The Ambiguity of Kant's Concept of the Visible Church

Main Article Content

Gordon Michalson Jr.
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7203-7019

Abstract

This paper explores the implications of Manfred Kuehn’s observation that Kant’s claim in Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason that the ethical community must be a community under God  seems “a bit strained.” After clarifying Kant’s train of thought that results in his conception of the ethical community in the form of the “visible church,” the paper argues that the seemingly strong religious dimension may be misleading. If we understand the ethical community to be the development of the kingdom of ends in the Groundwork , it becomes apparent that Kant’s notion of God’s “sovereignty” over the ethical community is a shared sovereignty lodged in rationality and not in God’s own will. The “strain” that Kuehn senses thus suggests the potentially gratuitous nature of Kant’s references to God’s sovereignty over the ethical community. Despite the initial appearances, Kant’s account of the ethical community in the form of the visible church is, over the long term, closer to a secularizing move than to a robustly religious one.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Michalson Jr., Gordon. 2020. “The Ambiguity of Kant’s Concept of the Visible Church”. Diametros 17 (65):77-94. https://doi.org/10.33392/diam.1604.
Section
Articles
Share |

References

Anderson-Gold S. (2001), Unnecessary Evil: History and Moral Progress in the Philosophy of Immanuel Kant, State University Press of New York, Albany.
View in Google Scholar

Anderson-Gold S., Muchnik P. (eds.) (2010), Kant’s Anatomy of Evil, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511691898

Banham G. (2003), Kant’s Practical Philosophy: From Critique to Doctrine, Palgrave Macmillan, London.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230501188

Bonhoeffer D. (1972), Letters and Papers from Prison, E. Bethge (ed.), Macmillan, New York.
View in Google Scholar

Chignell A., Anderson P., Firestone C. et al. (2012), “Symposium: Kant’s Philosophy of Religion,” Faith and Philosophy 29: 144–228.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/faithphil201229214

Despland M. (1973), Kant on History and Religion, McGill-Queen’s University Press, Montreal, London.
View in Google Scholar

DiCenso J.J. (2012), Kant’s Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason: A Commentary, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
View in Google Scholar

DiCenso J.J. (2019), “Kant on Ethical Institutions,” The Southern Journal of Philosophy 57 (1): 30–55.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/sjp.12314

Flikschuh K. (2009), “Kant’s Kingdom of Ends: Metaphysical, not Political,” [in:] Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: A Critical Guide, J. Timmermann (ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 119–139.
View in Google Scholar

Flikschuh K. (2011), “Gottesdienst und Afterdienst: die Kirche als öffentliche Institution?,” [in:] I. Kant, Die Religion innerhalb der Grenzen der bloßen Vernunft, O. Höffe (ed.), Akademie Verlag, Berlin: 193–210.
View in Google Scholar

Förster E. (2000), Kant’s Final Synthesis: An Essay on the Opus Postumum, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.
View in Google Scholar

Grenberg J.M. (2010), “Social Dimensions of Kant’s Conception of Radical Evil,” [in:] Kant’s Anatomy of Evil, S. Anderson-Gold, P. Muchnik (eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 173–194.
View in Google Scholar

Guyer P. (2000), Kant on Freedom, Law, and Happiness, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173339

Guyer P. (2009), “The Crooked Timber of Mankind,” [in:] Kant’s Idea for a Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Aim: A Critical Guide, A. Rorty, J. Schmidt (eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 129–149.
View in Google Scholar

Höffe O. (ed.) (2011), Die Religion innerhalb der Grenzen der bloßen Vernunft, Akademie Verlag, Berlin.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1524/9783050056234

Kant I. (1793/1996), Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason, trans. G. Di Giovanni, [in:] I. Kant, Religion and Rational Theology, A.W. Wood, G. Di Giovanni (eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 39–216.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511814433.005

Kant I. (1788/1997), Critique of Practical Reason, trans. M.J. Gregor, [in:] I. Kant, Practical Philosophy, M.J. Gregor (ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 133–272.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813306.010

Kant I. (1785/2012), Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, trans. and ed. M.J. Gregor, J. Timmermann, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
View in Google Scholar

Kneller J., Axinn S. (eds.) (1998), Autonomy and Community: Readings in Contemporary Kantian Social Philosophy, State University of New York Press, Albany.
View in Google Scholar

Korsgaard C. (1996), Creating the Kingdom of Ends, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174503

Kuehn M. (2001), Kant: A Biography, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107050433

Louden R. (2011), Kant’s Human Being: Essays on His Theory of Human Nature, Oxford University Press, New York.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199768714.001.0001

MacIntyre A., Ricoeur P. (1969), The Religious Significance of Atheism, Columbia University Press, New York, London.
View in Google Scholar

Mariña J. (1997), “Kant on Grace: A Reply to his Critics,” Religious Studies 33: 379–400.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412597004046

Mariña J. (2017), “Kant’s Robust Theory of Grace,” Con-Textos Kantianos 6: 302–320.
View in Google Scholar

Michalson G. (1999), Kant and the Problem of God, Blackwell, Oxford.
View in Google Scholar

Michalson G. (2001), “God and Kant’s Ethical Commonwealth,” The Thomist 65: 67–92.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/tho.2001.0016

Michalson G. (ed.) (2014), Kant’s Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason: A Critical Guide, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139088138

Miller E. (2015), Kant’s Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason, Bloomsbury, London.
View in Google Scholar

Muchnik P., Pasternack L. (2017), “A Guide to Kant’s Treatment of Grace,” International Journal of Philosophy 6: 256–271.
View in Google Scholar

O’Neill O. (2015), Constructing Authorities: Reason, Politics and Interpretation in Kant’s Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316337141

Palmquist S.R. (2017), “Kant’s Model for Building the True Church: Transcending ‘Might Makes Right’ and ‘Should Makes Good’ through the Idea of a Non-Coercive Theocracy,” Diametros 54: 76–94.
View in Google Scholar

Pasternack L. (2014), Kant on Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason: An Interpretation and Defense, Routledge, London, New York.
View in Google Scholar

Reath A. (2006), Agency and Autonomy in Kant’s Moral Theory: Selected Essays, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0199288836.001.0001

Rorty A., Schmidt J. (eds.) (2009), Kant’s Idea for a Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Aim: A Critical Guide, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511581434

Rossi P.J. (1998), “Public Argument and Social Responsibility: The Moral Dimensions of Citizenship in Kant’s Ethical Commonwealth,” [in:] Autonomy and Community: Readings in Contemporary Kantian Social Philosophy, J. Kneller, S. Axinn (eds.), State University of New York, Albany: 63–85.
View in Google Scholar

Schneewind J. (1998), The Invention of Autonomy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
View in Google Scholar

Sullivan R.J. (1989), Immanuel Kant’s Moral Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621116

Sullivan R.J. (1994), An Introduction to Kant’s Ethics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
View in Google Scholar

Tampio N. (2014), “Pluralism in the Ethical Community,” [in:] Kant’s Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason: A Critical Guide, G. Michalson (ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 175–192.
View in Google Scholar

Timmermann J. (ed.) (2009), Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: A Critical Guide, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511770760

Tomaszewska A. (2016), “Kant’s Reconception of Religion and Contemporary Secularism,” Roczniki Filozoficzne 64 (4): 125–148.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18290/rf.2016.64.4-7

Wood A.W. (1999), Kant’s Ethical Thought, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
View in Google Scholar

Wood A.W. (2011), “Ethical Community, Church and Scripture,” [in:] Die Religion innerhalb der Grenzen der bloßen Vernunft, O. Höffe (ed.), Akademie Verlag, Berlin: 131–150.
View in Google Scholar

Yovel Y. (1980), Kant and the Philosophy of History, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
View in Google Scholar