Rawlsian Contractualism and Healthcare Allocation: A response to Torbjörn Tännsjö
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The consideration of the problem of healthcare allocation as a special case of distributive justice is especially alluring when we only consider consequentialist theories. I articulate here an alternative Rawlsian non-consequentialist theory which prioritizes the fairness of healthcare allocation procedures rather than directly setting distributive parameters. The theory in question stems from Rawlsian commitments that, it is argued, have a better Rawlsian pedigree than those considered as such by Tännsjö. The alternative framework is worthy of consideration on its own merits, but it also casts light on two related difficulties with Tännsjö’s approach: (i) the limits of his supposedly ecumenical methodology, which is revealed to be dialectically suspect and (ii) issues with the type of abstraction and idealization from actual judgements and preferences which the approach requires.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
By submitting his/her work to the Editorial Board, the author accepts, upon having his/her text recommended for publication, that Diametros applies the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) license to works we publish. Under this license, authors agree to make articles legally available for reuse, without permission or fees, for any purpose except commercial. Anyone may read, download, copy, print, distribute or reuse these articles without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as the author and original source are properly cited. The author holds the copyright without any other restrictions. Full information about CC-BY-NC: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode.
References
Cohen G.A. (1997), “Where the Action is: On the Site of Distributive Justice,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 26 (1): 3-30.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.1997.tb00048.x
Cohen G.A. (2003), “Facts and Principles,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 31 (3): 211-245.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2003.00211.x
Cohen G.A. (2008), Rescuing Justice and Equality, Harvard University Press, Cambridge (MA).
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674029651
Daniels N. (2001), “Justice, Health, and Healthcare,” American Journal of Bioethics 1 (2): 2-16.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/152651601300168834
Goodin R. (2020), “Setting Health-Care Priorities: A Reply to Tännsjö,” Diametros, September: 1-9. https://doi.org/10.33392/diam.1597
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33392/diam.1597
Miller D. (2013), “Political philosophy for Earthlings,” [in:] D. Miller, Justice for Earthlings: Essays in Political Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139236898
Rawls J. (1971), A Theory of Justice (1st edition), Harvard University Press, Cambridge (MA).
View in Google Scholar
Rescher N. (1969), “The Allocation of Exotic Medical Lifesaving Therapy,” Ethics 79 (3): 173-186.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/291723
Roebyns I. (2008), “Ideal Theory in Theory and Practice,” Social Theory and Practice 34 (3): 341-362.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/soctheorpract200834321
Sen A. (2006), “What Do We Want from a Theory of Justice?,” Journal of Philosophy 103: 215–38.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil2006103517
Singer P. (2009), “Why We Must Ration Health Care,” New York Times Magazine. URL = https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/2009/07/19/magazine/19healthcare-t.html [Accessed 27.12.21].
View in Google Scholar
Stemplowska Z. (2008), “What’s Ideal about Ideal Theory?,” Social Theory and Practice 34 (3): 319-340.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/soctheorpract200834320
Stemplowska Z., Swift A. (2012), “Ideal and Nonideal Theory,” [in:] The Oxford Handbook of Political Philosophy, D. Estlund (ed.), Oxford University Press: 373-389.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195376692.013.0020
Tännsjö T. (2019), Setting Health-Care Priorities: What Ethical Theories Tell Us, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190946883.001.0001