Kant and Revolution
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Based on Kant’s political thought, this article deals with the relationship between a ruler’s power and freedom, law and morality. The assumed external freedom is to be guaranteed to individuals by a valid political authority (sovereign); however, the authorities do not have to obey the law, which means that the freedom of citizens is threatened. Thus, a tension appears between the freedom of the individual and obedience to an unjust law. From an authority’s perspective, peace is more important than moral development, and from a moral perspective, the rule of law is less important than ethical perfection. This leads to the question of whether revolutionary changes to the system can be justified on the basis of Kant’s assumptions, as some liberal interpretations of Kant’s thought propose. In this article, I argue that although the revolutionary moment is possible within Kant’s political philosophy, it is in a different place than most liberal authors point out and has no link to the common understanding of revolution.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
By submitting his/her work to the Editorial Board, the author accepts, upon having his/her text recommended for publication, that Diametros applies the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license to the works we publish. Under this license, authors agree to make articles legally available for reuse, without permission or fees. Anyone may read, download, copy, print, distribute or reuse these articles without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as the author and original source are properly cited. The author holds the copyright without any other restrictions. Full information about CC-BY: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.
How to Cite
References
Arntzen S. (1996), “Kant on Duty to Oneself and Resistance to Political Authority,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 34 (3): 409–424.
Beck L.W. (1971), “Kant and the Right of Revolution,” Journal of the History of Ideas 32 (3): 411–422.
Booth W.J. (1986), Interpreting the World: Kant’s Philosophy of History and Politics, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.
Byrd B.S., Hruschka J. (2010), Kant’s Doctrine of Right: A Commentary, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant, P. Guyer, A.W. Wood (eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Dulckeit G. (1973), Naturrecht und positives Recht bei Kant, Aalen: Scientia, Leipzig.
Flikschuh K. (2008), “Sidestepping Morality: Korsgaard on Kant‘s No-Right to Revolution,” Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik 16: 127–145.
Guyer P. (2006), Kant, Routledge, New York.
Guyer P. (2002), “Kant‘s Deductions of the Principles of Right,” [in:] Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals. Interpretative Essays, Mark Timmons (ed.), Oxford University Press, Oxford: 23–64.
Henrich D. (1976), “Kant über die Revolution,” [in:] Materialien zu Kants Rechtsphilosophie, H. von Zwi Batscha (ed.), Suhrkamp, Frankfurt: 359–365.
Hill Th.E. (2000), “A Kantian Perspective on Political Violence,” [in:] Respect, Pluralism and Justice, Th.E. Hill (ed.), Oxford University Press, Oxford: 200–236.
Holtman S.W. (2002), “Revolution, Contradiction, and Kantian Citizenship,” [in:] Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals: Interpretive Essays, M. Timmons (ed.), Oxford University Press, Oxford: 209–231.
Howard W. (1983), Kant’s Political Philosophy, St. Martin’s Press, New York.
Höffe O. (1994), Immanuel Kant, trans. M. Farrier, State University of New York Press, Albany.
Höffe O. (2006), Kant’s Cosmopolitan Theory of Law and Peace, trans. A. Newton, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Kant I. (1902), Gesammelte Schriften, Königlich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Georg Reimer, Berlin.
Kant I. (1996a), The Conflict of the Faculties, trans. A.W. Wood, G. Giovanni, [in:] I. Kant, Religion and Rational Theology, A.W. Wood, G. Giovanni (eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 233–328.
Kant I. (1996b), Toward Perpetual Peace, trans. M.J. Gregor, [in:] I. Kant, Practical Philosophy, M.J. Gregor (ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 311–352.
Kant I. (1996c), The Metaphysics of Morals, trans. M.J. Gregor, [in:] I. Kant, Practical Philosophy, M.J. Gregor (ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 353–604.
Kant I. (1996d), On the Common Saying: That May be Correct in Theory but is of No Use in Practice, trans. M.J. Gregor, [in:] I. Kant, Practical Philosophy, M.J. Gregor (ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 273–310.
Kant I. (1996e), Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason, trans. A.W. Wood, G. Giovanni, [in:] I. Kant, Religion and Rational Theology, A.W. Wood, G. Giovanni (eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 39–216.
Kant I. (1996f), Answer to the Question: What is Enlightenment?, trans. M.J. Gregor, [in:] I. Kant, Practical Philosophy, M.J. Gregor (ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 11–22.
Kant I. (1998), Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, M.J. Gregor (ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Kant I. (2007a), Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View, trans. R.B. Louden, [in:] I. Kant, Anthropology, History and Education, G. Zoeller, R.B. Louden (eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 227–429.
Kant I. (2007b), Idea for a Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Aim, trans. A.W. Wood, [in:] I. Kant, Anthropology, History and Education, G. Zoeller, R.B. Louden (eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 107–120.
Kersting W. (1983), “Neuere Interpretationen der kantischen Rechtsphilosophie,” Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 37 (2): 282–298.
Kersting W. (1992), “Kant’s Concept of the State,” [in:] Essays on Kant’s Political Philosophy, H. Williams (ed.), Chicago University Press, Chicago: 143–165.
Kleingeld P. (1995), Fortschritt und Vernunft: Zur Geschichtsphilosophie Kants, Könighausen und Neumann, Würzburg.
Kleingeld P. (1999), “Kant, History, and the Ideas of Moral Development,” History of Philosophy Quarterly 16 (1): 59–80.
Klemme H. (1995), “Wstęp,” [in:] I. Kant, O porzekadle. Do wiecznego pokoju, trans. M. Żelazny, Comer, Toruń: XXIX–LXXII.
Korsgaard Ch. (1996a), The Sources of Normativity, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Korsgaard Ch. (1996b), Creating the Kingdom of Ends, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Korsgaard Ch. (1997), “Taking the Law into our own Hands: Kant on the Right to Revolution,” [in:] Reclaiming the History of Ethics: Essays for John Rawls, A. Reath (ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 297–328.
Ludwig B. (1997), “Will die Natur unwidersprechlich die Republik? Einige Reflexionen anläßlich einer rätselhaften Textpassage in Kants Friedensschrift,” Kant-Studien 88: 218–228.
Ludwig B. (2010), „Czy pokój nieodparcie zapanuje w świecie? Co, zgodnie z traktatem Kanta ”Ku wieczystemu pokojowi”, gwarantuje nam natura?” tłum. M. Żelazny, Studia z Historii Filozofii 1: 87–101.
Nicholson P. (1992), “Kant, Revolutions and History,” [in:] Essays on Kant’s Political Philosophy, H.L. Williams (ed.), University of Chicago Press, Chicago: 249–268.
Pippin R. (1999), “Dividing and Deriving in Kant’s Rechtslehre,” [in:] I. Kant, Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Rechtslehre, O. Höffe (ed.), Akademie Verlag, Berlin: 63–86.
Pogge Th. (2002), “Is Kant‘s Rechtslehre a Comprehensive Liberalism?,” [in:] Kant‘s Metaphysics of Morals. Interpretative Essays, M. Timmons (ed.), Oxford University Press, Oxford: 133–158.
Reiss S.H. (1956), “Kant and the Right of Rebellion,” Journal of the History of Ideas 17: 179–192.
Ripstein A. (2009), Force and Freedom: Kant’s Legal and Political Philosophy, Harvard University Press, Cambridge (MA).
Waldron J. (1996), “Kant’s Legal Positivism,” Harvard Law Review 109 (7): 1535–1566.
Waldron J. (2006), “Kant’s Theory of the State,” [in:] Toward Perpetual Peace and Other Writings on Politics, Peace and History, P. Kleingeld (ed.), Yale University Press.
Willaschek M. (1997), “Why the ‘Doctrine of Right’ does not Belong in the ‘Metaphysics of Morals’,” Jahrbuch für Recht Und Ethik/ Annual Review of Law and Ethics 5: 205–227.
Williams H. (1992), “Kant’s Optimism in his Social and Political Theory,” [in:] Essays on Kant’s Political Philosophy, H. Williams (ed.), University of Chicago Press, Chicago: 1–14.
Williams H. (2012), Kant and the End of War, Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills, Basingstoke.
Ypi L. (2010), “Natura Daedala Rerum? On the Justification of Historical Progress in Kant’s Guarantee of Perpetual Peace,” Kantian Review 14 (02): 118–148.
Ypi L. (2014), “On Revolution in Kant and Marx,” Political Theory 42 (3): 262–287.