How is Political Privacy Different from Personal Privacy? An Argument from Democratic Governance
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
In this paper I discuss the political value of the right to privacy. The classical accounts of privacy do not differentiate between privacy as the right of a citizen against other citizens vs. the right to privacy as the right against the state or the government. I shall argue that this distinction should be made, since the new context of the privacy debate has surpassed the historical frames in which the intelligence methods used by governments were comparable to those available to individuals. I also present cases in which political privacy serves as an instrument of protecting important collective agendas exceeding the context of personal privacy. I argue that due to its function, political privacy should be considered a necessary element of democratic governance with the rule of law, imposing legal bounds on governments’ discretionary actions.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
By submitting his/her work to the Editorial Board, the author accepts, upon having his/her text recommended for publication, that Diametros applies the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license to the works we publish. Under this license, authors agree to make articles legally available for reuse, without permission or fees. Anyone may read, download, copy, print, distribute or reuse these articles without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as the author and original source are properly cited. The author holds the copyright without any other restrictions. Full information about CC-BY: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.
References
Allen A.L. (1988), Uneasy Access: Privacy for Women in a Free Society, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Totowa.
View in Google Scholar
Beardsley E. (1971), “Privacy: Autonomy and Selective Disclosure,” NOMOS. Yearbook of the American Society for Political and Legal Philosophy XIII: Privacy: 56–70.
View in Google Scholar
Benn S.I., Gaus G.F. (eds.) (1983), Public and Private in Social Life, St. Martin’s Press, New York.
View in Google Scholar
Carrera S., Fuster G.G., Guild E. et al. (2015), Access to Electronic Data by Third-Country Law Enforcement Authorities. Challenges to EU Rule of Law and Fundamental Rights, CEPS, Bruxelles.
View in Google Scholar
Creemers R. (2018), “China’s Social Credit System: An Evolving Practice of Control,” URL = https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3175792 [Accessed 18.11.2021].
View in Google Scholar
Engelstein L. (1993), “Combined Underdevelopment: Discipline and the Law in Imperial and Soviet Russia,” The American Historical Review 98 (2): 338–353.
View in Google Scholar
Gavison R. (1980), “Privacy and the Limits of Law,” The Yale Law Journal 89 (3): 421–471.
View in Google Scholar
Gillis A.R. (1989), “Crime and State Surveillance in Nineteenth-Century France,” American Journal of Sociology 95 (2): 307–341.
View in Google Scholar
Hassine W.B. (2016), “The Crime of Speech: How Arab Governments Use the Law to Silence Expression Online,” Electronic Frontier Foundation Report, URL = https://www.eff.org/fi les/2016/04/28/crime-of-speech.pdf [Accessed 12.12.2017].
View in Google Scholar
Johnson D.G. (1985), Computer Ethics, [in:] L. Floridi, The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Computing and Information, Blackwell Publishing, Malden.
View in Google Scholar
Lazer D.M., Baum M.A., Benkler Y. et al. (2018), “The Science of Fake News,” Science 359 (6380): 1094–1096.
View in Google Scholar
Levy M.A. (1995), “Is the Environment a National Security Issue?,” International Security 20 (2): 35–62.
View in Google Scholar
Meillassoux M. (2017), “Nothing to Hide,” a documentary film, URL = https://nothingtohidedoc.wordpress.com/ [Accessed 1.11.2017].
View in Google Scholar
Moor J.H. (1990), “The Ethics of Privacy Protection,” Library Trends 39 (1 and 2): 69–82.
View in Google Scholar
Moor J.H. (1997), “Towards a Theory of Privacy in the Information Age,” ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society 27 (3): 27–32.
View in Google Scholar
Newman J. (2009), “Google’s Schmidt Roasted for Privacy Comments,” URL = https://www.pcworld.com/article/184446/googles_schmidt_roasted_for_privacy_comments.html [Accessed 15.11.2017].
View in Google Scholar
O’Donnell G.A. (2004), “Why the Rule of Law Matters,” Journal of Democracy 15 (4): 32–46.
View in Google Scholar
OHCHR (2016), “UN Rights Experts Urge France to Protect Fundamental Freedoms while Countering Terrorism,” OHCHR Press Release, URL = https://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?LangID=E&NewsID=16966 [Accessed 18.11.2021].
View in Google Scholar
Parent W.A. (1983), “Privacy, Morality, and the Law,” Philosophy & Public Affairs 12 (4): 269–288.
View in Google Scholar
Porter A.J., Hellsten I. (2014), “Investigating Participatory Dynamics through Social Media Using a Multideterminant “Frame” Approach: The Case of Climategate on YouTube,” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 19 (4): 1024–1041.
View in Google Scholar
Przeworski A., Maravall J.M. (eds.) (2003), Democracy and the Rule of Law, vol. 5, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
View in Google Scholar
Rachels J. (1975), “Why Privacy is Important,” Philosophy & Public Affairs 4 (4): 323–333.
View in Google Scholar
Reingold D.A. (1999), “Social Networks and the Employment Problem of the Urban Poor,” Urban Studies 36 (11): 1907–1932.
View in Google Scholar
Raz J. (1977), “The Rule of Law and its Virtue,” Law Quarterly Review 93 (2): 195–211.
View in Google Scholar
Rindfleisch T. (1997), “Privacy, Information Technology, and Health Care,” Communications of the ACM 40 (8): 92–101.
View in Google Scholar
Sauer N. (2019), “French Counter-Terrorism Targets Climate Activists,” URL = https://theecologist.org/2019/apr/04/french-counter-terrorism-targets-climate-activists [Accessed 12.12.2019].
View in Google Scholar
Silverglate H. (2011), Three Felonies a Day: How the Feds Target the Innocent, Encounter Books, New York, London.
View in Google Scholar
Scalia A. (1989), “The Rule of Law as a Law of Rules,” The University of Chicago Law Review 56 (4): 1175–1188.
View in Google Scholar
Schoeman D.F. (ed.) (1984), Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy: An Anthology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
View in Google Scholar
Sprenger P. (1999), “Sun on Privacy: ‘Get Over It’,” URL = https://www.wired.com/1999/01/sun-on-privacy-get-over-it/ [Accessed 22.12.2017].
View in Google Scholar
Tamanaha B.Z. (2004), On the Rule of Law: History, Politics, Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
View in Google Scholar
Tavani H.T., Moor J.H. (2001), “Privacy Protection, Control of Information, and Privacy-Enhancing Technologies,” ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society 31 (1): 6–11.
View in Google Scholar
Taylor I. (2017), “Data Collection, Counterterrorism and the Right to Privacy,” Politics, Philosophy & Economics 16 (3): 326–346.
View in Google Scholar
Tréguer, F. (2016), “From deep state illegality to law of the land: The case of internet surveillance in France,” URL = https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01306332/file/Tr%C3%A9guer%20-%20French%20Intelligence%20Reform%20%28draft%29.pdf [Accessed 25.11.2019].
View in Google Scholar
Viseu A., Clement A., Aspinall J. (2004), “Situating Privacy Online: Complex Perceptions and Everyday Practices,” Information, Communication & Society 7 (1): 92–114.
View in Google Scholar
Vogel E.A., Rose J.P., Roberts L.R. et al. (2014), “Social Comparison, Social Media, and Self-Esteem,” Psychology of Popular Media Culture 3 (4): 206–222.
View in Google Scholar
Warren S., Brandeis L. (1984), “The Right to Privacy,” [in:] F.D. Schoeman (ed.), Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy: An Anthology, Cambridge University Press, New York.
View in Google Scholar
Westin A.F. (1968), “Privacy and Freedom,” Washington and Lee Law Review 25 (1): 166.
View in Google Scholar
Westin A.F. (2003), “Social and Political Dimensions of Privacy,” Journal of Social Issues 59 (2): 431–453.
View in Google Scholar
Wolfers A. (1952), “’National Security’ as an Ambiguous Symbol,” Political Science Quarterly 67 (4): 481–502.
View in Google Scholar
Zelikow P. (2003), “The Transformation of National Security: Five Redefinitions,” The National Interest 71: 17–28.
View in Google Scholar
Zhang H., Shu Y., Cheng P. et al. (2016), “Privacy and Performance Trade-Off in Cyber-Physical Systems,” IEEE Network 30 (2): 62–66.
View in Google Scholar
Zuboff S. (2019), The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power, Pluto Press, New York.
View in Google Scholar