Publicly Committed to the Good: The State of Nature and the Civil Condition in Right and in Ethics
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
In Religion within the Bounds of Bare Reason Kant speaks of an ethical state of nature and of an ethico-civil condition, with explicit reference to the juridical state of nature and the juridico-civil condition he discusses at length in his legal-political writings. Given that the Religion is the only work where Kant introduces a parallel between these concepts, one might think that this is only a loose analogy, serving a merely illustrative function. The paper provides a first outline of the similarities and the differences between the state of nature and the civil condition in Right and in ethics. The comparison points to a deeper, structural relation between the two pairs of concepts. By doing so, it makes room for developing a unitary conception of the state of nature and of the civil condition, which would underlie both the ethical and the juridical version.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Allison H.E. (1990), Kant’s Theory of Freedom, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
View in Google Scholar
Bacin S. (2013), “The Perfect Duty to Oneself Merely as a Moral Being (TL 6:428–437),” [in:] Kant’s Tugendlehre: A Comprehensive Commentary, A. Trampota, O. Sensen, J. Timmermann (eds.), Walter de Gruyter, Berlin: 245–268.
View in Google Scholar
Bader R.M. (2015), “Kant’s Theory of the Highest Good,” [in:] The Highest Good in Aristotle and Kant, J. Aufderheide, R.M. Bader (eds.), Oxford University Press, Oxford: 183–213.
View in Google Scholar
Byrd B.S., Hruschka J. (2008), “From the State of Nature to the Juridical State of States,” Law and Philosophy 27 (6): 599–641.
DOI
View in Google Scholar
Demiray M.R. (2017), “Public Religion and Secular State: A Kantian Approach,” Diametros 54 (54): 30–55.
View in Google Scholar
Ebels-Duggan K. (2012), “Kant’s Political Philosophy,” Philosophy Compass 7 (12): 896–909.
DOI
View in Google Scholar
Flikschuh K. (2017), What is Orientation in Global Thinking?: A Kantian Inquiry, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
DOI
View in Google Scholar
Flikschuh K. (2010), “Kant’s Kingdom of Ends: Metaphysical, not Political,” [in:] Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: A Critical Guide, J. Timmermann (ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 119–139.
View in Google Scholar
Flikschuh K. (2008), “Sidestepping Morality: Korsgaard on Kant’s No-Right to Revolution,” Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik 16: 127–145.
View in Google Scholar
Flikschuh K. (2000), Kant and Modern Political Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
DOI
View in Google Scholar
Formosa P. (2007), “Kant on the Radical Evil of Human Nature,” The Philosophical Forum 38 (3): 221–245.
DOI
View in Google Scholar
Hasan R. (2018), “The Provisionality of Property Rights in Kant’s Doctrine of Right,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 48 (6): 850–876.
DOI
View in Google Scholar
Kain P. (2004), “Self-Legislation in Kant’s Moral Philosophy,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 86 (3): 257–306.
DOI
View in Google Scholar
Kant I. (1784/2016), Natural Right Course Lecture Notes by Feyerabend, trans. F. Rauscher, [in:] I. Kant, Lectures and Drafts on Political Philosophy, F. Rauscher, K.R. Westphal (eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 73–180.
View in Google Scholar
Kant I. (1785/2011), Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, M.J. Gregor, J. Timmermann (eds., trans.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
View in Google Scholar
Kant I. (1793/2009), Religion within the Bounds of Bare Reason, trans. W.S. Pluhar, Hackett Publishing, Indianapolis.
View in Google Scholar
Kant I. (1803/2007), Lectures on Pedagogy, trans. R.B. Louden, [in:] I. Kant, Anthropology, History, and Education, G. Zöller, R.B. Louden (eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 434-485.
View in Google Scholar
Kant I. (1796/2002a), Proclamation of the Imminent Conclusion of a Treaty of Perpetual Peace in Philosophy, trans. P. Heath, [in:] I. Kant, Theoretical Philosophy after 1781, H. Allison, P. Heath (eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 451–460.
View in Google Scholar
Kant I. (1788/2002b), Critique of Practical Reason, trans. W.S. Pluhar, Hackett Publishing, Indianapolis.
View in Google Scholar
Kant I. (1793/1997a), Kant on the Metaphysics of Morals: Vigilantius’s Lecture Notes, trans. P. Heath, [in:] I. Kant, Lectures on Ethics, P. Heath, J.B. Schneewind (eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 249–452.
DOI
View in Google Scholar
Kant I. (1763/1997b), Kant’s Practical Philosophy: Herder’s Lecture Notes, trans. P. Heath, [in:] I. Kant, Lectures on Ethics, P. Heath, J.B. Schneewind (eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 1–36.
DOI
View in Google Scholar
Kant I. (1797/1996a), On a Supposed Right to Lie from Philanthropy, trans. M.J. Gregor, [in:] I. Kant, Practical Philosophy, M.J. Gregor (ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 605–616.
DOI
View in Google Scholar
Kant I. (1797/1996b), The Metaphysics of Morals, trans. M.J. Gregor, [in:] I. Kant, Practical Philosophy, M.J. Gregor (ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 353–604.
DOI
View in Google Scholar
Kant I. (1795/1996c), Toward Perpetual Peace, trans. M.J. Gregor, [in:] I. Kant, Practical Philosophy, M.J. Gregor (ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 311–352.
DOI
View in Google Scholar
Kant I. (1793/1996d), On the Common Saying: That May Be Correct in Theory, But It Is of No Use in Practice, trans. M.J. Gregor, [in:] I. Kant, Practical Philosophy, M.J. Gregor (ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 273–310.
DOI
View in Google Scholar
Kant I. (1791/1996e), On the Miscarriage of all Philosophical Trials in Theodicy, trans. A.W. Wood, G. Di Giovanni, [in:] I. Kant, Religion and Rational Theology, A.W. Wood, G. Di Giovanni (eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 19–38.
DOI
View in Google Scholar
Kant I. (1786/1996f), Review of Gottlieb Hufeland’s Essay on the Principle of Natural Right, trans. A.W. Wood, [in:] I. Kant, Practical Philosophy, M.J. Gregor (ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 109–118.
DOI
View in Google Scholar
Kant I. (1781/1996g), Critique of Pure Reason, trans. W.S. Pluhar, Hackett Publishing, Indianapolis.
View in Google Scholar
Kant I. (1790/1987), Critique of Judgment, trans. W.S. Pluhar, Hackett Publishing, Indianapolis.
View in Google Scholar
Kant I. (1900–), Kants gesammelte Schriften, Royal Prussian Academy of Sciences (ed.), Walter de Gruyter, Berlin.
View in Google Scholar
Lo Re S. (forthcoming), “Supreme Power: A Neglected Source of Tension in Kant’s Views on Political Resistance,” [in:] Proceedings of the 13th International Kant Congress, C. Serck-Hanssen, B. Himmelmann (eds.), Walter de Gruyter, Berlin.
View in Google Scholar
Mahon J.E. (2009), “The Truth about Kant on Lies,” [in:] The Philosophy of Deception, C. Martin (ed.), Oxford University Press, Oxford: 201–224.
View in Google Scholar
Michalson G. (ed.) (2014), Kant’s Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason: A Critical Guide, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
DOI
View in Google Scholar
Morgan S. (2005), “The Missing Formal Proof of Humanity’s Radical Evil in Kant’s Religion,” The Philosophical Review 114 (1): 63–114.
DOI
View in Google Scholar
Muchnik P. (2009), Kant’s Theory of Evil: An Essay on the Dangers of Self-love and the Aprioricity of History, Lexington Books, Plymouth.
View in Google Scholar
Niesen P. (2007), “Colonialism and Hospitality,” Politics and Ethics Review 3 (1): 90–108.
DOI
View in Google Scholar
Papish L. (2018), Kant on Evil, Self-Deception, and Moral Reform, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
DOI
View in Google Scholar
Payne C., Thorpe L. (eds.) (2011), Kant and the Concept of Community, University of Rochester Press, Rochester.
View in Google Scholar
Pinzani A. (2008), “Representation in Kant’s Political Theory,” Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik 16: 203–226.
View in Google Scholar
Ripstein A. (2009), Force and Freedom: Kant’s Legal and Political Philosophy, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
DOI
View in Google Scholar
Ripstein A. (2004), “Authority and Coercion,” Philosophy & Public Affairs 32 (1): 2–35.
DOI
View in Google Scholar
Stevenson L. (2003), “Opinion, Belief or Faith, and Knowledge,” Kantian Review 7 (1): 72–101.
DOI
View in Google Scholar
Timmermann J. (2018), “Emerging Autonomy: Dealing with the Inadequacies of the ‘Canon of Pure Reason’ (1781),” [in:] The Emergence of Autonomy in Kant’s Moral Philosophy, S. Bacin, O. Sensen (eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 102–121.
View in Google Scholar
Varden H. (2010), “Kant’s Non-Absolutist Conception of Political Legitimacy: How Public Right ‘Concludes’ Private Right in the Doctrine of Right,” Kant-Studien 101 (3): 331–351.
DOI
View in Google Scholar