Publicly Committed to the Good: The State of Nature and the Civil Condition in Right and in Ethics
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
In Religion within the Bounds of Bare Reason Kant speaks of an ethical state of nature and of an ethico-civil condition, with explicit reference to the juridical state of nature and the juridico-civil condition he discusses at length in his legal-political writings. Given that the Religion is the only work where Kant introduces a parallel between these concepts, one might think that this is only a loose analogy, serving a merely illustrative function. The paper provides a first outline of the similarities and the differences between the state of nature and the civil condition in Right and in ethics. The comparison points to a deeper, structural relation between the two pairs of concepts. By doing so, it makes room for developing a unitary conception of the state of nature and of the civil condition, which would underlie both the ethical and the juridical version.
Article Details
By submitting his/her work to the Editorial Board, the author accepts, upon having his/her text recommended for publication, that Diametros applies the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license to the works we publish. Under this license, authors agree to make articles legally available for reuse, without permission or fees. Anyone may read, download, copy, print, distribute or reuse these articles without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as the author and original source are properly cited. The author holds the copyright without any other restrictions. Full information about CC-BY: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.
How to Cite
References
Allison H.E. (1990), Kant’s Theory of Freedom, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Bacin S. (2013), “The Perfect Duty to Oneself Merely as a Moral Being (TL 6:428–437),” [in:] Kant’s Tugendlehre: A Comprehensive Commentary, A. Trampota, O. Sensen, J. Timmermann (eds.), Walter de Gruyter, Berlin: 245–268.
Bader R.M. (2015), “Kant’s Theory of the Highest Good,” [in:] The Highest Good in Aristotle and Kant, J. Aufderheide, R.M. Bader (eds.), Oxford University Press, Oxford: 183–213.
Byrd B.S., Hruschka J. (2008), “From the State of Nature to the Juridical State of States,” Law and Philosophy 27 (6): 599–641.
Demiray M.R. (2017), “Public Religion and Secular State: A Kantian Approach,” Diametros 54 (54): 30–55.
Ebels-Duggan K. (2012), “Kant’s Political Philosophy,” Philosophy Compass 7 (12): 896–909.
Flikschuh K. (2017), What is Orientation in Global Thinking?: A Kantian Inquiry, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Flikschuh K. (2010), “Kant’s Kingdom of Ends: Metaphysical, not Political,” [in:] Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: A Critical Guide, J. Timmermann (ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 119–139.
Flikschuh K. (2008), “Sidestepping Morality: Korsgaard on Kant’s No-Right to Revolution,” Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik 16: 127–145.
Flikschuh K. (2000), Kant and Modern Political Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Formosa P. (2007), “Kant on the Radical Evil of Human Nature,” The Philosophical Forum 38 (3): 221–245.
Hasan R. (2018), “The Provisionality of Property Rights in Kant’s Doctrine of Right,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 48 (6): 850–876.
Kain P. (2004), “Self-Legislation in Kant’s Moral Philosophy,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 86 (3): 257–306.
Kant I. (1784/2016), Natural Right Course Lecture Notes by Feyerabend, trans. F. Rauscher, [in:] I. Kant, Lectures and Drafts on Political Philosophy, F. Rauscher, K.R. Westphal (eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 73–180.
Kant I. (1785/2011), Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, M.J. Gregor, J. Timmermann (eds., trans.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Kant I. (1793/2009), Religion within the Bounds of Bare Reason, trans. W.S. Pluhar, Hackett Publishing, Indianapolis.
Kant I. (1803/2007), Lectures on Pedagogy, trans. R.B. Louden, [in:] I. Kant, Anthropology, History, and Education, G. Zöller, R.B. Louden (eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 434-485.
Kant I. (1796/2002a), Proclamation of the Imminent Conclusion of a Treaty of Perpetual Peace in Philosophy, trans. P. Heath, [in:] I. Kant, Theoretical Philosophy after 1781, H. Allison, P. Heath (eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 451–460.
Kant I. (1788/2002b), Critique of Practical Reason, trans. W.S. Pluhar, Hackett Publishing, Indianapolis.
Kant I. (1793/1997a), Kant on the Metaphysics of Morals: Vigilantius’s Lecture Notes, trans. P. Heath, [in:] I. Kant, Lectures on Ethics, P. Heath, J.B. Schneewind (eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 249–452.
Kant I. (1763/1997b), Kant’s Practical Philosophy: Herder’s Lecture Notes, trans. P. Heath, [in:] I. Kant, Lectures on Ethics, P. Heath, J.B. Schneewind (eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 1–36.
Kant I. (1797/1996a), On a Supposed Right to Lie from Philanthropy, trans. M.J. Gregor, [in:] I. Kant, Practical Philosophy, M.J. Gregor (ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 605–616.
Kant I. (1797/1996b), The Metaphysics of Morals, trans. M.J. Gregor, [in:] I. Kant, Practical Philosophy, M.J. Gregor (ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 353–604.
Kant I. (1795/1996c), Toward Perpetual Peace, trans. M.J. Gregor, [in:] I. Kant, Practical Philosophy, M.J. Gregor (ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 311–352.
Kant I. (1793/1996d), On the Common Saying: That May Be Correct in Theory, But It Is of No Use in Practice, trans. M.J. Gregor, [in:] I. Kant, Practical Philosophy, M.J. Gregor (ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 273–310.
Kant I. (1791/1996e), On the Miscarriage of all Philosophical Trials in Theodicy, trans. A.W. Wood, G. Di Giovanni, [in:] I. Kant, Religion and Rational Theology, A.W. Wood, G. Di Giovanni (eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 19–38.
Kant I. (1786/1996f), Review of Gottlieb Hufeland’s Essay on the Principle of Natural Right, trans. A.W. Wood, [in:] I. Kant, Practical Philosophy, M.J. Gregor (ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 109–118.
Kant I. (1781/1996g), Critique of Pure Reason, trans. W.S. Pluhar, Hackett Publishing, Indianapolis.
Kant I. (1790/1987), Critique of Judgment, trans. W.S. Pluhar, Hackett Publishing, Indianapolis.
Kant I. (1900–), Kants gesammelte Schriften, Royal Prussian Academy of Sciences (ed.), Walter de Gruyter, Berlin.
Lo Re S. (forthcoming), “Supreme Power: A Neglected Source of Tension in Kant’s Views on Political Resistance,” [in:] Proceedings of the 13th International Kant Congress, C. Serck-Hanssen, B. Himmelmann (eds.), Walter de Gruyter, Berlin.
Mahon J.E. (2009), “The Truth about Kant on Lies,” [in:] The Philosophy of Deception, C. Martin (ed.), Oxford University Press, Oxford: 201–224.
Michalson G. (ed.) (2014), Kant’s Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason: A Critical Guide, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Morgan S. (2005), “The Missing Formal Proof of Humanity’s Radical Evil in Kant’s Religion,” The Philosophical Review 114 (1): 63–114.
Muchnik P. (2009), Kant’s Theory of Evil: An Essay on the Dangers of Self-love and the Aprioricity of History, Lexington Books, Plymouth.
Niesen P. (2007), “Colonialism and Hospitality,” Politics and Ethics Review 3 (1): 90–108.
Papish L. (2018), Kant on Evil, Self-Deception, and Moral Reform, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Payne C., Thorpe L. (eds.) (2011), Kant and the Concept of Community, University of Rochester Press, Rochester.
Pinzani A. (2008), “Representation in Kant’s Political Theory,” Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik 16: 203–226.
Ripstein A. (2009), Force and Freedom: Kant’s Legal and Political Philosophy, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Ripstein A. (2004), “Authority and Coercion,” Philosophy & Public Affairs 32 (1): 2–35.
Stevenson L. (2003), “Opinion, Belief or Faith, and Knowledge,” Kantian Review 7 (1): 72–101.
Timmermann J. (2018), “Emerging Autonomy: Dealing with the Inadequacies of the ‘Canon of Pure Reason’ (1781),” [in:] The Emergence of Autonomy in Kant’s Moral Philosophy, S. Bacin, O. Sensen (eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 102–121.
Varden H. (2010), “Kant’s Non-Absolutist Conception of Political Legitimacy: How Public Right ‘Concludes’ Private Right in the Doctrine of Right,” Kant-Studien 101 (3): 331–351.