Boredom That Wishes Not To Be
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The present article deals with Heidegger’s research into boredom. The phenomenon cannot be simply described as an emotion but as a fundamental attunement, which represented a pathway to being qua being for Heidegger. Many scholars have argued that the philosopher’s treatment of the phenomenon led to sublimation or transgression in describing it beyond its phenomenological limits. While I agree with the general assessment, I also believe that there is a need to expand the argument further. I will argue that the cause of such transgression lies mainly in Heidegger’s inability to separate the truth from the notion of meaning or sense.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
By submitting his/her work to the Editorial Board, the author accepts, upon having his/her text recommended for publication, that Diametros applies the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license to the works we publish. Under this license, authors agree to make articles legally available for reuse, without permission or fees. Anyone may read, download, copy, print, distribute or reuse these articles without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as the author and original source are properly cited. The author holds the copyright without any other restrictions. Full information about CC-BY: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.
How to Cite
References
Arendt H. (1978), The Life of the Mind, Harcourt, Inc, New York.
Arendt H. (1998), The Human Condition, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Arendt H. (2005), “Socrates,” in: Hannah Arendt-The Promise of Politics, J. Kohn (ed.), Schocken Books, New York: 5–39.
Aristotle (1907), De Anima, trans. R.D. Hicks, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Aristotle (1963), Categories and De Interpretatione, trans. J.L. Ackrill, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Boss M. (2009), “Metaphysics and the Mood of Deep Boredom: Heidegger’s Phenomenology of Mood,” in: Essays on Boredom and Modernity, B. Dalle Pezze and C. Salzani (eds.), Rodopi, Amsterdam/New York: 85–107.
Ciocan C. (2010), “Heidegger and the Problem of Boredom,” Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 41 (1): 64–77.
Dalla Pezze B., Salzani C. (2009), “ The Delicate Monster: Modernity and Boredom,”in: Essays on Boredom and Modernity, B. Dalle Pezze and C. Salzani (eds.), Rodopi, Amsterdam/New York: 5–35.
Elpidorou A., Freeman L. (2019), “Is Profound Boredom Boredom?,” in: Heidegger on Affect, C. Hadjioannou (ed.), Palgrave Macmillan, Cham: 177–203.
Gibbs P. (2011), Heidegger’s Contribution to the Understanding of Work-Based Studies, Springer, London.
Heidegger M. (1949), Was ist Metaphysik?, Vittorio Klosetermann, Frankfurt am Main.
Heidegger M. (1968), What is Called Thinking?, trans. J.G. Gray, Harper&Row, New York.
Heidegger M. (1973), The End of Philosophy, trans. J. Stambaugh, Harper&Row, New York.
Heidegger M. (1984), The Metaphysical Foundations of Logic, trans. M. Heim, Indiana University Press, Bloomington.
Heidegger M. (1995), The Fundamental Concepts of Metaphysics: World, Finitude, Solitude, trans. W. McNeill, N. Walker, Indiana University Press, Bloomington and Indianapolis.
Heidegger M. (1996), Being and Time, trans. Joan Stambaugh, State University of New York Press, Albany.
Heidegger M. (1997), Plato’s Sophist, trans. R. Rojcewicz and A. Schuwer, Indiana University Press, Bloomington and Indianapolis.
Heidegger M. (1998), “What is Metaphysics?,” in: Pathmarks, W. McNeill (ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 82–97.
Heidegger M. (1998a), “On the Essence of Truth,” in: Pathmarks, W. McNeill (ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 136–155.
Heidegger M. (2001), Phenomenological Interpretations of Aristotle: Initiation into Phenomenological Research, trans. R. Rojcewicz, Indiana University Press, Bloomington and Indianapolis.
Heidegger M. (2002), “The Concept of Time in the Science of History,” in: Supplements, J. Van Buren (ed.), State University of New York Press, Albany: 49–60.
Heidegger M. (2002), “Phenomenological Interpretations in Connection with Aristotle: An Indication of the Hermeneutical Situation,” in: Supplements, J.Van Buren (ed.), State University of New York Press, Albany: 111–147.
Heidegger M. (2003), “My Way to Phenomenology,” in: Philosophical and Political Writings, M. Stassen (ed.), The Continuum, London: 70–77.
Heidegger M. (2005), Introduction to Phenomenological Research, trans. D.O. Dahlstrom, Indiana University Press, Bloomington and Indianapolis.
Heidegger M. (2008), Basic Concepts of Ancient Philosophy, trans. R. Rojcewicz, Indiana University Press, Bloomington and Indianapolis.
Heidegger M. (2009), Basic Concepts of Aristotelian Philosophy, trans. R.D. Metcalf and M.B. Tanzer, Indiana University Press, Bloomington and Indianapolis.
Heidegger M. (2010), Logic: The Question of Truth, trans. G. Fried, R. Polt, Indiana University Press, Bloomington and Indianapolis.
Leslie I. (2009), “From Idleness to Boredom: On the Historical Development of Modern Boredom,” in: Essays on Boredom and Modernity, B. Dalle Pezze and C. Salzani (eds.), Rodopi, Amsterdam/New York: 35–61.
MacIntyre A. (1999), Dependent Rational Animals: Why Human Beings Need the Virtues, Open Court, Chicago and La Salle.
Nancy J.L. (2003), “A Finite Thinking,” in: A Finite Thinking, S. Sparks (ed.), Stanford University Press, Stanford: 3–31.
Parvis E. (1985), “Boredom as Limit and Disposition,” Heidegger Studies 1: 63–78.
Plato (1892), Theaetetus, trans. B. Jowett, in: Plato, The Dialogues of Plato, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Slaby J. (2010), “The Other Side of Existence: Heidegger on Boredom,” in: Habitus in Habitat II: Other Sides of Cognition, S. Flach and J. Süffner (eds.), Peter Lang AG, International Academic Publishers, Bern: 101–120.
Svendsen L. (2005), A Philosophy of Boredom, trans. J. Irons, Reaktion Books LTD, London.
Svendsen L. (2012), “Moods and the Meaning of Philosophy,” New Literary History 43 (3): 419–431.