, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511819254
Brew B., Alani F., Li A., Wildeman C. (2022), “Sticky Stigma: The Impact of Incarceration on Perceptions of Personality Traits and Deservingness,” Social Forces 100 (4): 1910–1934.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soab091
Caruso G. (2021), Rejecting Retributivism: Free Will, Punishment, and Criminal Justice, Cambridge University Press (Law and the Cognitive Sciences), Cambridge.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108689304
Cohen G.A. (2011), On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice, and Other Essays in Political Philosophy, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691148700.001.0001
Costelloe M.T., Chiricos T., Gertz M. (2009), “Punitive Attitudes Toward Criminals: Exploring the Relevance of Crime Salience and Economic Insecurity,” Punishment & Society 11 (1): 25–49.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474508098131
Cox S.M., Allen J.M., Hanser R.D., Conrad J.J. (2021), Juvenile Justice: A Guide to Theory, Policy, and Practice, SAGE Publications, Los Angeles.
Crime Survivors Speak – The First-ever National Survey of Victims’ Views on Safety and Justice (n.a.), Tides Center, URL = https://allianceforsafetyandjustice.org/crimesurviorsspeaks/report [Accessed 7.12.2023].
Dagger R. (1993), “Playing Fair with Punishment,” Ethics 103 (3): 473–488.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/293522
Dagger R. (2018), Playing Fair: Political Obligation and the Problems of Punishment, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199388837.003.0005
Davis M. (1983), “How to Make the Punishment Fit the Crime,” Ethics 93 (4): 726–752.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/292491
Davis M. (1991), “Criminal Desert, Harm and Fairness,” Israel Law Review 25 (3–4): 524–548.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021223700010608
Davis M. (1993), “Criminal Desert and Unfair Advantage: What’s the Connection?,” Law and Philosophy 12 (2): 133–156.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02346476
Duff R. A. (2007), Answering for Crime: Responsibility and Liability in the Criminal Law, Hart Publishing, Oxford, Portland.
Fagan J. (2010), “The Contradictions of Juvenile Crime & Punishment,” Daedalus 139 (3): 43–61.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/DAED_a_00022
Feinberg J. (1987), The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law: Volume 1: Harm to Others, Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0195046641.001.0001
Fingarette H. (1977), “Punishment and Suffering,” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 50 (6): 499–525.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3129785
Golash D. (2006), The Case Against Punishment: Retribution, Crime Prevention, and the Law, NYU Press, New York and London.
Hampton J. (1984), “The Moral Education Theory of Punishment,” Philosophy & Public Affairs 13 (3): 208–238.
Hampton J. (1988), “The Retributive Idea,” [in:] Forgiveness and Mercy, J. F. Murphy, J. Hampton (eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 111–161.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511625121.006
Hampton J. (1991), “Correcting Harms versus Righting Wrongs: The Goal of Retribution,” UCLA Law Review (39).
Kuehn S., Vosgerau J. (2022), “The Public’s Overestimation of Immorality of Formerly Incarcerated People,” Journal of Experimental Criminology [Preprint].
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-022-09534-w
Moore K. E., Stuewig J. B., Tangney J. P. (2016), “The Effect of Stigma on Criminal Offenders’ Functioning: A Longitudinal Mediational Model,” Deviant Behavior 37 (2): 196–218.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2014.1004035
Morris H. (1968), “Persons and Punishment,” The Monist 52 (4): 475–501.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/monist196852436
Murphy D.S., Fuleihan B., Richards S.C., Jones R.S. (2011), “The Electronic “Scarlet Letter”: Criminal Backgrounding and a Perpetual Spoiled Identity,” Journal of Offender Rehabilitation 50 (3): 101–118.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10509674.2011.560548
Murphy J. (1995), “Marxism and Retribution,” [in:] Punishment, A.J. Simmons, M. Cohen, J. Cohen, C.R. Beitz (eds), Princeton University Press, Princeton: 3–30.
Rawls J. (1964), “Legal Obligation and the Duty of Fair Play,” [in:] Law and Philosophy: A Symposium, S. Hook (ed.), New York University Press, New York: 3–18.
Rawls, J. (2005), Political Liberalism: Expanded Edition, Columbia University Press, New York.
Sadurski W. (1985), Giving Desert Its Due: Social Justice and Legal Theory, Springer Science & Business Media (Law and Philosophy Library), Dordrecht.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7706-9
Sher G. (1987), Desert, Princeton University Press: Studies in Moral, Political, and Legal Philosophy.
Sher G. (1997), Approximate Justice: Studies in Non-ideal Theory, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Tadros V. (2011), The Ends of Harm: The Moral Foundations of Criminal Law, Oxford Legal Philosophy, Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199554423.001.0001
Tadros V. (2020), “Distributing Responsibility,” Philosophy & Public Affairs 48 (3): 223–261.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/papa.12163
Walen A. (2021), “Retributive Justice,” [in:] The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, E.N. Zalta (ed.), Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, URL = https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2021/entries/justice-retributive/ [Accessed: 21.05.2022].
Wolff J., de-Shalit A. (2007), Disadvantage, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199278268.001.0001
Zimmerman M. J. (2011), The Immorality of Punishment, Peterborough, Broadview Press, Ont. Buffalo, New York.