Defending Deontic Constraints and Prioritarianism: Two Remarks on Tännsjö’s Setting Health-Care Priorities

Main Article Content

Lasse Nielsen
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3093-4448

Abstract

Torbjörn Tännsjö has written a clear and thought-provoking book on healthcare priority setting. He argues that different branches of ethical theory—utilitarianism, egalitarianism, and prioritarianism—are in general agreement on real-world healthcare priorities, and that it is human irrationality that stands in the way of complying with their recommendations. While I am generally sympathetic to the overall project and line of argumentation taken by the book, this paper raises two concerns with Tännsjö’s argument. First, that he is wrong to set aside deontic constraints as irrelevant or as pointing in the same direction as consequentialism. Secondly, that his argument against prioritarianism in favor of utilitarianism is insufficient and under-developed. Given these problems, I conclude that we should welcome Tännsjö’s contribution but with these qualifications in mind.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Nielsen, Lasse. 2021. “Defending Deontic Constraints and Prioritarianism: Two Remarks on Tännsjö’s Setting Health-Care Priorities”. Diametros 18 (68):33-45. https://doi.org/10.33392/diam.1673.
Section
Articles
Share |

References

Formosa P., Mackenzie C. (2014), “Nussbaum, Kant, and the Capabilities Approach to Dignity,” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17(5): 875-892.
View in Google Scholar

Gericke C.A., Riesberg A, Busse R. (2005), “Ethical issues in funding orphan drug research and development,” Journal of Medical Ethics 31:164-168.
View in Google Scholar

Holtug N. (2010), Persons, interests, and justice, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
View in Google Scholar

Kant I. (1785/1996), Groundwork of The Metaphysics of morals, [in:] Gregor MJ. (ed.), Practical Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
View in Google Scholar

McKerlie D. (1997), “Priority and time,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 27(3): 287-309.
View in Google Scholar

Nielsen L. (2021), “Pandemic Prioritarianism,” Journal of Medical Ethics, published online: 4 February 2021, doi:10.1136/medethics-2020-106910.
View in Google Scholar

Nordenfelt L. (2004), “The Varieties of Dignity,” Health Care Analysis 12(2): 69-81.
View in Google Scholar

Parfit D. (1997), “Equality or priority?” Ratio 10(3): 202-221.
View in Google Scholar

Segall S. (2016), Why Inequality Matters, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
View in Google Scholar

Sensen O. (2011), Kant on Human Dignity, De Gruyter, Berlin.
View in Google Scholar

Tännsjö T. (2019), Setting Health-Care Priorities: What Ethical Theories Tell Us, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
View in Google Scholar

Tännsjö T. (2015), “Utilitarianism or prioritarianism?” Utilitas 27(2): 240-250.
View in Google Scholar

Ubel P. (2001), Pricing life: Why it’s time for health care rationing, MIT Press, Cambridge (MA).
View in Google Scholar