How Political Is the Kantian Church?
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Commentators who lament that Kant offers no concrete guidelines for how to set up an ethical community typically neglect Kant’s claim in Religion that the ethical state of nature can transform into an ethical community only by becoming a people of God—i.e., a religious community, or “church.” Kant’s argument culminates by positing four categorial precepts for church organization. The book’s next four sections can be read as elaborating further on each precept, respectively. Kant repeatedly warns against using religious norms to control people. Accordingly, he explicitly forbids the true church from adopting any standard form of political governance; it must aim to be radically non-political. Nevertheless, churches organized according to Kant’s non-coercive theocratic model contribute something essential to the ultimate political goal of achieving perpetual peace and an end to war: by approaching the ultimate ethical goal (the highest good), the true church offers an antidote to normative fragmentation.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Bergen W.W. (2019), Moralizing the Civilized: A Kantian Approach to the Problem of Normative Fragmentation, M.Phil. thesis in philosophy at the Chinese University of Hong Kong.
View in Google Scholar
Chignell A. (2010), “The Devil, the Virgin, and the Envoy: Symbols of Moral Struggle in Religion II.2,” [in:] Religion innerhalb der Grenzen der bloßen Vernunft, O. Höffe (ed.), Akademie Verlag, Berlin: 111–130.
View in Google Scholar
Fauchald O.K., Nollkaemper A. (eds.) (2012), The Practice of International and National Courts and the (De-)Fragmentation of International Law, Hart Publishing, Oxford.
View in Google Scholar
Kant I. (1793/2009), Religion within the Bounds of Bare Reason, trans. W.S. Pluhar, Hackett, Indianapolis (revised translation in Palmquist (2016)).
View in Google Scholar
McGaughey D. (2013), “Historical and Pure Religion: A Response to Stephen Palmquist,” The Journal of Religion 93 (2): 151–176.
DOI
View in Google Scholar
Molloy S. (2013), “An ‘All–Unifying Church Triumphant’. A Neglected Dimension of Kant’s Theory of International Relations,” The International History Review 35 (2): 317–336.
DOI
View in Google Scholar
Molloy S. (2017), Kant’s International Relations: The Political Theology of Perpetual Peace, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
DOI
View in Google Scholar
Palmquist S. (1992), “Does Kant Reduce Religion to Morality?,” Kant-Studien 83 (2): 129–148.
DOI
View in Google Scholar
Palmquist S. (1993), Biblical Theocracy: A Vision of the Biblical Foundations for a Christian Political Philosophy, Philopsychy Press, Hong Kong.
View in Google Scholar
Palmquist S. (1994), “‘The Kingdom of God Is at Hand!’ (Did Kant Really Say That?),” History of Philosophy Quarterly 11 (4): 421–437.
View in Google Scholar
Palmquist S. (2000), Kant’s Critical Religion: Volume Two of Kant’s System of Perspectives, Ashgate, Aldershot; republished (2019), Routledge, New York.
View in Google Scholar
Palmquist S. (2009), “Kant’s Religious Argument for the Existence of God—The Ultimate Dependence of Human Destiny on Divine Assistance,” Faith and Philosophy 26 (1): 3–22.
DOI
View in Google Scholar
Palmquist S. (2010a), “Philip J. Rossi’s The Social Authority of Reason: Kant’s Critique, Radical Evil and the Destiny of Humankind,” Kant-Studien 101 (1): 127–131.
View in Google Scholar
Palmquist S. (2010b), “Kant’s Ethics of Grace: Perspectival Solutions to the Moral Difficulties with Divine Assistance,” The Journal of Religion 90 (4): 530–553.
DOI
View in Google Scholar
Palmquist S. (2012), “Could Kant’s Jesus Be God?,” International Philosophical Quarterly 52 (4): 421–437.
DOI
View in Google Scholar
Palmquist S. (2016), Comprehensive Commentary on Kant’s Religion within the Bounds of Bare Reason, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
DOI
View in Google Scholar
Palmquist S. (2017), “Kant’s Model for Building the True Church: Transcending ‘Might Makes Right’ and ‘Should Makes Good’ through the Idea of a Non-Coercive Theocracy,” Diametros 54: 76–94.
View in Google Scholar
Palmquist S. (2019), Kant and Mysticism: Critique as the Experience of Baring All in Reason’s Light, Lexington Books, Lanham.
View in Google Scholar
Palmquist S. (2020), “Humanity’s Moral Trajectory: Rossi on Kantian Critique,” Philosophia (forthcoming).
View in Google Scholar
Rossi P.J. (2005), The Social Authority of Reason: Kant’s Critique, Radical Evil, and the Destiny of Humankind, SUNY Press, New York.
View in Google Scholar
Rossi P.J. (2019), The Ethical Commonwealth in History: Peace-Making as the Moral Vocation of Humanity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
DOI
View in Google Scholar
Taylor C. (1989), Sources of the Self: The Making of Modern Identity, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.
View in Google Scholar
Taylor R.S. (2010), “Kant’s Political Religion: The Transparency of Perpetual Peace and the Highest Good,” The Review of Politics 72 (1): 1–24.
DOI
View in Google Scholar
Williams H. (1983), Kant’s Political Philosophy, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
View in Google Scholar
Williams H. (1996), International Relations and the Limits of Political Theory, St. Martin’s Press, New York.
DOI
View in Google Scholar
Williams H. (2018), “Sean Molloy Kant’s International Relations,” Kantian Review 23 (4): 689–693.
DOI
View in Google Scholar
Wong S. (2018), The Roles of the Moral and the Political in the Philosophies of Kant and Rawls, PhD dissertation in Philosophy at Hong Kong Baptist University.
View in Google Scholar