The Missing Alternative Objection to Criminal Law Abolitionism
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Criminal law abolitionists claim that legal punishment cannot be morally justified and that we should therefore abolish criminal law. While this is still a minority position in the current debate, the number of proponents has been increasing, and even opponents have developed a certain degree of sympathy for such claims in recent years. Yet one of the reasons many remain hesitant regarding the abolition of criminal law appears to be the lack of a thought-through alternative, in addition to abolitionists disagreeing considerably amongst themselves on what an alternative should look like. I will call this the missing alternative objection. To address this central concern, I will argue in this paper that the most prominent versions of abolitionism actually converge on the same alternative core to criminal law — even though they are driven by vastly different motivations. This core that current abolitionist theories converge on is two-fold: first, the claim that the state should compel offenders to provide restitution for the victim; second, the claim that restorative processes should be used wherever possible when addressing criminal wrongdoing. This common core is enough to reject the missing alternative objection.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
By submitting his/her work to the Editorial Board, the author accepts, upon having his/her text recommended for publication, that Diametros applies the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license to the works we publish. Under this license, authors agree to make articles legally available for reuse, without permission or fees. Anyone may read, download, copy, print, distribute or reuse these articles without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as the author and original source are properly cited. The author holds the copyright without any other restrictions. Full information about CC-BY: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.
References
Barnett R.E. (1977), “Restitution: A New Paradigm of Criminal Justice,” Ethics 87 (4): 279–301.
Benn S.I. (1958), “An Approach to the Problems of Punishment,” Philosophy 33 (127): 325–341.
Bianchi H. (1994), Justice as Sanctuary: Toward a New System of Crime Control, Indiana University Press, Bloomington.
Boonin D. (2008), The Problem of Punishment, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Boonin D. (2018), “Punishment, Restitution, and Incarceration,” [in:] Rethinking Punishment in the Era of Mass Incarceration, C.W. Surprenant (ed.), Routledge, New York: 122–143.
Braithwaite J. (1989), Crime, Shame, and Reintegration, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Braithwaite J., Pettit P. (1990), Not Just Deserts: A Republican Theory of Criminal Justice, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Caruso G.D. (2021a), Rejecting Retributivism, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Caruso G.D. (2021b), “Retributivism, Free Will Skepticism and the Public Health-Quarantine Model: Replies to Corrado, Kennedy, Sifferd, Walen, Pereboom and Shaw,” Journal of Legal Philosophy 46 (2): 161–215.
Caruso G.D. (2022), “Free Will Skepticism and Criminal Justice: The Public Health-Quarantine Model,” [in:] The Oxford Handbook of Moral Responsibility, D.K. Nelkin, D. Pereboom (eds.), Oxford University Press, New York: 222–246.
Caruso G.D., Pereboom D. (2022), Moral Responsibility Reconsidered, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Cholbi M. (2010), “Compulsory Victim Restitution is Punishment: A Reply to Boonin,” Public Reason 2 (1): 85–93.
Christie N. (1977), “Conflicts as Property,” The British Journal of Criminology 17 (1): 1–15.
Dagger R. (2018), Playing Fair: Political Obligation and the Problems of Punishment, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Duff A. (2001), Punishment, Communication, and Community, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Duff R., Hoskins Z. (2021), “Legal Punishment,” [in:] The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, URL = https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/legal-punishment/ [Accessed 17.11.2023].
Feinberg J. (1965), “The Expressive Function of Punishment,” The Monist 49 (3): 397–423.
Flew A. (1954), “The Justification of Punishment,” Philosophy 29 (111): 291–307.
Golash D. (2005), The Case Against Punishment, Retribution, Crime Prevention, and the Law, New York University Press, New York.
Haan W. de. (1990), The Politics of Redress. Crime, Punishment, and Penal Abolition, Routledge, New York.
Hanna N. (2017), “The Nature of Punishment: Reply to Wringe,” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 20 (5): 969–976.
Hanna N. (2020), “The Nature of Punishment Revisited: Reply to Wringe,” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 23 (1): 89–100.
Hart H.L.A. (1960), “The Presidential Address: I–Prolegomenon to the Principles of Punishment,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 60 (1): 1–26.
Hulsman L. (1986), “Critical Criminology and the Concept of Crime,” Contemporary Crises 10 (1): 63–80.
Hulsman L. (1991), “The Abolitionist Case: Alternative Crime Policies,” Israel Law Review 25 (3–4): 681–709.
Husak D. (2020), “The Price of Criminal Law Skepticism: Ten Functions of the Criminal Law,” New Criminal Law Review 23 (1): 27–59.
Lacey N., Pickard H. (2015), “The Chimera of Proportionality,” The Modern Law Review 78 (2): 216–240.
Latimer J., Dowden C., Muise D. (2005), “The Effectiveness of Restorative Justice Practices: A Meta-Analysis,” The Prison Journal 85 (2): 127–144.
Pereboom D. (2013), “Free Will Skepticism and Criminal Punishment,” [in:] The Future of Punishment, T.A. Nadelhoffer (ed.), Oxford University Press, Oxford: 49–78.
Sayre-McCord G. (2001), “Criminal Justice and Legal Reparations as an Alternative to Punishment,” Philosophical Issues 11 (1): 502–529.
Sayre-McCord G. (2002), “In Defense of Reparations: A Reply to Estlund and Gaus,” [in:] Legal and Political Philosophy. Social, Political & Legal Philosophy, vol. 1, E. Villanueva (ed.), Rodopi, Amsterdam, New York: 371–383.
Sherman L.W., Strang H., Mayo-Wilson E., Woods D.J., Ariel B. (2015), “Are Restorative Justice Conferences Effective in Reducing Repeat Offending? Findings from a Campbell Systematic Review,” Journal of Quantitative Criminology 31 (1): 1–24.
Surprenant C.W., Brennan J. (2019), Injustice for All, Routledge, New York.
Tiarks E. (2019), “Restorative Justice, Consistency and Proportionality: Examining the Trade-off,” Criminal Justice Ethics 38 (2): 103–122.
Wringe B. (2013), “Must Punishment Be Intended to Cause Suffering?,” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (4): 863–877.
Wringe B. (2019), “Punishment, Jesters and Judges: A Response to Nathan Hanna,” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 22 (1): 3–12.
Zisman V. (2023), Criminal Law Without Punishment, De Gruyter, Berlin.