How Political Is the Kantian Church?
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Commentators who lament that Kant offers no concrete guidelines for how to set up an ethical community typically neglect Kant’s claim in Religion that the ethical state of nature can transform into an ethical community only by becoming a people of God—i.e., a religious community, or “church.” Kant’s argument culminates by positing four categorial precepts for church organization. The book’s next four sections can be read as elaborating further on each precept, respectively. Kant repeatedly warns against using religious norms to control people. Accordingly, he explicitly forbids the true church from adopting any standard form of political governance; it must aim to be radically non-political. Nevertheless, churches organized according to Kant’s non-coercive theocratic model contribute something essential to the ultimate political goal of achieving perpetual peace and an end to war: by approaching the ultimate ethical goal (the highest good), the true church offers an antidote to normative fragmentation.
Downloads
Article Details
By submitting his/her work to the Editorial Board, the author accepts, upon having his/her text recommended for publication, that Diametros applies the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) license to works we publish. Under this license, authors agree to make articles legally available for reuse, without permission or fees, for any purpose except commercial. Anyone may read, download, copy, print, distribute or reuse these articles without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as the author and original source are properly cited. The author holds the copyright without any other restrictions. Full information about CC-BY-NC: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode.
References
Bergen W.W. (2019), Moralizing the Civilized: A Kantian Approach to the Problem of Normative Fragmentation, M.Phil. thesis in philosophy at the Chinese University of Hong Kong.
View in Google Scholar
Chignell A. (2010), “The Devil, the Virgin, and the Envoy: Symbols of Moral Struggle in Religion II.2,” [in:] Religion innerhalb der Grenzen der bloßen Vernunft, O. Höffe (ed.), Akademie Verlag, Berlin: 111–130.
View in Google Scholar
Fauchald O.K., Nollkaemper A. (eds.) (2012), The Practice of International and National Courts and the (De-)Fragmentation of International Law, Hart Publishing, Oxford.
View in Google Scholar
Kant I. (1793/2009), Religion within the Bounds of Bare Reason, trans. W.S. Pluhar, Hackett, Indianapolis (revised translation in Palmquist (2016)).
View in Google Scholar
McGaughey D. (2013), “Historical and Pure Religion: A Response to Stephen Palmquist,” The Journal of Religion 93 (2): 151–176.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/669206
Molloy S. (2013), “An ‘All–Unifying Church Triumphant’. A Neglected Dimension of Kant’s Theory of International Relations,” The International History Review 35 (2): 317–336.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07075332.2012.761148
Molloy S. (2017), Kant’s International Relations: The Political Theology of Perpetual Peace, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.5036715
Palmquist S. (1992), “Does Kant Reduce Religion to Morality?,” Kant-Studien 83 (2): 129–148.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/kant.1992.83.2.129
Palmquist S. (1993), Biblical Theocracy: A Vision of the Biblical Foundations for a Christian Political Philosophy, Philopsychy Press, Hong Kong.
View in Google Scholar
Palmquist S. (1994), “‘The Kingdom of God Is at Hand!’ (Did Kant Really Say That?),” History of Philosophy Quarterly 11 (4): 421–437.
View in Google Scholar
Palmquist S. (2000), Kant’s Critical Religion: Volume Two of Kant’s System of Perspectives, Ashgate, Aldershot; republished (2019), Routledge, New York.
View in Google Scholar
Palmquist S. (2009), “Kant’s Religious Argument for the Existence of God—The Ultimate Dependence of Human Destiny on Divine Assistance,” Faith and Philosophy 26 (1): 3–22.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/faithphil20092611
Palmquist S. (2010a), “Philip J. Rossi’s The Social Authority of Reason: Kant’s Critique, Radical Evil and the Destiny of Humankind,” Kant-Studien 101 (1): 127–131.
View in Google Scholar
Palmquist S. (2010b), “Kant’s Ethics of Grace: Perspectival Solutions to the Moral Difficulties with Divine Assistance,” The Journal of Religion 90 (4): 530–553.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/654821
Palmquist S. (2012), “Could Kant’s Jesus Be God?,” International Philosophical Quarterly 52 (4): 421–437.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/ipq201252443
Palmquist S. (2016), Comprehensive Commentary on Kant’s Religion within the Bounds of Bare Reason, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118619599
Palmquist S. (2017), “Kant’s Model for Building the True Church: Transcending ‘Might Makes Right’ and ‘Should Makes Good’ through the Idea of a Non-Coercive Theocracy,” Diametros 54: 76–94.
View in Google Scholar
Palmquist S. (2019), Kant and Mysticism: Critique as the Experience of Baring All in Reason’s Light, Lexington Books, Lanham.
View in Google Scholar
Palmquist S. (2020), “Humanity’s Moral Trajectory: Rossi on Kantian Critique,” Philosophia (forthcoming).
View in Google Scholar
Rossi P.J. (2005), The Social Authority of Reason: Kant’s Critique, Radical Evil, and the Destiny of Humankind, SUNY Press, New York.
View in Google Scholar
Rossi P.J. (2019), The Ethical Commonwealth in History: Peace-Making as the Moral Vocation of Humanity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108529686
Taylor C. (1989), Sources of the Self: The Making of Modern Identity, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.
View in Google Scholar
Taylor R.S. (2010), “Kant’s Political Religion: The Transparency of Perpetual Peace and the Highest Good,” The Review of Politics 72 (1): 1–24.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034670509990945
Williams H. (1983), Kant’s Political Philosophy, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
View in Google Scholar
Williams H. (1996), International Relations and the Limits of Political Theory, St. Martin’s Press, New York.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24940-4
Williams H. (2018), “Sean Molloy Kant’s International Relations,” Kantian Review 23 (4): 689–693.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1369415418000468
Wong S. (2018), The Roles of the Moral and the Political in the Philosophies of Kant and Rawls, PhD dissertation in Philosophy at Hong Kong Baptist University.
View in Google Scholar