Atheist Therapy: Radical Embodiment in Early Modern Medical Materialism
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Materialism as a doctrine is, of course, a part of the history of philosophy, even if it was often a polemical construct, and it took until the 18th century for philosophers to be willing to call themselves materialists. Difficulties also have been pointed out in terms of “continuity,” i.e., does what Democritus, Lucretius, Hobbes and Diderot have to say about matter, the body and the soul all belong in one discursive and conceptual frame? Interestingly, materialism is also a classic figure in the history of medicine, often intersecting with philosophical considerations. Notably, the question of body-soul relations. This is apparent in Galen’s treatise on body and soul and then much more massively in the early modern period (with reference to Galen, but also Lucretius, and Aristotelian naturalism). In the following essay I reflect on the exact nature of early modern medical materialism, its philosophical status and contribution.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
By submitting his/her work to the Editorial Board, the author accepts, upon having his/her text recommended for publication, that Diametros applies the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license to the works we publish. Under this license, authors agree to make articles legally available for reuse, without permission or fees. Anyone may read, download, copy, print, distribute or reuse these articles without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as the author and original source are properly cited. The author holds the copyright without any other restrictions. Full information about CC-BY: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.
How to Cite
References
Alexandrescu V. (2013), “Regius and Gassendi on the Human Soul,” Intellectual History Review 23 (4): 433–452.
Andrault R. (2016), La raison des corps. Mécanisme et sciences médicales, Vrin, Paris.
Andrault R. (2019), “Spinoza’s Missing Physiology,” Perspectives on Science 287 (2): 214–243.
Anon. (2003), L’Âme Matérielle (approx. 1725–1730), A. Niderst (ed.), 3rd edition, H. Champion, Paris.
Barry J., Bigotti F. (eds.) (2022), Santorio Santori and the Emergence of Quantified Medicine, 1614–1790: Corpuscularianism, Technology and Experimentation, Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
Barsanti G. (1995), “La naissance de la biologie: observations, théories, métaphysiques en France 1740–1810,” [in:] Nature, Histoire, Société: essais en hommage à J. Roger, C. Blanckaert, J.-L. Fischer, R. Rey (eds.), Klincksieck, Paris: 197–227.
Bernier F. (1678), Abregé de la philosophie de Mr. Gassendi, 8 vols., Anisson et Possuel, Lyon.
Bitbol- Hespériès A. (1993), “Descartes et Regius: Leur pensée médicale,” [in:] Descartes et Regius: Autour de l’Explication de l’esprit humain, T. Verbeek (ed.), Rodopi, Amsterdam: 47–68.
Bloch O. (1995), Le matérialisme, 2nd edition, PUF (Que sais-je?), Paris.
Bloch O. (1998), Matière à histoires, J. Vrin, Paris.
Booth E. (2005), A Subtle and Mysterious Machine. The Medical World of Walter Charleton (1619–1707), Springer, Dordrecht.
Boyle R. (1965), The Works of the Honourable Robert Boyle (1772), T. Birch (ed.), 6 vols., London, reprint, Olms, Hildesheim.
Browne T. (1892), “Religio Medici” (1643), [in:] Writings of Sir Thomas Browne, D. Lloyd Roberts (ed.), David Stott, London.
Cabanis P.J.G. (1956), Rapports du physique et du moral de l’homme (1802), [in:] OEuvres philosophiques, C. Lehec, J. Cazeneuve (eds.), 2 vols., PUF, Paris: vol. 1.
Citton Y. (2006), L’Envers de la Liberté. L’invention d’un imaginaire spinoziste dans la France des Lumières, Éditions Amsterdam, Paris.
Coward W. (1702), Second Thoughts on Human Soul, R. Basset, London.
Descartes R. (1964–1974), OEuvres, C. Adam, P. Tannery (eds.), 11 vols., J. Vrin, Paris (cited as AT followed by volume and page number).
Diderot D. (1975-), OEuvres complètes, H. Dieckmann, J. Proust, J. Varloot (eds.), Hermann, Paris.
Duncan S. (2022), Materialism from Hobbes to Locke, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Galen (1997), Selected Works, P.N. Singer (ed., trans.), Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Garber D. (1998), “Soul and Mind: Life and Thought in the Seventeenth Century,” [in:] The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy, vol. 1, D. Garber, M. Ayers (eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 759–795.
Giglioni G. (1997), “The Machines of the Body and the Operations of the Soul in Marcello Malpighi’s Anatomy,” [in:] Marcello Malpighi: Anatomist and Physician, D. Bertoloni Meli (ed.), Leo S. Olschki, Florence: 149–174.
Giglioni G.M. (2018), “Medical Approaches to the Mind in the Late Middle Ages and the Renaissance,” [in:] Philosophy of Mind in the Late Middle Ages and Renaissance, vol. 3: The History of the Philosophy of Mind, S. Schmid (ed.), Routledge, London: 41–62.
Hankinson R.J. (1991), “Galen’s Anatomy of the Soul,” Phronesis 36 (2): 197–233.
Henry J. (1989), “The Matter of Souls: Medical Theory and Theology in Seventeenth-Century England,” [in:] The Medical Revolution of the Seventeenth Century, R.K. French, A. Wear (eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 87–113.
Huneman P., Wolfe C.T. (2017), “Man-Machines and Embodiment: From Cartesian Physiology to Claude Bernard’s ‘Living Machine’,” [in:] Embodiment, J.E.H. Smith (ed.), Oxford University Press (Oxford Philosophical Concepts), Oxford: 257–297.
Hutchins B., Wolfe C.T., Eriksen C.B. (2016), “The Embodied Descartes: Contemporary Readings of L’Homme,” [in:] Descartes’ Treatise on Man and its Reception, D. Antoine-Mahut, S. Gaukroger (eds.), Springer, Dordrecht: 287–304.
Kaitaro T. (2004), “Brain-Mind Identities in Dualism and Materialism: A Historical Perspective,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 35: 627–645.
King L.S. (1963), “Stahl and Hoffmann: A Study in Eighteenth-Century Animism,” Journal of the History of Medicine 37: 15–24.
La Mettrie J.O. de, Boerhaave H. (1747), Institutions de médecine de M. Hermann Boerhaave, trans. with commentary by La Mettrie, 2nd edition, vol. 5, Huart & Cie, Paris.
La Mettrie J.O. de (1987), OEuvres philosophiques, F. Markovits (ed.), 2 vols., Fayard-“Corpus”, Paris.
Lamy G. (1996), Discours anatomiques. Explication méchanique et physique des fonctions de l’âme sensitive, A. Minerbi Belgrado (ed.), Voltaire Foundation, Oxford.
Le Camus A. (1753), Médecine de l’esprit, où l’on traite des dispositions et des causes physiques qui sont des conséquences de l’union de l’âme avec le corps, influant sur les opérations de l’esprit; et des moyens de maîtriser ses opérations dans un bon état ou de les corriger quand elles sont viciées, Ganeau, Paris.
Levitin D. (2015), Ancient Wisdom in the Age of the New Science: Histories of Philosophy in England, c. 1640–1700, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Locke J. (1976–1989), The Correspondence, E.S. De Beer (ed.), 8 vols., Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Lo Presti R. (2010), “La machine plus que machine ou l’automate transfiguré. L’anthropologie de J.O. de La Mettrie et la réinvention du mécanisme médical,” Gesnerus 67 (2): 163–187.
Mersenne M. (1653), La perspective curieuse du R. P. Niceron, Minime divisée en quatre livres avec l’Optique et la Catoptrique du R. P. Mersenne,... du même ordre, mise en lumière après la mort de l’auteur, J. du Puis, Paris.
Mitrovic B. (2009), “Defending Alexander of Aphrodisias in the Age of the Counter-Reformation: Iacopo Zabarella on the Mortality of the Soul according to Aristotle,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 91: 330–354.
Montaigne M. de (1992), Essais (1588, 1595), P. Villey (ed.), 3 vols., PUF, Paris.
Paster G.K. (1997), “Nervous Tension: Networks of Blood and Spirit in the Early Modern Body,” [in:] The Body in Parts. Fantasies of Corporeality in Early Modern Europe, D. Hillman, C. Mazzio (eds.), Routledge, London: 107–125.
Pine M.L. (1986), Pietro Pomponazzi, Radical Philosopher of the Renaissance, Antenore, Padua.
Rather L.J. (1965), Mind and Body in Eighteenth-Century Medicine. A Study Based on J. Gaub’s ‘De regimine mentis’, University of California Press, Berkeley, Los Angeles.
Regius H. (1646), Fundamenta physices, Elzevier, Amsterdam.
Rey R. (1985), “Diderot et la médecine de l’esprit,” [in:] Denis Diderot, 1713–1784, Colloque international, A.-M. Chouillet (ed.), Aux Amateurs de Livres, Paris: 287–296.
Rey R. (2000), Naissance et développement du vitalisme en France de la deuxième moitié du XVIIIe siècle à la fin du Premier Empire, Voltaire Foundation, Oxford (originally a PhD dissertation in 3 vols., University of Paris, 1987).
Rigoli J. (2013), “The ‘Novel of Medicine’,” [in:] Vitalism and the Scientific Image in Post-Enlightenment Life Science, 1800–2010, S. Normandin, C.T. Wolfe (eds.), Springer, Dordrecht: 77–102.
Roger J. (1963), Les sciences de la vie dans la pensée française du XVIIIe siècle. La génération des animaux de Descartes à l’Encyclopédie, Armand Colin, Paris (reprinted Albin Michel 1995).
Roger J. (1995), Pour une histoire des sciences à part entière, C. Blanckaert (ed.), Albin Michel, Paris.
Schmaltz T.M. (2016), Early Modern Cartesianisms: Dutch and French Constructions, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Sutton J. (1998), Philosophy and Memory Traces: Descartes to Connectionism, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Sutton J. (2007), “Spongy Brains and Material Memories,” [in:] Environment and Embodiment in Early Modern England, M. Floyd-Wilson, G. Sullivan (eds.), Palgrave Macmillan, London: 14–34.
Thomson A. (2008), Bodies of Thought: Science, Religion, and the Soul in the Early Enlightenment, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Vartanian A. (1982), “Quelques réflexions sur le concept d’âme dans la littérature clandestine,” [in:] Le matérialisme du XVIIIe siècle et la littérature clandestine, O. Bloch (ed.), Vrin, Paris: 149–165.
Vila A.C. (1998), Enlightenment and Pathology. Sensibility in the Literature and Medicine of 18th Century France, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
Wilson C. (1997), “Between Medicina Mentis and Medical Materialism,” [in:] Logic and the Workings of the Mind, P.A. Easton (ed.), Ridgeview, Atascadero: 237–253.
Wolfe C.T. (2009), “A Happiness Fit for Organic Bodies: La Mettrie’s Medical Epicureanism,” [in:] Epicurus in the Enlightenment, N. Leddy, A. Lifschitz (eds.), Voltaire Foundation, Oxford: 69–83.
Wolfe C.T. (2010), “Endowed Molecules and Emergent Organization: The Maupertuis-Diderot Debate,” Early Science and Medicine 15: 38–65.
Wolfe C.T. (2014), “Epigenesis as Spinozism in Diderot’s Biological Project,” [in:] The Life Sciences in Early Modern Philosophy, O. Nachtomy, J.E.H. Smith (eds.), Oxford University Press, Oxford: 181–201.
Wolfe C.T. (2015), “Tres medici, duo athei? The Physician as Atheist and the Medicalization of the Soul,” [in:] Early Modern Medicine and Natural Philosophy, P. Distelzweig, B. Goldberg, E. Ragland (eds.), Springer, Dordrecht: 343–366.
Wolfe C.T. (2016), “The ‘Physiology of the Understanding’ and the ‘Mechanics of the Soul’: Reflections on Some Phantom Philosophical Projects,” Quaestio 16: 3–25.
Wolfe C.T. (2017), “Models of Organic Organization in Montpellier Vitalism,” Early Science and Medicine 22: 229–252.
Wolfe C.T. (2018), “Material-Cerebral Plasticity, Fluid Ontology: The Case of Animal Spirits,” Epistémocritique: 95–112.
Wolfe C.T. (2021), “Locke and Projects for Naturalizing the Mind in the 18th Century,” [in:] The Lockean Mind, J. Gordon-Roth, S. Weinberg (eds.), Routledge, London: 152–163.
Wolfe C.T., Shank J.B. (2019), “Diderot,” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, URL = https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/diderot/ [Accessed 29.08.2023].
Wolfe C.T., van Esveld M. (2014), “The Material Soul: Strategies for Naturalising the Soul in an Early Modern Epicurean Context,” [in:] Conjunctions of Mind, Soul and Body from Plato to the Enlightenment, D. Kambaskovic (ed.), Springer, Dordrecht: 371–421.
Wright J.P. (2000), “Substance vs. Function Dualism in Eighteenth-Century Medicine,” [in:] Psyche and Soma. Physicians and Metaphysicians on the Mind–Body Problem from Antiquity to the Enlightenment, J.P. Wright, P. Potter (eds.), Clarendon Press, Oxford: 237–254.