Twenty Fregean Ways to Quantify Over Frege's Senses

Main Article Content

Jan Dejnožka

Abstract

This paper continues my discussion with Michael Dummett on Frege’s senses, published in The Philosophy of Michael Dummett and further developed in Diametros. In his reply to my original paper, Dummett came to agree with me that senses are neither objects nor functions, since they have a categorially different kind of linguistico-metaphysical function to perform. He then asks how we might quantify over senses, if they are neither objects nor functions. He discusses two main options, and finds one unviable and the other “very un-Fregean.” I then offer a Fregean or neo-Fregean option in my rejoinder. And I still hold that this way out will do the job, or is at least plausible enough that the burden of persuasion is on those who disagree. But I hope to show in this paper that on a more complete examination of Frege, there are at least twenty Fregean or neo-Fregean ways out, with the one I proposed being option (17).

Article Details

How to Cite
“Twenty Fregean Ways to Quantify Over Frege’s Senses”. 2022. Diametros 19 (71): 15-29. https://doi.org/10.33392/diam.1770.
Section
Articles

How to Cite

“Twenty Fregean Ways to Quantify Over Frege’s Senses”. 2022. Diametros 19 (71): 15-29. https://doi.org/10.33392/diam.1770.
Share |

References

Butchvarov P. (1979), Being Qua Being: A Theory of Identity, Existence, and Predication, Indiana University Press, Bloomington.

Dejnožka J. (2015/2021), Bertrand Russell on Modality and Logical Relevance, 2d ed., CreateSpace, Ann Arbor (MI).

Dejnožka J. (2010), “Dummett’s Forward Road to Frege and to Intuitionism,” Diametros 25: 118–131.

Dejnožka J. (2007), “Dummett’s Backward Road to Frege and to Intuitionism,” [in:] The Philosophy of Michael Dummett, R.E. Auxier and L.E. Hahn (eds.), Open Court, Chicago: 55–113.

Dejnožka J. (1996/2003), The Ontology of the Analytic Tradition and Its Origins: Realism and Identity in Frege, Russell, Wittgenstein, and Quine, Littlefield Adams, Lanham (MD).

Dejnožka J. (1987), “Dual Object Theories of Identity, Existence, and Modality,” faculty paper presented in Sampson Hall, The United States Naval Academy in 1987, URL=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334945593_Dual_Object_Theories_of_Identity_Existence_and_Modality [Accessed 05.03.2022].

Dejnožka J. (1982), “Frege: Existence Defined as Identifiability,” International Studies in Philosophy 14: 1–18.

Dejnožka J. (1981), “Frege on Identity,” International Studies in Philosophy 13 (1): 31–41.

Dejnožka J. (1979), Frege: Existence and Identity, University Microfilms International, Ann Arbor (MI), doctoral dissertation.

Dummett M. (2007), “Reply to Jan Dejnožka,” [in:] The Philosophy of Michael Dummett, R.E. Auxier and L.E. Hahn (eds.), Open Court, Chicago: 114–126.

Frege G. (1918/1968), “The Thought: A Logical Inquiry,” [in:] Essays on Frege, E. Klemke (ed.), trans. A.M. Quinton and M. Quinton, University of Illinois Press, Urbana.

Frege G. (1903/1970), “Frege Against the Formalists,” [in:] Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege, 2d ed., trans. and ed. P. Geach and M. Black, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

Frege G. (1893/1967), The Basic Laws of Arithmetic: Exposition of the System, selections from vols. 1 and 2 (cites are to vol. 1.), trans. and ed. M. Furth, University of California Press, Berkeley.

Frege G. (1892/1970), “On Concept and Object,” [in:] Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege, 2d ed., trans. and ed. P. Geach and M. Black, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

Frege G. (1892a/1970), “On Sense and Reference,” [in:] Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege, 2d ed., trans. and ed. P. Geach and M. Black, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

Frege G. (1884/1974), The Foundations of Arithmetic: A logico-mathematical enquiry into the concept of number, 2d rev. ed., trans. J. Austin, Northwestern University Press, Evanston.

Furth M. (1967), “Editor’s Introduction,” [in:] G. Frege, The Basic Laws of Arithmetic: Exposition of the System, selections from vols. 1 and 2, trans. and ed. M. Furth, University of California Press, Berkeley.

Most read articles by the same author(s)